Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (9): 2839-2848.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1607

• Geotechnical Engineering • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Rock burst intensity grading prediction model based on automatic machine learning

HE Long-ping1, YAO Nan1, WANG Qi-hu1, YE Yi-cheng1, LING Ji-suo2   

  1. 1. School of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430081, China; 2. Hubei Dongsheng Chemical Group Dongda Mining Co., Ltd., Yichang, Hubei 443000, China
  • Received:2023-10-25 Accepted:2024-02-02 Online:2024-09-06 Published:2024-09-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Funding of the Hubei Province Key R&D Project (2020BCA082) and the Hubei Province Safety Production Special Fund Research Project (SJZX20211004).

Abstract: To address issues related to excessive human influence and prolonged prediction times in rockburst prediction, we propose a rockburst intensity classification prediction model based on automatic machine learning. This model is trained using five automatic machine learning frameworks and evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Subsequently, we compare the performance of this trained model with results from thirteen common machine learning models. The model developed with the Auto-Sklearn framework achieved a high accuracy of 0.969, while the model created with the Auto-Gluon framework, although having the lowest accuracy among the five frameworks, still achieved an accuracy of 0.927. Rockburst prediction models constructed using AutoML frameworks significantly outperformed traditional machine learning algorithms. The Auto-Sklearn-based model exhibited the highest accuracy. In summary, the optimized model was applied to predict rockburst events at the Shaiqi River phosphate mine, and the predictions were consistent with the actual observations on-site. This indicates that the automatic machine learning-based model for rockburst intensity classification prediction can accurately predict rockburst incidents in real-world engineering settings.

Key words: rockburst, intensity grading, forecast, automatic machine learning, algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TU452
[1] ZHENG Pei-xiao, PU Cheng-zhi, XIE Guo-sen, LUO Yong, LI Guang-yue, . Automatic identification of mine microseismic signals based on feature selection [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2199-2210.
[2] LI Xiao-jun, ZHANG Yu-xiao, RONG Mian-shui, NI Ping-he. Bayesian inversion method for soil layer velocity structure and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2237-2254.
[3] SIMA Jing-song, XU Qiang, DONG Xiu-jun, DENG Bo, HE Qiu-lin, LI Hao-liang, LIU Jie, LEI Wen-quan. Application of improved regional growth algorithm to identification of rock mass discontinuities [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2253-2264.
[4] HAN Shi-ying, WANG Hang-long, PENG Jun, ZHU Jun-xing, WANG Lin-fei, PAN Kun, . Experimental investigation on influence of structural plane on rockburst characteristics of hard surrounding rock in a deep-buried tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1765-1776.
[5] ZHANG Yan-bo, ZHOU Hao, LIANG Peng, YAO Xu-long, TAO Zhi-gang, LAI You-bang, . Acoustic emission location method of rock based on time precise picking and intelligent optimization algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1643-1656.
[6] LUO Bin-yu, SU Yuan, LIU Xiao-yun, HUANG Teng-da, XIAO Feng-yi, LIU Lan-xin, LI Peng-cheng, . Preliminary study on the behavior of rock strength considering the combined effects of seam dip and confining pressure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 775-788.
[7] SHAO Guo-jian, MAO Ze-hui, SU Yu-chen, JIAO Hong-cheng, LYU Ya-ru. Investigation into transmission coefficient of calcareous sand: waveform coupling effects and gradient boosting prediction method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3661-3672.
[8] HUANG Ye-ning, DENG Hua-feng, LI Jian-lin, WANG Ming-yang, ZHANG Jing-yu, ZHOU Shu-huan, XU Peng-fei. Experimental study on time-delayed failure of sandstone under the combined action of static load and dynamic disturbance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 213-224.
[9] WANG Xin-long, NIE Li-qing, CAI Guo-jun, ZHANG Ning, ZHAO Ze-ning, LIU Xue-ning, SONG Deng-hui, . Evaluation of liquidity index based on SVR optimization algorithm using piezocone penetration test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 645-653.
[10] LI Qiu-wang, FENG Wan-li, HUANG Bo-lin, DONG Xing-chen, CHEN Yun-fei, . Prediction analysis of wading landslide impulse wave in Three Gorges Reservoir area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 424-432.
[11] WU Jin, WU Shun-chuan, SUN Bei-bei, . Research on fully automatic extraction of fractures from images of rock mass exposures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2621-2632.
[12] YAN Zhao-xi, LIU Ke-wei, YANG Jia-cai, GUO Teng-fei, SONG Rui-tao, WANG Pei-yu, . Experimental simulation of rockburst in the surrounding rock of a deep circular cavern induced by single-side unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2437-2449.
[13] XIAO Xiao-chun, DING Zhen, DING Xin, XU Jun, FAN Yu-feng, LI Zi-yang, . Joint positioning method of P-wave arrival time picking based analysis-genetic algorithm and its application [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2195-2207.
[14] SUN Jia-hao, WANG Wen-jie, XIE Lian-ku, . Short-term rockburst prediction model based on microseismic monitoring and probability optimization naive Bayes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1884-1894.
[15] LI Xin-zheng, WANG Shu-hong, HOU Qin-kuan, DONG Fu-rui. A stepwise clustering method of rock discontinuities dominated by multivariate parameters based on t-SNE [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(5): 1540-1550.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!