›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 1231-1236.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

各向异性软岩的变形与渗流耦合特性试验研究

李 燕1,杨林德2,董志良1,张功新1   

  1. 1.中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广州 510230;2.同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2007-10-18 出版日期:2009-05-10 发布日期:2011-02-18
  • 作者简介:李燕,女,1978年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程渗流方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 50378069)。

Experimental research on characteristic of deformation and hydromechanical coupling of anistropic rock

LI Yan1, YANG Lin-de2, DONG Zhi-liang1, ZHANG Gong-xin1   

  1. 1. Engineering Technology Research Institute of CCCC Forth Harbor Engineering Bureau, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2007-10-18 Online:2009-05-10 Published:2011-02-18

摘要:

根据泥质粉砂岩和泥岩在垂直和平行于层理面的条件下进行的三轴压缩和渗流试验,得到了不同围压及岩石成层条件下泥质粉砂岩和泥岩的弹性模量,建立了基于层理面夹角和围压的软岩弹性模量控制方程。渗透张量与应力的耦合关系是各向异性渗流耦合分析的关键问题,通过引入应力主轴与渗透主轴非一致时渗透张量与应力的响应关系,建立了各向异性渗透张量与应力耦合的控制方程,并对比了试验数据与计算结果,为各向异性软岩渗流应力耦合分析模型的建立奠定了理论基础。

Abstract:

Based on triaxial compression and permeability test of brown mudstone and clayey siltstone perpendicular to and parallel with bedding planes, the change rule of elastic moduli of brown mudstone and clayey siltstone is obtained. And elastic modulus expression of soft rock is proposed with different confining pressures and angles of bedding plane. Coupling relation between permeability tensor and stresses is key problem in hydromechanical coupling analysis of anistropic rock. The stress-dependent permeability tensor of soft rock is introduced where principal stresses do not coincide with the principal permeabilities, so control equation of stress-permeability relationship is presented. Measured data and calculation results are compared. And these can be used in the research of the model of hydromechanical coupling in anisotropic soft rock.

Key words: anisotropy, soft rock, hydromechanical coupling, deformation

中图分类号: 

  • U 456.1
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李利平,李术才,崔金声. 岩溶突水治理浆材的试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3642 -3648 .
[2] 郦建俊,黄茂松,王卫东,陈 峥. 软土地基中扩底抗拔中长桩的极限承载力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2643 -2650 .
[3] 孟庆山,杨 超,雷学文,孙士玲. 武汉东湖淤泥早强固化试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 707 -712 .
[4] 张先伟,王常明,李军霞,马栋和,陈多才. 蠕变条件下软土微观孔隙变化特性[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1061 -1067 .
[5] 崔文杰,姚仰平. 渐近状态土压力计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3574 -3578 .
[6] 田 威,党发宁,陈厚群. 基于细观损伤的混凝土破裂过程的三维数值模拟与CT试验验证[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 428 -433 .
[7] 卢应发,陈朱蕾,谢文良,吕志中. 垃圾卫生填埋中的一些岩土工程技术[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 91 -98 .
[8] 田景元,刘汉龙,李永红. 土石坝下游坝坡砌块在地震作用下的稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 135 -138 .
[9] 郭忠贤,王占雷,杨志红. 高层建筑刚性桩复合地基反力现场测试研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 163 -168 .
[10] 王志萍,胡敏云,夏玲涛. 垃圾填土压缩特性的室内试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1681 -1686 .