Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2039-2049.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1861

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Experimental study of the rockburst model material with low-strength and high-brittleness

ZHOU Hui1, 2, CHEN Jun1, 2, ZHANG Chuan-qing1, 2, ZHU Yong1, 2, LU Jing-jing1, 2, JIANG Yue1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2017-09-11 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51427803, 51409102), the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB046902) and the Scientific Instrument Developing Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (YZ201553, YZ201344).

Abstract: The excavation unloading activities in deep hard rock tunnels often induce high-intensity rockburst disasters, which has become a key issue affecting the safety construction of tunnels. The physical model test is an important method to study the deep tunnel excavation, and the properties of model materials have great influences on the testing results. Thus, it is the key to prepare materials suitable for the physical model test. Based on the development of the traditional rockburst model materials, this paper introduces the rockburst proneness index and brittleness evaluation index. Combing with the orthogonal design method and sensitivity analysis, the experiments were carried out to investigate the rockburst model materials with low-strength and high-brittleness. We analyzed five influencing factors, including the quartz sand content, barite content, water content and the mass ratio of high-strength gypsum and cement. Each factor was set at five levels, a total of 25 matching schemes. The material strength, mechanical parameters, rockburst proneness index and brittleness evaluation index of model materials were measured in each matching scheme, and the variation of these parameters and indexes were studied under different design levels. Finally, the relationships among the influencing factors, rockburst proneness and brittleness of the selected rockburst model materials were discussed. The results show that: 1) According to the rockburst proneness index and brittleness evaluation index, the prepared model materials meet the requirements of the physical model tests. 2) It is important to control the contents of barite powder and water and to adjust the mass ratio of high-strength gypsum to cement properly.

Key words: brittle rock, rockburst, model material, brittleness index

CLC Number: 

  • TU 451
[1] SHAO Chang-yue, PAN Peng-zhi, ZHAO De-cai, YAO Tian-bo, MIAO Shu-ting, YU Pei-yang, . Effect of pumping rate on hydraulic fracturing breakdown pressure and pressurization rate [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2411-2421.
[2] CHEN Bing-rui, FENG Xia-ting, FU Qi-qing, WANG Bo, ZHU Xin-hao, LI Tao, LU Cai-ping, XIA Huan, . Integration and high precision intelligence microseismic monitoring technology and its application in deep rock engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2422-2431.
[3] GAO Feng, CAO Shan-peng, XIONG Xin, ZHOU Ke-ping, ZHU Long-yin, . Brittleness evolution characteristics of cyan sandstone under freeze-thaw cycles [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 445-452.
[4] ZHANG Chao, YANG Qi-jun, CAO Wen-gui, . Study of damage constitutive model of brittle rock considering post-peak stress dropping rate [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(8): 3099-3106.
[5] LI Tong, FENG Xia-ting, WANG Rui, XIAO Ya-xun, WANG Yong, FENG Guang-liang, YAO Zhi-bin, NIU Wen-jing, . Characteristics of rockburst location deflection and its microseismic activities in a deep tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(7): 2847-2854.
[6] SU Guo-shao, YAN Si-zhou, YAN Zhao-fu, ZHAI Shao-bin, YAN Liu-bin, . Evolution characteristics of acoustic emission in rockburst process under true-triaxial loading conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(5): 1673-1682.
[7] LUO Dan-ni, SU Guo-shao, HE Bao-yu, . True triaxial test on rockburst of granites with different water saturations [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1331-1340.
[8] YAN Jian, HE Chuan, WANG Bo, MENG Wei, . Influence of high geotemperature on rockburst occurrence in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1543-1550.
[9] MEI Shi-ming, HU Xiao-chuan, SU Guo-shao, CHEN Guan-yan, . Model test study of the influence of intermediate principal stress on rockburst in tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[10] ZHAO Fei, WANG Hong-jian, HE Man-chao, YUAN Guang-xiang, LUO Yao-wu, . Acoustic emission characteristics of granite specimens with different heights in rockburst tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 135-146.
[11] WANG Zhi-dong, LI Li-yun, CHEN Tao, LIU Bing-quan, . Study of energy release in model tests on pillar rockburst [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 177-185.
[12] ZHU Si-tao, JIANG Fu-xing, ZHU Hai-zhou, ZHANG Jun-jie, LIAN Hong-quan, HAN Guo-qing, . Study of mechanism of rockburst accident in heading face in high stress area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[13] XIANG Peng, JI Hong-guang, CAI Mei-feng, ZHANG Yue-zheng. Dynamic energy release mechanism and geometric scale feature of ejection rockburst source [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 457-466.
[14] SI Xue-feng, GONG Feng-qiang, LUO Yong, LI Xi-bing, . Experimental simulation on rockburst process of deep three-dimensional circular cavern [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 621-634.
[15] MA Chun-chi, LI Tian-bin, ZHANG Hang, WANG Jian-feng,. An evaluation and early warning method for rockburst based on EMS microseismic source parameters [J]. , 2018, 39(2): 765-774.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!