›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 251-257.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0309

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental and model analysis of permeability of coal sample from Qinshui basin under hydrostatic pressure conditions

WANG Wei1,2, FANG Zhi-ming1,2, LI Xiao-chun1,2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2018-03-05 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National key Research and Development of China(2018YFB06501) and the General Program of National Science Foundation of China(41472236).

Abstract: In order to study the permeability evolution of coal sample from Qinshui basin, an experimental device based on the transient pressure pulse-decay method for measuring the permeability of coal sample is developed. Permeability measurements using N2 and CO2 are conducted under common laboratory conditions which include constant pore pressure and variable confining pressures, constant effective stress and constant confining pressure and variable pore pressures. The Connell model is used to analyze the testing data. The reasons for the difference between the model prediction and the experimental value are discussed. The results show that: (1) The permeability of coal decreased with the increase of effective stress under constant confining pressure and variable pore pressures; the permeability of coal decreased with the increase of pore pressure under equivalent effective stress; as the pore pressure increased, the permeability of coal first decreased and then increased under the condition of constant confining pressure and variable pore pressures. (2) The permeability value predicted by the Connell model for constant confining pressure and variable pore pressures is greater than the experimental value. The difference between the permeability prediction and the experimental value may be due to the estimation error of the fracture compressibility and the adsorption strain coefficient. By carrying out permeability experiments and model studies in laboratory, it is of great significance to guide the experiment and simulation researches of CO2 sequestration and gas displacement in laboratory.

Key words: permeability of coal, transient pressure pulse-decay method, model prediction, fracture compressibility coefficient, adsorption strain coefficient

CLC Number: 

  • TQ573

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!