岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1787-1796.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0259

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粗粒土渗透试验边壁孔隙特征及 处理层最优厚度研究

刘孟适1, 2,罗 强1,蒋良潍1,陆清元1,梁多伟1   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 中国中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-02-12 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 罗强,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事路基与土工技术的研究工作。E-mail:lqrock@home.swjtu.edu.cn E-mail:liumengshi@my.swjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘孟适,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土渗流特性的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点基础研究发展计划(“973”计划)项目(No. 2013CB036204);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51878560)。

Boundary pore characteristics and optimal treatment thickness in seepage test of coarse grained soil

LIU Meng-shi1, 2, LUO Qiang1, JIANG Liang-wei1, LU Qing-yuan1, LIANG Duo-wei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2018-02-12 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2013CB036204) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878560).

摘要: 室内渗透试验的边壁效应对粗粒土渗透系数的测定影响显著。从颗粒与边壁间孔隙的组成特征出发,根据边壁孔隙体积Vb与构成边壁孔隙的颗粒关联体积Vs之比,定义了试样边界孔隙比eb。基于等直径圆堆积原理,确立了边壁颗粒的堆积模式,构建了考虑边壁处理层厚度的边界孔隙比平面几何计算模型,并通过空间和颗粒级配修正导出了eb表达式;以eb与试样孔隙比e相等为原则,提出了确定边壁处理层最优厚度hopt的等效孔隙比法,探讨了渗透仪直径D与边壁效应的关系。研究表明:边壁引起的多余孔隙将提高边壁处的渗流速度;边壁颗粒存在两颗粒、三颗粒锐角以及三颗粒钝角3类典型平面堆积模式,与此对应的eb依次增加;hopt由试样级配、密实程度、颗粒密度、边壁颗粒堆积模式以及D等因素决定,其估算值与试验结果吻合;D超过8倍试样最大粒径后边壁效应对渗透试验结果的影响不再显著。

关键词: 渗透试验, 边壁效应, 边界孔隙比, 颗粒堆积模式, 处理层最优厚度

Abstract: Boundary effect has a significant influence on the permeability coefficient measurement of coarse grained soil in laboratory seepage tests. Based on the composition characteristics of the pore Vb between soil particles and the seepage equipment wall, a parameter called boundary pore ratio of the soil sample eb was defined according to the ratio of the volume of boundary pore Vb to the particle volume Vs which concerns the constitution of boundary pore. Furthermore, based on the uniform circle packing principle, the boundary particle accumulation patterns were established, and a plane geometric calculation model of boundary pore ratio considering the wall treatment layer thickness was proposed. The expression of eb was finally derived through space and particle gradation correction. Based on the principle of the equality of eb and sample pore ratio e, a criterion called ‘equivalent pore ratio method’ for confirming the optimal thickness of the wall treatment layer hopt was presented. At last, the relationship between the seepage equipment diameter D and the boundary effect was discussed. The researches indicate that the redundant pore caused by the boundary effect would raise the seepage velocity near the seepage boundary. There are three typical plane accumulation patterns of the boundary particles, including two particles pattern, three particles with acute packing angle pattern and three particles with obtuse packing angle pattern, of which the corresponding eb increases accordingly. Furthermore, hopt is comprehensively determined by sample gradation, compression degree, particle density, boundary particle accumulation pattern and D. The estimate value of hopt agrees well with the test result. The influence of the boundary effect on the seepage test result becomes less significant as D exceeds eight times of the maximum particle size of soil sample.

Key words: seepage test, boundary effect, boundary pore ratio, particle accumulation pattern, optimal treatment thickness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.4
[1] 左永振, 赵娜. 极端条件下心墙泥浆料的渗透反滤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 520-526.
[2] 王刚, 韦林邑, 魏星, 张建民, . 压实黏土三轴压缩变形过程中的渗透性变化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 32-38.
[3] 张淑朝,贺少辉,朱自鹏,李承辉,. 兰州富水砂卵石层土压平衡盾构渣土改良研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 279-286.
[4] 徐杨梦迪,刘建锋,徐慧宁,邹 航,胡常胜,李佳伟,. 含杂质盐岩加载全过程的渗透试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 402-408.
[5] 胡明鉴,蒋航海,朱长歧,翁贻令,阮 洋,陈伟俊, . 钙质砂的渗透特性及其影响因素探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2895-2900.
[6] 简文星 ,许 强 ,吴 韩 ,童龙云,. 三峡库区黄土坡滑坡非饱和水力参数研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3517-3522.
[7] 安 鹏 ,张爱军 ,刘宏泰 ,王 婷 . 重塑饱和黄土长期渗流劣化机制及其渗透性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(7): 1965-1971.
[8] 胡万雨 ,陈向浩 ,林 江 ,况磊强 . 瀑布沟水电站砾石土心墙初次蓄水期原位钻孔渗流试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1259-1263.
[9] 朱国胜 ,张家发 ,陈劲松 ,胡智京 . 宽级配粗粒土渗透试验尺寸效应及边壁效应研究[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2569-2574.
[10] 李建军,邵生俊,杨扶银,杨春鸣. 防渗墙粗粒土槽孔泥皮的抗渗性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1087-1093.
[11] 孔令伟,李新明,田湖南. 砂土渗透系数的细粒效应与其状态参数关联性[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 21-26.
[12] 王建秀,胡力绳,叶 冲,唐益群,杨 坪. 复杂应力路径下大理岩三轴渗透试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2389-2393.
[13] 徐 超,黄 亮,邢皓枫. 水泥-膨润土泥浆配比对防渗墙渗透性能的影响[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 422-426.
[14] 刘海宁,于怀昌,刘汉东,王思敬,王四巍. PS加固黄土力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 93-96.
[15] 徐 扬,高 谦,李 欣,李俊华,贾云喜. 土石混合体渗透性现场试坑试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 855-858.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!