Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3315-3328.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.00571

• Testing Technology • Previous Articles    

Identification of consolidation model parameters using spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements

ZHAN Run-tao1, 2, YIN Xiao-meng 1, 3   

  1. 1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China; 2. Henan Unsaturated Soil and Special Soil Engineering Technology Research Center, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Wuhan, Hubei 441053, China
  • Received:2024-10-10 Accepted:2025-06-09 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41807240) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2023AFB607).

Abstract: The study applies the least squares technique in conjunction with a series of spatiotemporally varying pore water pressure measurements to identify the geotechnical parameters of consolidation models. Firstly, a least squares function for pore water pressure, incorporating both temporal and spatial coordinates, is developed. Subsequently, a new Jacobian matrix is constructed to accommodate any number of temporal and spatial measurements. Using Taylor series expansion, the iterative equations for the Gauss-Newton, Levenberg, Marquardt, and Nielsen methods are derived. The proposed methods are validated using two numerical examples. In Case 1, the consolidation coefficient of Terzaghi’s model is identified. Comparative analysis reveals that all four methods converge to the correct solution, although the Marquardt method converges more slowly. In Case 2, the coordinates of a point source in a two-dimensional fluid-saturated medium are identified using a poroelastic consolidation model. The Gauss-Newton method fails to accurately locate the point source, whereas the Nielsen method accelerates convergence but introduces multiple damping coefficient intervals and convergence values. The Marquardt method is more effective for point source identification. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of sensor placement and initial iteration coordinates for accurate point source identification. Both cases show that the proposed methods possess some noise resistance.

Key words: consolidation, least square problem, Gauss-Newton method, Levenberg-Marquardt method, sensor layout

CLC Number: 

  • TU 431
[1] BAO Shu-feng, DONG Zhi-liang, MO Hai-hong, ZHANG Jin-wen, YU Li-ting, LIU Pan, LIU Xiao-qiang, HOU Ming-xun, . Calculation of static batch settlement and low-pressure consolidation settlement of suspended and fluid mud [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[2] YANG Ai-wu, CHENG Shu-xiao, LIANG Zhen-zhen, HUA Qian-qian, YANG Shao-peng. Combined effects of large-strain consolidation and creep in high-moisture dredger fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[3] NI Rui-si, XIAO Shi-guo, WU Bing, LIANG Yao, . Analytical solution for consolidation of saturated soft clay under vacuum preloading with non-sand drainage system considering nonlinear drain resistance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[4] ZHOU Bo-han, ZHANG Wen-li, WANG Dong, . Numerical study of ball penetrometer for predicting strength of overconsolidated soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[5] XU Bin, CHEN Ke-hao, PANG Rui, . Dilatancy equation and bounding surface model of over-consolidated clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[6] FARHAD Jamil, ZENG Chang-nü, MA Yuan, SHARAFAT Ali. Effect of initial consolidation inclination on strain development in saturated silty soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[7] SUN Hong-lei, XU Zhen-kai, LIU Si-jie, CAI Yuan-qiang, . Large strain consolidation calculation for slurries under vacuum preloading considering the development process of soil column [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[8] XU Bao-long, LU Meng-meng, LIU Yuan-jie, ZHANG Xin-yan. Analytical model and solutions for consolidation of composite foundation with multiple types of drains [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[9] LIU Ji-fu. A new method for analyzing stability of drainage consolidation embankments [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[10] GUO Xiao-gang, MA Lei, ZHANG Chao, GAN Shu-cheng, WANG Hua, GAN Yi-xiong, ZHOU Tong, . A method for controlling heightening rate and slope stability of waste dumps with soft soil base [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
[11] GAO Xu, SONG Kun, LI Ling, YAN E-chuan, WANG Wei-ming, . Prediction of consolidation settlement of heterogeneous ground based on iterative co-Kriging inversion method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 761-770.
[12] SHI Xiu-song, ZHOU Gao-zhang, LIU Lei-lei, . Stability of tunnel face in overconsolidated soil layer based on nonlinear Hvorslev surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[13] WANG Li-an, YU Yun-yan, REN Xin, CHEN Hui, . Dynamic consolidation analysis of fractional order saturated clay foundation under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[14] SUN Jin-xin, LU Meng-meng, LIU Gan-bin, . Nonlinear consolidation analysis for combined composite ground with high replacement ratio-granular columns and impervious columns [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[15] XIE Sen-lin, HU An-feng, XIAO Zhi-rong, WANG Mei-hui, HU Xun-jian, CHEN Yu-chao, . Consolidation analysis of saturated soft soils surrounding tunnels with semi-permeable boundary based on the generalized Voigt model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2024-2036.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!