›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 3915-3920.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0329

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research •     Next Articles

Stress dilatancy of rockfill material under different loading directions

KONG Xian-jing1, 2, ZHU Fa-yong1, 2, LIU Jing-mao1, 2, 3, ZOU De-gao1, 2, NING Fan-wei1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Earthquake Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116024, China; 2. School of Hydraulic Engineering, Faculty of infrastructure Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, Liaoning, 116024, China
  • Received:2017-03-22 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC0404902), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678113,51608095,51779034) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT17ZD219).

Abstract: Dilatancy, representing the plastic flow direction of granular material, is an important part in elastic-plastic constitutive model. So far, the dilatancy equation of rockfill is mainly obtained by the conventional triaxial test, and it is not clear whether these dilatancy equations can reflect the dilatancy law of rockfill under different stress paths. In this paper, tests with four different stress paths, including constant confining pressure , constant axial stress , constant mean effective stress p, and constant principal stress ratio are conducted to study the influence of stress paths on the dilatancy. The results show that: the dilatancy ratio is linearly associated with the stress ratio under different paths, but there is no consistent relationship between the dilatancy ratio and the stress ratio; the dilatancy line translates and rotates with the stress increment direction in the - space, and the slope parameter and the intercept parameter are increased with the increase of ; the existing dilatancy equations cannot well describe the dilatancy relationship under different stress paths, and a modified dilatancy equation considering the stress increment direction is proposed and verified.

Key words: stress paths, dilatancy, rockfill material, stress increment direction, elastic-plasticity

CLC Number: 

  • TU 411
[1] YUAN Qing-meng, KONG Liang, ZHAO Ya-peng, . An elastoplastic model for energy soils considering filling and bonding effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] WANG feng, ZHANG Jian-qing, . Study of breakage behaviour of original rockfill materials considering size effect on particle strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(1): 87-94.
[3] KONG Liang, LIU Wen-zhuo, YUAN Qing-meng, DONG Tong, . Triaxial tests on gassy sandy soil under constant shear stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3319-3326.
[4] LIU Si-hong, SHEN Chao-min, MAO Hang-yu, SUN Yi. State-dependent elastoplastic constitutive model for rockfill materials [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[5] DING Yan-hui, ZHANG Bing-yin, QIAN Xiao-xiang, YIN Yin, SUN Xun, . Experimental study of the characteristics of wetting deformation of rockfill materials [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 2975-2981.
[6] ZHANG Ling-kai, WANG Rui, ZHANG Jian-min, TANG Xin-jun, . A static and dynamic constitutive model of rockfill material considering particle breakage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
[7] KONG Xian-jing, NING Fan-wei, LIU Jing-mao, ZOU De-gao, ZHOU Chen-guang, . Influences of stress paths and saturation on particle breakage of rockfill materials [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[8] LI Jian-peng, GAO Ling, MU Huan-sheng. Dilatancy characteristics of sandstone and its function of dilatancy angle under high confining pressure and unloading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[9] HE Zi-lu, LIU Wei, HE Si-ming, YAN Shuai-xing, . Shear dilatancy mechanism and process simulation of rapid sliding of saturated loose deposits [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[10] WANG Feng-yun, QIAN De-ling, . Dilatancy analysis for a circular tunnel excavated in rock mass based on unified strength theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[11] ZHOU Hui, CHENG Guang-tan, ZHU Yong, CHEN Jun, LU Jing-jing, CUI Guo-jian, YANG Pin-qing, . Experimental study of shear deformation characteristics of marble dentate joints [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[12] LU Yong, ZHOU Guo-qing , YANG Dong-ying, SONG Jia-qing, . Explicit calculation of sand unified model combining shear dilatancy softening and shear shrinkage hardening [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[13] DONG Jian-xun, LIU Hai-xiao, LI Zhou. A bounding surface plasticity model of sand for cyclic loading analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[14] GUO Wan-li, CAI Zheng-yin, WU Ying-li, HUANG Ying-hao. Study on the particle breakage energy and dilatancy of coarse-grained soils [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[15] GUO Ying, LIU Xiao-dong. Influence of sample-preparing methods on CD test results of saturated silty sand in different stress paths [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3783-3788.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!