Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3727-3739.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.00003

• Fundamental Theory and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of counterpressure pile sheet retaining wall

GAN Fei1, 2, WANG Shou-hong1, ZHENG Gang2, ZHOU Hai-zuo2, LI Mei-lin1, WANG Hong1, BI Jing1, ZHANG Yuan-yin3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China; 2. School of Architectural Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 3. Guizhou Power Transmission and Transformation Limited Liability Company, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China
  • Received:2025-01-15 Accepted:2025-04-22 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52164001, 52568047).

Abstract: The counterpressure pile sheet retaining walls are a novel type of slope support structure. Although engineering practice has demonstrated their excellent performance, systematic studies on their deformation characteristics and mechanical behavior remain limited. Through model tests comparing counterpressure piles and cantilever piles, this study investigates the evolution of pile-top displacement, pile deformation, internal force distribution, and earth pressure during the sandy backfill process. Key findings are as follows: (1) The top displacement of the cantilever pile was 81.76 mm, which is 6.69 times that of the counterpressure pile (12.22 mm), resulting in cracking in the soil mass 51 cm horizontally away from the pile top. (2) The counterpressure pile exhibits a typical S-shaped distribution of bending moment, with a distinct reverse bending phenomenon and a reduction in the peak moment. (3) The excessive deformation of cantilever piles leads to an increase in the gravitational component of soil weight perpendicular to the pile shaft direction. The soil pressure on the counter-pressure pile is about 15% lower than that on the cantilever pile, reflecting its good stress redistribution ability. (4) Three primary working mechanisms are identified: provision of anti-overturning moment through soil reaction on the counterpressure plate, enhancement of horizontal resistance via friction between the plate and soil, and increase of passive earth pressure in front of the pile. The counterpressure platform significantly enhances overturning resistance, mitigates slip, and improves long-term structural stability. These findings offer experimental validation and a theoretical basis for optimizing counterpressure pile sheet retaining wall designs.

Key words: counterpressure pile sheet retaining wall, model test, earth pressure, pile deformation, soil resistance in front of pile

CLC Number: 

  • TU432
[1] CHEN Shu-li, GUO Wei, REN Yu-xiao, CHEN Wei. Experimental study of stability of interlocking L-shaped caisson on soft soil interlayer ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[2] WU Jin-biao, ZENG Liu-qi, JIANG Yi-hui, HUAI Rong-guo, ZENG Cheng. Uplift resistance of shallow-buried pipes in unsaturated sand under different saturation levels [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[3] XU Jie, ZHANG Zhen-guang, LI Hai-xiang. Calculation methods of lateral earth pressure on retaining structures for a circular foundation pit in unsaturated soils considering the spatial soil arching effect [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 245-254.
[4] JIA Bao-xin, YUAN Qing-lei. Correction of tunnel seepage field and the minimum overburden thickness under the influence of grouting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[5] LAI Zhi-qiang, BAI Sheng-yuan, CHEN Lin, ZOU Wei-lie, XU Shu-ling, ZHAO Lian-jun, . Experimental study of dewatering characteristics of ring-type tube stockyard sludge storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[6] HUANG Da-wei, LU Wen-jian, LUO Wen-jun, YU Jue, . An experimental study on the influence of synchronous grouting during shield tunnel construction on vertical displacement and surrounding earth pressure in sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[7] FANG Wei, WU Run-feng, ZHOU Chun-mei, . Rankine passive earth pressure of unsaturated soil using envelope shell model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[8] BIAN Hai-ding, WEI Jin, WANG Jin-tao. Mechanical characteristics and earth pressure calculation of ultra-large span pipe-arch corrugated steel plate culverts [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[9] SONG Wei-tao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu-li, LIN Qing-tao, . Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[10] CAI Tian-ming, LI Shun-qun, CHENG Xue-lei, ZHOU Yan, LI You-bing, JING Le-wei, FANG Xin-chang, WANG Ying-hong, . Analysis and application of temperature effects on earth pressure cell test data [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[11] YANG Bai, QIN Chao, ZHANG Yin-hai, WANG Wei, XIAO Shi-guo, . Model tests on bearing characteristics of pile with high rock-socketed ratio above an underlying karst cave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[12] SUN Shan-shan, JIA Shi-wen, LIANG Zhong-xu, LIU Mo-lin, ZHANG Chang-guang. Vertical earth pressure of a trench-buried culvert based on binomial distribution mode for backfill soil load transfers [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[13] SHI Zhan, ZHANG Tie-jun, LI Mei-xiang, TAO Si-ji, BO Yin, LI Yun-bo, . Model test of horizontal freezing reinforcement in mud tank of slurry balanced shield [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[14] CHAI Hong-tao, WEN Song-lin, . Centrifugal model test on characteristics of pile foundation bearing capacity failure envelope curve under combined loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[15] REN Yi-qing, CHEN Bao-guo, REN Guo-qing, YANG Zhen-zhong, XU Fang. Stress characteristics of high-fill box culvert with soft layers placed on the top and sidewall during construction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!