基于不同弹性本构方程的塑性区宽度及封孔长度研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1879

›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 2599-2608.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1879

基于不同弹性本构方程的塑性区宽度及封孔长度研究

王刚^{1, 2}，徐浩²，武猛猛³，王锐²，宋相²，周晓华²

1. 山东科技大学矿山灾害预防控制省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地，山东青岛 266590；2. 山东科技大学矿业与安全工程学院，山东青岛 266590；3. 香港城市大学土木与建筑工程系，香港 999077

收稿日期:2017-09-13 出版日期:2018-07-10 发布日期:2018-08-05
作者简介:王刚，男，1984年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事煤岩体的微观结构及其渗流等方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2017YFC0805201)；国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51574158)；山东科技大学杰出青年科技人才支持计划项 (No. 2015JQJH105)。

Study of plastic zone width and sealing length based on different elastic constitutive equations

WANG Gang^{1, 2}, XU Hao², WU Meng-meng³, WANG Rui², SONG Xiang², ZHOU Xiao-hua²

1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Disaster Prevention and Control Co-founded by Shandong Province and the Ministry of Science and Technology, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 2. College of Mining and Safety Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2017-09-13 Online:2018-07-10 Published:2018-08-05
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0805201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574158) and the Excellent Youth Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology (2015JQJH105).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 煤层注水是煤矿开采过程中重要的增透卸压手段，而封孔长度是影响注水压裂效果的一个关键因素。为了确定出合理的封孔长度，根据Lippmann煤层失稳基本理论，选取了6种不同的弹性区本构方程，引入非线性动态瓦斯压力分布的表达式，构建了含瓦斯煤层力学理论模型，得到煤层垂直、水平应力和塑性区宽度的解析式，之后结合高家堡的现场情况，对比分析6种弹性本构方程下的煤层应力分布曲线及塑性区宽度，并进行了现场封孔试验。结果表明：封孔长度在9.5 m时孔洞漏水量小、未出现异常现象，封孔效果良好，最终确定出了合理的封孔长度为9.5 m；相对于其他3种弹性本构方程，选取第i、v、vi种弹性本构方程对封孔长度进行理论计算分析，更加符合现场实际情况。

关键词: 注水, 封孔长度, 弹性本构方程, 塑性区宽度

Abstract: The water injection into coal seam is an effective means of increasing and discharging pressure during coal mining. The sealing length is a key factor affecting the effect of water injection fracturing. To determine the reasonable sealing length, six different elastic constitutive equations were selected according to the basic theory of Lippmann coal seam instability. The expression of nonlinear dynamic gas pressure distribution was introduced, and the mechanical theory model of gas-containing coal seam was constructed. Accordingly, this study obtained the formulas for the vertical, horizontal stress and plastic zone width of coal seam. Combined with the Gaojiapu coal mine, this study compared and analysed the stress distribution curves and the plastic zone widths of the coal seam calculated by three elastic constitutive equations. Moreover, the field sealing experiment was carried out. The results show that the hole leakage is small and not abnormal when the sealing hole length is 9.5 m, which indicates the sealing effect is good and a reasonable sealing length is 9.5 m. Compared with the other three elastic constitutive equations, the calculated results by i, v and vi elastic constitutive equations well confirm with the actual length of the sealing.

Key words: water injection, sealing length, elastic constitutive equation, plastic zone width

中图分类号:

TD82

王刚，徐浩，武猛猛，王锐，宋相，周晓华,. 基于不同弹性本构方程的塑性区宽度及封孔长度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2599-2608.

WANG Gang, XU Hao, WU Meng-meng, WANG Rui, SONG Xiang, ZHOU Xiao-hua,. Study of plastic zone width and sealing length based on different elastic constitutive equations[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2599-2608.

参考文献

相关文章 11

[1]	杨赫, 程卫民, 刘震, 王文玉, 赵大伟, 王文迪. 注水煤体有效渗流通道结构分形特征核磁共振试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[2]	赵波, 张广清, 唐梅荣, 庄建满, 林灿坤, . 长期注水对致密砂岩油藏岩石力学性质影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3344-3350.
[3]	刘争宏，于永堂，唐国艺，刘智, . 安哥拉Quelo砂场地渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 177-182.
[4]	李浩，白海波，武建军，赵慧明，孟庆彬，马凯，黄卫星，郑磊，. 循环荷载下完整底板导水通道演化过程研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 447-454.
[5]	潘鹏飞，孙厚广，韩忠和，冯春，乔继延，郭汝坤，李世海，. 利用钻孔注水试验测试爆区周边岩体损伤场的可行性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 323-328.
[6]	张奇华，李玉婕，袁东，赵晓，张文辉,. 地下水封洞库水幕孔注水试验及岩体等效渗透参数分析[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2648-2658.
[7]	宋娅芬，陈从新，郑允，夏开宗，欧哲，夏天游，周意超，. 缓倾软硬岩互层边坡变形破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 487-494.
[8]	葛兆龙，梅绪东，卢义玉，夏彬伟，陈久福，. 煤矿井下水力压裂钻孔封孔力学模型及试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1907-1913.
[9]	雷国辉，宋修广，潘维宗，赵承忠. 敞开型测压管水位监测的滞后时间问题研究[J]. , 2007, 28(11): 2369-2374.
[10]	冉兴龙，李宗平，夏斌，. Theis井流注水导致的含水层水平位移与应变[J]. , 2005, 26(10): 1551-1556.
[11]	尹中民，武强，刘建军，杨春和. 注水井泄压对井壁围岩应力场的影响[J]. , 2004, 25(3): 363-368.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于不同弹性本构方程的塑性区宽度及封孔长度研究

Study of plastic zone width and sealing length based on different elastic constitutive equations

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0