岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 595-602.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0352

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于致溃程度的堤防管涌分类方法及应用

吴庆华,汪啸,张家发,张伟   

  1. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-23 接受日期:2022-05-24 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-17
  • 作者简介:吴庆华,男,1981年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事地下水资源评价与堤防险情等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费项目(No. CKSF2021488/YT);国家自然科学基金(No. 42072282);国家重点研发计划项目 (No. 2017YFC1502600)

Piping classification of dike engineering based on the risk degree and its application

WU Qing-hua, WANG Xiao, ZHANG Jia-fa, ZHANG Wei   

  1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China
  • Received:2022-03-23 Accepted:2022-05-24 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (CKSF2021488/YT), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072282) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1502600).

摘要: 管涌险情是我国堤防工程的主要险情之一,是防汛抢险一线重点关注的对象,一旦致灾,损失重大。在防汛抢险实践中发现,不同管涌险情对堤防工程的危害程度不同,但难以采取不同的措施进行处置,导致对管涌险情的抢险存在夸大或轻视的现象,其主要原因是对管涌险情的危害程度认识不足。为此,从管涌险情对堤防工程的危害程度角度出发,从管涌险情特征、作用水头差和堤防工程自身条件等方面识别了8个影响堤防险情致溃性的因子,并采用层次分析法建立了管涌险情的致溃程度评价方法。结果表明,管涌距堤脚的距离对堤防工程的危害影响最大,其次为堤外水头和管涌规模,其权重分别为0.375 5、0.202 1和0.172 3。以长江流域33个典型管涌险情案例进行管涌分类评价,分析了湖北省嘉鱼县簰洲湾和湖北省武汉市青山倒口湖管涌险情处置情况,验证了该方法的科学性和实用性。该研究成果可为管涌险情分级抢险提供技术支撑,为制定堤防险情抢险方案提供借鉴。

关键词: 堤防工程, 管涌险情, 分类方法, 致溃程度

Abstract: Piping was one of the main risks of dike engineering in China, thus it was vital to the flood control and rescue. However, in the practice of flood control and emergency rescue, the degree of damage caused by piping was different. It was difficult to take different measures to tackle the piping risks, which resulted in exaggeration or contempt for the rescue of piping. The main reason could be the lack of understanding of the piping damage degree. To this end, this paper presented the concept of collapsed piping based on the damage degree of piping to dike engineering, and developed a method for estimating piping damage degree using the analytic hierarchy process. And the quality of dike engineering, water head difference and piping risk characteristics were chosen as the main impact factors to evaluate the risk degree of piping. The results showed that the distance of piping to dike, with a weight value of 0.375 5, was the most important impact factor on the risk degree of piping, followed by the water level of outside dike with a weight value of 0.202 1, and piping scale had minimal effect with a weight value of 0.172 3. The risk degrees of 33 typical piping appeared in the Yangtze River, were assessed by using the analytic hierarchy process. Moreover, the two piping risks happened in Qingshan district of Wuhan city (2016) and Paizhouwan of Jiayu county, Hubei province (1998), were contrastively analyzed with the traditional empirical method and the analytic hierarchy process method, respectively, which showed that the analytic hierarchy process was more scientific and practical. The results can provide technical support for the classification of piping hazard and dike rescue.

Key words: dike engineering, piping, classification method, degree of risk

中图分类号: 

  • TV 64
[1] 顾冲时 ,汪自力 ,刘成栋,. 堤防工程安全评估专家赋权模型[J]. , 2006, 27(12): 2099-2104.
[2] 钱玉林 ,张亚中 ,周雪勤 ,殷宗泽,. 试论软弱筑堤土的固结效应[J]. , 2004, 25(7): 1175-1178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .