›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (7): 1929-1936.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.07.013

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental analysis of bearing behavior of geosynthetic encased stone columns

OUYANG Fang1,ZHANG Jian-jing1,FU Xiao1,HAN Jian-wei2,YAN Kong-ming1,DU Lin1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Guangxi Institute of Construction Science & Research, Nanning, Guangxi 530221, China
  • Received:2015-09-26 Online:2016-07-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Defense Basic Scientific Research Program of China (B0220133003).

Abstract: A model experiment is conducted to study the bearing mechanism of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Bearing capacity, end resistance, deformation, destruction of the columns with different stiffnesses and lengths of encasements are analyzed. The radial deformation of the columns is measured by self-made radial deformation measurement instruments in the experiment. It can be found from the experiment results that the fully encased stone columns effectively improve the bearing capacity and stiffness of the stone column installing on hard soil layer. And the one with a larger modulus of elasticity of encasement material has the higher bearing capacity and stiffness. However, the partially encased stone column with an encasement length of 60% of the column length does not have significant advantages over the stone column. This is because the load capacity characteristic, deformation property, and failure mode of the fully encased stone column are different from those of the partially encased stone column. The load transmitted to the fully encased stone columns tip is higher than that of the partially encased stone column and the stone column. The deformation along the fully encased stone columns distributes more uniform compared to that of the partially encased stone column. And the maximum radial deformation along the fully encased stone column is lower at a certain pressure. What's more, the fully encased stone columns fail from penetrating into the upper cushion; while the uncased part of the partially encased stone column undergoes excess bulging.

Key words: geosynthetic encased stone column, model experiment, soft clay, encasement

CLC Number: 

  • TU 473

[1] XU Gang, ZHANG Chun-hui, YU Yong-jiang, . Experiments of overburden breaking and compression frame of fully mechanized caving face and the prediction model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] WANG Yu-ke, WAN Yong-shuai, FANG Hong-yuan, ZENG Chang-nü, SHI Ming-sheng, WU Di, . Experimental study of cyclic behavior of soft clay under circle stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[3] REN Lian-wei, CAO Hui, KONG Gang-qiang. Treatment effect of reagent injection mixing ratio on soft clay improved by chemical electroosmosis method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[4] REN Yu-xiao, YAN Yue, FU Deng-feng. Study of axial resistance of subsea pipe on shallow foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[5] MI Bo, XIANG Yan-yong, . Model experiment and calculation analysis of excavation-seepage stability for shallow shield tunneling in sandy ground [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[6] CHEN He, ZHANG Yu-fang, ZHANG Xin-min, WEI Shao-wei, . Full-scale model experiments on anti-sliding characteristics of high-pressure grouting steel-tube micropiles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[7] SUN Hong, SONG Chun-yu, TENG Mu-wei, GE Xiu-run. Pore evolution characteristics of soft clay under loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[8] DAI Guo-liang, ZHU Wen-bo, GUO Jing, GONG Wei-ming, ZHAO Xue-liang, . Experiments on vertical uplift bearing capacity of suction caisson foundation in soft clay [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[9] ZHANG Zhi-guo, LI Sheng-nan, ZHANG Cheng-ping, WANG Zhi-wei, . Analysis of stratum deformation and lining response induced by shield construction considering influences of underground water level rise and fall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[10] YE Guan-bao, ZHENG Wen-qiang, ZHANG Zhen, . Investigation on distribution of negative friction of frictional piles in large filling sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 440-448.
[11] WANG Dong-po, CHEN Zheng, HE Si-ming, CHEN Ke-jian, LIU Fa-ming, LI Ming-qing, . Physical model experiments of dynamic interaction between debris flow and bridge pier model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[12] LUO Qing-zi, CHEN Xiao-ping, YUAN Bing-xiang, FENG De-luan, . Deformation behavior and consolidation model of soft soil under flexible lateral constraint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2264-2274.
[13] LUO Lin-ge, CUI Li-chuan, SHI Hai-yang, GUO Chao, YI Shao-ping, . Experimental study of bearing capacity of underground diaphragm wall-gravity anchorage composite foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 1049-1058.
[14] LEI Hua-yang, LIU Guang-xue, ZHOU Jun, . Bearing property and failure mode of double-layer soft clay grounds in a dredger fill site [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[15] GUO Shuai-jie, SONG Xu-guo, . Jacking resistance evaluation method of prefabricated diaphragm wall based on laboratory experiment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!