Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2843-2850.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0247

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Basal heave stability of deep excavation considering virtual foundation width

LI Ying1, LIU An-jun2, LIU Xing-wang1   

  1. 1. Zhejiang Province Architectural Design and Research Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, China; 2. Hangzhou Tianyuan Architectural Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311202, China
  • Received:2023-02-28 Accepted:2023-05-22 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52078466) and the Zhejiang Province Construction Research Project (2019K002, 2019K003, 2020K110).

Abstract:

In the area of deep soft soil, there are a large number of deep foundation pits conforming to the following characteristics: (1) insertion ratio of retaining wall is between 1:2.0 and 1:2.2; (2) excavation process goes smoothly; (3) basal heave stability does not meet the requirements of relevant standards. In order to reduce the inconsistency between theory and practice, based on the calculation formula of the existed foundation bearing capacity model, a basal heave stability analysis method for foundation pit considering soil stress state and shear capacity was developed by introducing the virtual foundation width. The critical width was defined as the virtual foundation width with the minimal basal heave stability in mathematics. In addition to the critical width, the width of the foundation pit and the thickness of the soft soil layer should also be considered in the selection of the virtual foundation width. A completed engineering example was given to compare the basal heave stabilities of the existed different analysis methods, and to analyze the influence of soft soil layer structure and internal friction angle on stability. The analysis results were closer to the actual situation, and showed that the influence of soil shear capacity was limited when the critical width was used as the virtual foundation width.

Key words: basal heave stability, deep excavation, soft clay, virtual foundation width, bearing capacity, foundation pit width

CLC Number: 

  • TU447
[1] FENG De-luan, YU Yang, LIANG Shi-hua. Research progress and review on strength and water stability of alkali-activated cementitious material solidified coastal soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] E Tian-long, CUI Qiang, SUN Zhi-liang, FENG Yang-zhou, LI Bing-zhen, MIAO Dong, YANG Jian, MIAO Tian, . Structure optimization and bearing mechanism of a novel composite foundation incorporating short column-batter piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2955-2966.
[3] WANG Chang-hong, CAI De-yong, HU Zi-xuan, YANG Tian-xiao. Uplift mechanism and calculation method of constrained grouting pile under disturbed conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[4] XIE Hong-li, ZHOU Zhi-jun, REN Yu-bo, TIAN Ye-qing, FAN Jing-can. Horizontal bearing performance of large-diameter prestressed reinforced concrete pipe pile group [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[5] LAI Feng-wen, LIU Song-yu, CAI Guo-jun, LU Tai-shan, LI Hong-jiang, DUAN Wei, . An analytical approach to determine wall deflections of a deep excavation based on in-situ piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2650-2660.
[6] ZHANG Yu-kun, ZHANG Heng, LI Da-yong, XIANG Qian, . Influence of spudcan penetration and extraction on motion behavior and lateral bearing capacity of adjacent suction caisson [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[7] CHEN Zhi-bo, CHEN Feng, WENG Yang, CAO Guang-wei, ZENG Xu-ming, PAN Sheng-gui, YANG Hui, . Calculation method for vertical bearing capacity of large-diameter steel pipe piles considering the soil plugging effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[8] CHAI Hong-tao, WEN Song-lin, . Centrifugal model test on characteristics of pile foundation bearing capacity failure envelope curve under combined loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[9] JIANG Xin-yu, ZHENG Xi-yao, WU Jun, YANG Ai-wu, LI Bo, . Acid resistance performance of geopolymer-stabilized soft clay under HNO3 and H2SO4 acid erosion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 851-866.
[10] LI Pei-tao, LIU Quan-sheng, ZHU Yuan-guang, GAO Feng, FAN Li-dan, . Combined support method for large deformation of deep coal mine tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 591-612.
[11] LIU Run, XU Ze-wei, CHEN Guang-si, LIANG Chao. Vertical bearing capacity characteristics of hollow square-shaped mat foundation in saturated soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 381-388.
[12] LOU Xu-long, ZHANG Ze-rui, KONG De-qiong, CHEN Xing-chao, ZHU Bin, . Large deformation limit analysis of pipe-soil interaction for heavy pipes in deep water [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[13] YANG Li. Numerical analysis and bearing capacity determination criteria of field plate loading tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 723-730.
[14] WANG Biao, CHEN Xing-xin, YIN Qing-feng, GUO Li-qun, HE Ming-gao, . Pore water pressure disturbance pattern of shield docking method in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[15] GAO Lu-chao, DAI Guo-liang, ZHANG Ji-sheng, WAN Zhi-hui, YAO Zhong-yuan, WANG Yang, . Centrifugal model tests on lateral cyclic loading behavior of large-diameter monopiles in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!