Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3318-3326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0932

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model

YU Hong1, CHEN Xiao-bin1, 2, YI Li-qin1, QIU Jun1, GU Zheng-hao3, ZHAO Hui4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2.Key MOE Laboratory of Heavy Haul Railway Engineering, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. Huzhou South the Taihu Lake Municipal Construction Co., Ltd. Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China; 4. China Communications Shanghai Waterway Bureau Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200002, China
  • Received:2023-06-27 Accepted:2023-10-08 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978674).

Abstract: The reasonable value of soil constitutive parameters is an important prerequisite for numerical simulation. In order to accurately obtain the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for Huzhou soft soil, a parameter inversion method for the modified Cambridge model based on laboratory experiments and neural networks was developed for two typical soft soils in the region. Firstly, laboratory triaxial consolidation undrained tests and standard consolidation rebound tests were conducted, and based on the test results, the parameter inversion interval of the modified Cambridge model for typical soft soil in Huzhou region was determined. Secondly, based on the principle of orthogonal experimental design, numerical calculations were conducted on the lateral displacement of the retaining structure at different parameter levels during the excavation process of the foundation pit. Based on the numerical calculation results, 64 sets of PSO-BP neural network training samples were constructed. Finally, the constructed training set was used to invert the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for soft soils in Huzhou area. The critical state effective stress ratio (M1, M2), compression parameter (λ1λ2), rebound parameter (κ1κ2), and void ratio (e1、e2) of the two typical soft soil modified Cambridge model parameters obtained through inversion were M1=1.076、λ=0.050、κ=0.021、e1=1.712,M2=1.123、λ2=0.038、κ2=0.012,e2=0.967. The predicted deformation values of the retaining structure calculated through inversion parameters were in good agreement with the measured values, with a relative error of no more than 5%. Based on the inversion parameters, finite element numerical calculation was used to predict the deformation of the foundation pit, and the prediction results verified the accuracy of the inversion method. The influence of the number of neural network training samples and the number of input layer nodes on the inversion results of the Cambridge model parameters for soft soil correction was analyzed. The research results can provide parameter support and technical guidance for similar foundation pit projects in Huzhou area.

Key words: machine learning, artificial intelligence, geotechnical engineering, forecast, algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TU 447
[1] CAI Qi-hang, DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, LU Zheng, XU An, JIANG Fan, . Intelligent prediction of sinking of super-large anchorage caisson foundation based on soil pressure at cutting edges [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] JIANG Xiao-tong, ZHANG Xi-wen, LÜ Ying-hui, LI Ren-jie, JIANG Hao, . Current applications and future prospects of machine learning in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 419-436.
[3] ZHENG Pei-xiao, PU Cheng-zhi, XIE Guo-sen, LUO Yong, LI Guang-yue, . Automatic identification of mine microseismic signals based on feature selection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2199-2210.
[4] LI Xiao-jun, ZHANG Yu-xiao, RONG Mian-shui, NI Ping-he. Bayesian inversion method for soil layer velocity structure and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2237-2254.
[5] SIMA Jing-song, XU Qiang, DONG Xiu-jun, DENG Bo, HE Qiu-lin, LI Hao-liang, LIU Jie, LEI Wen-quan. Application of improved regional growth algorithm to identification of rock mass discontinuities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2253-2264.
[6] ZHANG Yan-bo, ZHOU Hao, LIANG Peng, YAO Xu-long, TAO Zhi-gang, LAI You-bang, . Acoustic emission location method of rock based on time precise picking and intelligent optimization algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[7] LUO Bin-yu, SU Yuan, LIU Xiao-yun, HUANG Teng-da, XIAO Feng-yi, LIU Lan-xin, LI Peng-cheng, . Preliminary study on the behavior of rock strength considering the combined effects of seam dip and confining pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 775-788.
[8] ZHEN Jia-jie, LAI Feng-wen, HUANG Ming, LIAO Qing-xiang, LI Shuang, DUAN Yue-qiang. Intelligent geological condition recognition in shield tunneling via time-series clustering and online learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3615-3625.
[9] SHAO Guo-jian, MAO Ze-hui, SU Yu-chen, JIAO Hong-cheng, LYU Ya-ru. Investigation into transmission coefficient of calcareous sand: waveform coupling effects and gradient boosting prediction method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[10] LI Qiu-wang, FENG Wan-li, HUANG Bo-lin, DONG Xing-chen, CHEN Yun-fei, . Prediction analysis of wading landslide impulse wave in Three Gorges Reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 424-432.
[11] WANG Xin-long, NIE Li-qing, CAI Guo-jun, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Ze-ning, LIU Xue-ning, SONG Deng-hui, . Evaluation of liquidity index based on SVR optimization algorithm using piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 645-653.
[12] WU Jin, WU Shun-chuan, SUN Bei-bei, . Research on fully automatic extraction of fractures from images of rock mass exposures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2621-2632.
[13] LONG Xiao, SUN Rui, ZHENG Tong, . Convolutional neural network-based liquefaction prediction model and interpretability analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[14] HE Long-ping, YAO Nan, WANG Qi-hu, YE Yi-cheng, LING Ji-suo, . Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2839-2848.
[15] YANG Yang, WEI Yi-tong. A new method of liquefaction probability level evaluation based on classification tree [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!