Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 476-484.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1736

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study on the stress relaxation characteristics in straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) under cyclic loading and unloading

LIU Xiao1, ZHANG Xiao-jun1, 2, WEI Jin-zhu3, HE Jun-ling1, WANG Jing-tao1   

  1. 1.School of Resources and Environment,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong 255000,China; 2. Institute of Mining Engineering and Technology,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo,Shandong 255000,China; 3. Shandong Province Metallurgical Engineering Co., Ltd.,Jinan,Shandong 250101,China
  • Received:2022-06-14 Accepted:2023-02-21 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020ME098) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51904178) .

Abstract: Aiming at the insufficiency of hard rock stress relaxation characteristics and rock burst research, we carried out cyclic loading and unloading tests on stress relaxation process of straight-wall-top-arch roadways (tunnels) under low, medium and high loads, derived the stress relaxation law, established the stress relaxation model, and explored the stress relaxation mechanism. The test results show that the stress relaxation process of the straight-wall-top-arch roadways (tunnels) subjected to cyclic loading and unloading under a low load presents three evolution stages: rapid decay, gradual decay and stability, and the stress relaxation trends are consistent;, the time required for stress relaxation increases, and the degree of stress attenuation loss decreases as the number of cycles increases; the stress relaxation process under low load is a process of simultaneous attenuation of tensile and compressive stresses in the surrounding rock of roadway(tunnel), with no internal damage and no overall rupture. Under a medium load, the stress relaxation process of straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) subjected to cyclic loading and unloading also presents three evolutionary stages similar to those under the low load; compared with low load scenario, the stress relaxation process lasts longer under the medium load and internal damage occurs, but subsequent cycles do not lead to surrounding rock failure. Under a high load, the surrounding rock of the straight-wall-top-arch roadway (tunnel) presents a continuous increase in tensile stress and a continuous decrease in compressive stress, the roadway (tunnel) continues to damage and rupture, and the side walls produce stratified burst, eventually forming a V-shaped burst crater, overall, two significant burst failures can be observed. The fractional-order calculus theory is used to describe the stress relaxation process under cyclic loading and unloading. A fractional-order model, namely the stress relaxation equation, is established, and the fitting effect is basically basically satisfactory. Furthermore, we define the degree of stress relaxation that fully can depict the whole process of stress relaxation and the degree of relaxation. Based on the findings of this paper, engineering measures should be taken to stop the deformation of the relaxation process of the rock explosion rock mass from developing to a critical state in engineering practice.

Key words: straight-wall-top-arch roadway(tunnel);cyclic loading and unloading;stress relaxation, tensile stress, rockburst

CLC Number: 

  • TU 457
[1] HAN Shi-ying, WANG Hang-long, PENG Jun, ZHU Jun-xing, WANG Lin-fei, PAN Kun, . Experimental investigation on influence of structural plane on rockburst characteristics of hard surrounding rock in a deep-buried tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[2] HUANG Ye-ning, DENG Hua-feng, LI Jian-lin, WANG Ming-yang, ZHANG Jing-yu, ZHOU Shu-huan, XU Peng-fei. Experimental study on time-delayed failure of sandstone under the combined action of static load and dynamic disturbance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 213-224.
[3] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[4] YAN Zhao-xi, LIU Ke-wei, YANG Jia-cai, GUO Teng-fei, SONG Rui-tao, WANG Pei-yu, . Experimental simulation of rockburst in the surrounding rock of a deep circular cavern induced by single-side unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2437-2449.
[5] SUN Jia-hao, WANG Wen-jie, XIE Lian-ku, . Short-term rockburst prediction model based on microseismic monitoring and probability optimization naive Bayes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1884-1894.
[6] ZHAO Ming-zhu, WU Xue-zhen, YE Qing, WANG Gang, JIANG Yu-jing, DENG Tao, . Impact resistance characteristics of steel pipe shrinkable energy-absorbing bolt and its potential for rockburst mitigation and control [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(11): 3355-3365.
[7] WANG Ya-xin, XIA Yuan-you, HUANG Jian, YAN Yao-feng, FAN Cheng-qiang, LIU Yao-yuan. Model experimental investigation on influence of different intermediate principal stresses on rockburst under gradient stress [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(10): 2949-2960.
[8] ZHANG Ping, REN Song, ZHANG Chuang, WU Fei, LONG Neng-zeng, LI Kai-xin, . Rockburst tendency and failure characteristics of sandstone under cyclic disturbance and high temperature [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(3): 771-783.
[9] LIANG Wei-zhang, ZHAO Guo-yan. Research progress of rockburst risk prevention technology in deep hard rock mines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 454-468.
[10] LIU Yu-chun, JING Gang, ZHAO Yang-feng, FAN Yi, PAN Yi-shan, . Experimental study on fault rockburst instability by loading rate and fault dip [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S1): 35-45.
[11] WANG Yang, LIU Dong-qiao, REN Fu-qiang, HU Tian-xiang, HE Man-chao, . Experimental study on influence of positional relationship between dynamic load and long axis on impact rockburst in an elliptical cavern [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2347-2359.
[12] ZHAO Hong-gang, ZHANG Dong-ming, JIANG Chang-bao, YU Bei-chen, . Mechanical response and failure characteristics of rock mass considering the thickness of weak interlayer [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 969-980.
[13] XU Ding-ping, GUO Guang-tao, XIA Yue-lin, LIU Xiu-yang, JIANG Quan, LI Shao-jun, LI Zhi-guo, . Macro-meso experimental study of intermediate principal stress effect on rockburst of Shuangjiangkou granite under high stress and strong unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(9): 2375-2386.
[14] LIU Cheng-yu, LUO Hong-lin, LI Hong-jun, ZHANG Xiang-xiang, . Formation mechanism and control technology of vein rockburst—— a case study of Uzbekistan Kamchik tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(5): 1413-1423.
[15] YAO Jing-ming, XU Zi-wen, WANG Jian, WANG Lu, . Experimental study on roadway rockburst prevention by combined bolt - aluminum foam support [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 620-626.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!