›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2765-2770.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2419

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Limit analysis on yield acceleration and failure model of reinforced soil retaining walls using two-wedge method

XU Peng1, 2, JIANG Guan-lu1, 2, QIU Jun-jie1, LIN Zhan-zhan2, WANG Zhi-meng3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of High-speed Railway Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2016-10-13 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Project of Science and Technology Research and Development Plan of China Railway Corporation (2014G003-C).

Abstract: Reinforced soil retaining walls are widely used in the civil engineering because of their excellent seismic performance. The study on the seismic design method of reinforced soil retaining walls is particularly important. To analyze the effect of arrangement and tensile strength of reinforcement on the yield acceleration, the equation of coefficient of yield acceleration is derived based on limit analysis theory assuming a two-wedge form of the failure mode. Compared with the values calculated by the design codes, the results obtained by the proposed method are closer to the experimental test and the numerical simulation. Meanwhile, the proposed method can reflect the real failure mode of the models. Parametric analysis shows that: the yield acceleration increases gradually with the increase of the tensile strength of the reinforcement, especially when the reinforcement is longer; the yield acceleration decreases with the increase of vertical spacing of the reinforcement; the width of the panel facing barely affect the yield acceleration; compared with the width of the panel facing, the tensile strength and the vertical spacing of the reinforcement impact significantly on the failure shape.

Key words: reinforced soil retaining wall, limit analysis, two-wedge method, yield acceleration, reinforcement

CLC Number: 

  • TU 433

[1] CHU Feng, ZHANG Hong-gang, SHAO Sheng-jun, DENG Guo-hua, . Experimental study on mechanical deformation and corrosion resistance characteristics of loess reinforced with synthetic waste cloth fiber yarn [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[2] LIU Ke-qi, DING Wan-tao, CHEN Rui, HOU Ming-lei. Construction of three-dimensional failure model of shield tunnel face and calculation of the limit supporting force [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2293-2303.
[3] DUAN Jun-yi, YANG Guo-lin, HU Min, QIU Ming-ming, YU Yun, . Experimental study on deformation characteristics of reinforced soil cushion subjected to loading and unloading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2333-2341.
[4] TONG Xing, YUAN Jing, JIANG Ye-xiang, LIU Xing-wang, LI Ying, . Calculation of layered unloading additional stress of foundation pit based on Mindlin solution and the analysis of multiple factors influencing the rebound deformation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[5] XIAO Shi-guo, LIU Hang, YU Xin-zuo. Analysis method of seismic overall stability of soil slopes retained by gravity walls anchored horizontally with flexible reinforcements [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[6] RONG Chi, CHEN Wei-zhong, YUAN Jing-qiang, ZHANG Zheng, ZHANG Yi, ZHANG Qing-yan, LIU Qi, . Study on new sodium silicate-ester grouting material and its properties of grouted-sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2034-2042.
[7] CHEN He, ZHANG Yu-fang, ZHANG Xin-min, WEI Shao-wei, . Full-scale model experiments on anti-sliding characteristics of high-pressure grouting steel-tube micropiles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[8] LI Jian, CHEN Shan-xiong, YU Fei, JIANG Ling-fa, DAI Zhang-jun. Discussion on mechanism of reinforcing high and steep slope with prestressed anchor cable [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[9] SHI Li, HU Dong-dong, CAI Yuan-qiang, PAN Xiao-dong, SUN Hong-lei, . Preliminary study of real-time pore water pressure response and reinforcement mechanism of air-booster vacuum preloading treated dredged slurry [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 185-193.
[10] SUN Lai-bin, XIAO Shi-guo, . Evaluation method for elastic foundation coefficient of finite downslope soil against loading segment of stabilizing piles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 278-284.
[11] XIAO Yao, DENG Hua-feng, LI Jian-lin, ZHI Yong-yan, XIONG Yu. The deterioration effect of fractured rock mass strengthened by grouting method under long-term immersion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[12] TANG Guo-yi, LIU Zhi, LIU Zheng-hong, TANG Li-jun, YU Yong-tang, JIANG Wen, . Application of low energy level dynamic compaction method to Angola Quelo sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 203-209.
[13] ZHI Yong-yan, DENG Hua-feng, XIAO Yao, DUAN Ling-ling, CAI Jia, LI Jian-lin. Analysis of seepage characteristics of fractured rock mass reinforced by microbial grouting [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[14] HE Fa-guo, LÜ Ran, SU Hua-zhong, ZHOU Jin, ZHANG Jing-ke, WANG Nan, . Durability test and reinforced mechanism on adding SH materials into soil of archaeological sites [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 297-307.
[15] LIU Shun-qing, HUANG Xian-wen, ZHOU Ai-zhao, CAI GUO-jun, JIANG Peng-ming, . A stability analysis method of soil-rock slope based on random block stone model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!