›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (S2): 257-262.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

国内外PDC钻凿特性检测试验研究

周延军1, 2,李祖奎2,周 波2,赵秀菊2,燕 静2,张建政2   

  1. 1.中国石油大学(华东)石油工程学院,山东 东营 257061;2.胜利石油管理局钻井工艺研究院,山东 东营 257017
  • 收稿日期:2009-07-21 出版日期:2009-08-10 发布日期:2011-06-21
  • 作者简介:周延军,男,1969年生,博士研究生,主要从事油气井钻井工艺研究工作

Experimental research on drilling and cutting characteristics of PDC bit at home and abroad

ZHOU Yan-jun1, 2, LI Zu-kui2, ZHOU Bo2, ZHAO Xiu-ju2, YAN Jing2, ZHANG Jian-zheng2   

  1. 1.College of Petroleum Engineering China University of Petroleum (East China), Dongying 257061, China; 2.Drilling Technology Research Institute, Shengli Petroleum Administration Bureau, Dongying 257017, China
  • Received:2009-07-21 Online:2009-08-10 Published:2011-06-21

摘要:

针对PDC钻头在钻复杂硬地层中容易出现崩齿、碎裂、剥蚀脱层和过度磨损等问题,本文采用自主研发的PDC钻凿/磨铣特性检测试验装置对五种φ19 PDC片、五种φ16 PDC片和七种φ13PDC片进行了钻凿/磨铣特性进行了检测及评价。结果表明,不同厂家、不同规格PDC片切削性能各不相同,PDC钻凿特性有后期出刃型和直接出刃型两种。在相同条件下,后期出刃型钻速表现出由低到高再到低,直接出刃型表现为由高到低的特性,因此,在制造PDC钻头的过程中应合理选择PDC片规格尺寸,从而有效提高PDC钻头质量。

关键词: PDC钻头, 硬地层, 钻凿特性, 检测及评价, 规格尺寸

Abstract:

Aiming at the problems of being apt to teeth collapsing, cracking, corroding fallen layers and excessive wear and tear in drilling complex and hard formation of PDC bit, PDC drilling/milling characteristic test equipment independently self-developed was used and drilling/milling characteristics of five kinds of φ19 PDC sheet, five kinds of φ16 PDC sheet and seven kinds of φ13 PDC sheet were tested and evaluated. The results show that the PDC sheets from different manufacturers and different sizes have different drilling and cutting characteristics including latter diamond exposure and direct diamond exposure. Drilling speed is from low to high and then to low for the kind of latter diamond exposure, but from high to low for the king of direct diamond exposure. Therefore, to improve the quality of PDC bits effectively, the specification and size of PDC sheet should be chosen reasonably in manufacturing process of PDC bits.

Key words: PDC bit, hard formation, drilling and cutting characteristic, test and evaluation, specification and size

中图分类号: 

  • TE 21
[1] 刘 涛 ,赵松壮 ,孙付峰,. 上软下硬地层浅埋大跨度车站拆撑安全性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 306-310.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 杨 强,刘耀儒,冷旷代,吕庆超,杨春和. 能源储备地下库群稳定性与连锁破坏分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3553 -3561 .
[3] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[4] 詹永祥,蒋关鲁. 无碴轨道路基基床动力特性的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 392 -396 .
[5] 高广运,赵元一,高 盟,杨成斌. 分层土中群桩水平动力阻抗的改进计算[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 509 -515 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 卢 黎,张四平,张永兴,胡岱文,吴曙光. 压力型锚索力学机理现场试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2435 -2440 .
[8] 王学武,许尚杰,党发宁,程素珍. 水位骤降时的非饱和坝坡稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2760 -2764 .
[9] 王观石,李长洪,胡世丽,冯 春,李世海. 岩体中应力波幅值随时空衰减的关系[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3487 -3492 .
[10] 王维铭,孙 锐,曹振中,袁晓铭. 国内外地震液化场地特征对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3913 -3918 .