输电杆塔开挖类基础基于极限状态设计的作用组合选择研究

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 2184-2190.

输电杆塔开挖类基础基于极限状态设计的作用组合选择研究

程永锋¹，丁士君¹，叶超²

1.中国电力科学研究院，北京 100192；2.安徽电力设计院，合肥 230601

收稿日期:2013-09-06 出版日期:2014-08-12 发布日期:2014-08-14
作者简介:程永锋，男，1969年生，博士，高级工程师，主要从事输变电地基基础工程技术及电网防灾减灾技术方面的研究工作。

Research on selection of action combinations based on limit state design for excavated foundations of transmission pole and tower

CHENG Yong-feng¹, DING Shi-jun¹, YE Chao²

1. China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China; 2. Anhui Electric Power Design Institute, Hefei 610051, China

Received:2013-09-06 Online:2014-08-12 Published:2014-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 合理选用由杆塔结构传递而来的作用效应是地基基础设计的重要前提，为了确定输电杆塔开挖类基础基于极限状态设计的作用组合值，分析了输电杆塔对基础的作用特点，并针对上部杆塔对基础作用的3种主要工况，利用静载荷试验结果研究了开挖类基础与地基结构体系的承载特性、破坏特征及其易超越的主要极限状态，并给出了地基基础体系设计时所采用的作用组合，研究表明，上拔和倾覆工况下常规条件开挖类基础承载过大时表现为脆性破坏，按承载能力极限状态设计，采用由可变荷载控制的基本组合；下压工况下开挖类基础的荷载与位移关系曲线一般为非陡降型，按正常使用极限状态设计，主要采用标准组合和准永久组合。

关键词: 输电线路, 开挖类基础, 作用组合, 极限状态, 承载特性

Abstract: Reasonable selection of action combinations is an important prerequisite for ground and foundation design. To determine action combinations based on limited states design for excavated foundations of transmission pole and tower, force characteristic of foundations was analyzed. According to the main three action conditions on foundations of transmission pole and tower, bearing and failure characteristic and easier exceeding limited states of structural system including excavated foundation and ground were studied, and action design combinations of the ground-foundation system were provided. The failure characteristic of excavated foundations bearing too much load is brittle under uplifting or overturning conditions, and fundamental combination controlled by variable load are adopted as required by ultimate limit state design. The relationship curves between load and displacement of excavated foundations are non-steep-fall under downward force condition, based on serviceability limit state design, characteristic or quasi-permanent combinations should be mainly used.

Key words: transmission line, excavated foundations, action combination, limit state, bearing characteristic

中图分类号:

TU 475

程永锋，丁士君，叶超,. 输电杆塔开挖类基础基于极限状态设计的作用组合选择研究[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2184-2190.

CHENG Yong-feng , DING Shi-jun , YE Chao,. Research on selection of action combinations based on limit state design for excavated foundations of transmission pole and tower[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2184-2190.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	覃玉兰, 邹新军, 曹雄. 均质砂土中水平简谐荷载与扭矩联合受荷单桩内力、位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 147-156.
[2]	江强强, 焦玉勇, 骆进, 王浩, . 能源桩传热与承载特性研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3351-3362.
[3]	王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[4]	雷华阳, 刘广学, 周骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[5]	王忠瑾, 方鹏飞, 谢新宇, 王奎华, 王文军, 李金柱, . 带肋竹节桩竖向抗压承载力影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 381-388.
[6]	肖国峰，陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[7]	王家全，张亮亮，刘政权，周圆兀. 土工格栅加筋砂土地基大模型动载试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3539-3547.
[8]	肖忠，王琰，王元战，刘莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[9]	邓琴，汤华，吴振君，尹小涛，袁从华,. 隧道锚–围岩系统承载特性的室内模型试验及畸变纠正[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 247-254.
[10]	徐江，龚维明，张琦，戴国亮，霍少磊，杨超, . 大口径钢管斜桩竖向承载特性数值模拟与现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2434-2440.
[11]	李瑞林，周国庆，林超，赵光思，陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.
[12]	李永辉，朱翔，周同和,. 桩端后注浆对大直径灌注桩影响的现场对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 388-396.
[13]	崔强，周亚辉，童瑞铭，吉晔. 上拔扩底基础与地基土体承载特性差异性分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 476-482.
[14]	卢一为，丁选明，刘汉龙，孔纲强, . 循环加载下X形桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 281-288.
[15]	程永锋，郑卫锋，鲁先龙，孟宪政. 输电线路装配式基础下压计算时底面积取值研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 477-481.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed