岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 227-234.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0713

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于孔压静力触探的修正土类指数土体 分类方法与实例应用

邓煜晨1, 2,陈志波1, 2,郑有强3,潘生贵3   

  1. 1. 福州大学 紫金地质与矿业学院 岩土与地质工程系,福建 福州 350116;2. 福州大学 地质工程福建省高校工程研究中心,福建 福州 350116; 3. 华东勘测设计院(福建)有限公司,福建 福州 350007
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-11 修回日期:2021-09-16 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 陈志波,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程、地质工程等方面的教学与科研。E-mail: czb@fzu.edu.cn E-mail: 18756038549@163.com
  • 作者简介:邓煜晨,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事CPTU、圆孔扩张理论等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金(No. 2017J01481);华东勘测设计院(福建)有限公司科研项目(No. FH2019-KY006)。

CPTU-based modified soil behavior type index classification method and its application

DENG Yu-chen1, 2, CHEN Zhi-bo1, 2, ZHENG You-qiang3, PAN Sheng-gui3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Zijin School of Geology and Mining, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Fujian Provincial Universities Engineering Research Center of Geological Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 3. Huadong Engineering (Fujian) Corporation Limited, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China
  • Received:2021-05-11 Revised:2021-09-16 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2017J01481) and the Scientific Research Project of Huadong Engineering (Fujian) Corporation Limited (FH2019-KY006).

摘要: 孔压静力触探(piezocone penetration test,简称CPTU)常被应用于土层划分、土体分类,其各种土体分类方法有一定的适用性和局限性。引用两组实际工程案例,对5种常用的基于CPTU的土体分类图进行了分析比较。分析表明,已有分类图虽然能够区分黏性土和无黏性土,但对于粉质黏土、粉土和粉砂之间的判别均存在较大误差,且多数分类图采用过渡带分类,导致分类结果的准确性偏低。基于Robertson土类指数分类图,根据实际CPTU测试数据分类结果,对土类指数Ic进行了修正,将其同心圆模型修正为平行线模型,由此提出一种基于CPTU的修正土类指数土体分类方法。根据对实测数据的应用表明,提出的修正土类指数土体分类方法可以更好地满足土体分类,且能够满足粉质黏土、粉土和粉砂之间的判别。

关键词: 孔压静力触探(CPTU), 土体分类, 修正土类指数, 土类指数分类图

Abstract: The piezocone penetration test (CPTU) is widely applied in soil layer division and soil classification. However, its various soil classification methods have certain applicability and limitations. Five common classification charts are analyzed based on two groups of practical engineering cases. The results show that the existing classification chart can well distinguish cohesive soil and non-cohesive soil, but there are certain errors in the discrimination between silty clay, silty and silty sand. Besides, most classification charts adopt the transitional zone method, which will underestimate the classification accuracy. In this study, according to the actual test data classification results, the soil behavior type index Ic is modified through the soil behavior type index classification chart by Robertson. As a result, a new method of CPTU based modified soil behavior type index is proposed by modifying the concentric circle model to a parallel line model. The application results show that the proposed classification method can well satisfy the classification of practical engineering soil and the discrimination between silty clay, silty soil and silty sand, respectively.

Key words: piezocone penetration test (CPTU), soil classification, modified soil behavior type index, soil behavior type index classification chart

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 李洪江,童立元,刘松玉,包红燕,杨 涛, . 大直径超长灌注桩水平承载性能的参数敏感性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1825-1833.
[2] 郭 莹,王 琦. 落锥法确定粉土液限和塑限的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2569-2574.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .