›› 2008, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 3246-3250.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

分析含水层水位恢复数据的多次直线解析法

郭建青1,2,周宏飞1,李 彦1   

  1. 1. 中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所,乌鲁木齐 830011;2. 长安大学 环境科学与工程学院,西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2007-04-10 出版日期:2008-12-10 发布日期:2013-08-11
  • 作者简介:郭建青,男,1958年生,硕士,教授,主要从事地下水动力学和环境水力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.40671037)

Multi straight line analytical method for estimating aquifer parameters from recovery test data

GUO Jian-qing1, 2, ZHOU Hong-fei1, LI Yan1   

  1. 1. Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China; 2. Institute of Environmental Science and Engineering, Changan University, Xi’an 710054, China
  • Received:2007-04-10 Online:2008-12-10 Published:2013-08-11

摘要: 提出了一种分析含水层抽水试验中水位恢复数据的新方法。在方法的建立过程中,考虑了地下水位在上升和下降过程中,含水层的的释水系数和贮水系数之间可能存在着的差异。对表示水位恢复阶段降深变化表达式中的两个表达式都采用了相同的简化方式,即对由于持续抽水引起的降深项和停抽时刻开始的虚拟注水引起的降深项,均采用了保留Theis井函数的级数表达式中前三项作为其简化式,简化条件为无量纲时间 和 。在这样的简化条件下,建立了具有同时能够确定含水层导水系数、贮水系数和释水系数的方法。根据贮水系数和释水系数是否相等,可以判断含水层水位下降与水位恢复过程的形变是否可逆。最后,通过算例说明了方法的应用步骤。

关键词: 含水层参数, 水位恢复试验, 数据分析方法, 多次直线解析, 井函数简化

Abstract: A new method for determining hydrogeological parameters of aquifer from recovery data is proposed. The possible difference between releasing water coefficient of aquifer in the stage of water level declining and water storage coefficient as water level rising is taken into consideration. In order to derive the equations for estimating the hydrogeological parameters of aquifer, the same simplification way for two well functions describing two drawdowns is taken; one of these drawdowns is caused by continuous pumping, and the other is caused by imagined recharge with the same pumping rate after pumping stops. This means that the first three terms in the series expressions of the Theis’ well functions are taken as simplified expresses of well function, and the simplified condition is that two dimensionless times are and . Under such simplifications, transmissivity, water storage and releasing water coefficients may be estimated simultaneously. According to the differences between storativity and releasing coefficient, the deformation reversibility of tested aquifer between discharge stage and recharge stage may be judged. Finally, an example is given to show the application procedure of the proposed method.

Key words: parameters of aquifer, water level recovery test, data analysis method, multi straight line analysis, simplification of well function

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+2
[1] 李守巨,刘迎曦,孙慧玲. 基于蚁群算法的含水层参数识别方法[J]. , 2005, 26(7): 1049-1052.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 杨自友,顾金才,杨本水,陈安敏,徐景茂. 锚杆对围岩的加固效果和动载响应的数值分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2805 -2809 .
[2] 王新志,汪 稔,孟庆山,刘晓鹏. 钙质砂室内载荷试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 147 -151 .
[3] 何思明,吴 永,李新坡. 嵌岩抗拔桩作用机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 333 -337 .
[4] 陈智强,张永兴,周检英. 基于数字散斑技术的深埋隧道围岩岩爆倾向相似材料试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 141 -148 .
[5] 杜文琪,王 刚. 土工结构地震滑动位移统计分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 520 -0525 .
[6] 许振浩 ,李术才 ,李利平 ,侯建刚 ,隋 斌 ,石少帅. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757 -1766 .
[7] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,陈 盼,田慧会,吴二林,韦昌富. 不同水合物含量含二氧化碳水合物砂三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 198 -203 .
[8] 钟 声 ,王川婴 ,吴立新 ,唐新建 ,王清远. 点状不良地质体钻孔雷达响应特征 ——围岩及充填效应正演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1191 -1195 .
[9] 邱战洪,何春木,朱兵见,陈合龙. 不同降雨模式下山谷型垃圾填埋场水分运移及其稳定性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3151 -3155 .
[10] 刘 杰,李建林,宛良朋,蔡 健,肖 蕾. 基于卸荷和抗震分析理论的大岗山坝肩边坡锚固优化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 275 -282 .