Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2108-2118.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0608

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Model test on potential failure surface characteristics of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall

ZHAO Xiao-yan1, FAN Yu-fei1, LIU Liang2, JIANG Chu-sheng3   

  1. 1. Department of Geological Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. China Railway Southwest Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China; 3. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China)
  • Received:2018-06-19 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41672295) and the Science and Technology Project of Department of Transportation of Sichuan Province(2015B1-1).

Abstract: The current design methods for the railway stepped reinforced soil retaining walls are still immature, which fails to satisfy the requirement of railway slope reinforcement practice. For the design of reinforced soil retaining walls, accurate determination of the potential failure surface is the key issue. However, though current specifications clearly address the shape and location of the potential failure surface, they limit their use only in single walls with a height of no more than 10 m. This paper attempts to identify the characteristics of potential failure surfaces in stepped reinforced soil retaining walls under railway loads by the use of model test. The model was designed with a large scale of 1:4 and the railway load was stimulated by a specific cyclic surcharge load. The shape and location of the potential failure surface were determined by the comprehensive analysis of the slope surface lateral displacements, vertical settlements at the slope crust and strains of the geogrid at different investigation points. The result illustrated: the potential failure surface in the lower stage wall is similar to that given by the “0.3H” method but has a deeper location and a more gentle inclination of the bottom part, which indicate a larger potential unstable area; while the shape of the potential failure surface in the upper stage wall is generally similar to the Ranking’s active rupture, however it thrusts into the lower stage wall rather than thrusts out from the foot of the upper stage wall. The test results and conclusions drawn in this study can provide theoretical reference for the design of railway stepped reinforced soil retaining wall.

Key words: stepped reinforced soil retaining wall, model test, potential failure surface, rail load

CLC Number: 

  • U215
[1] ZHANG Lei, HAI Wei-shen, GAN Hao, CAO Wei-ping, WANG Tie-hang, . Study on bearing behavior of flexible single pile subject to horizontal and uplift combined load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[2] HUANG Wei, XIAO Wei-min, TIAN Meng-ting, ZHANG Lin-hao, . Model test research on the mechanical properties of irregular columnar jointed rock masses [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[3] ZOU Xin-jun, CAO Xiong, ZHOU Chang-lin, . Model study on the bearing behavior of V-H combined loaded pile in sand considering the current effects [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[4] CHENG Yong-hui, HU Sheng-gang, WANG Han-wu, ZHANG Cheng. Study on depth effect of pressuremeter feature parameters in deep buried sand [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[5] NING Yi-bing, TANG Hui-ming, ZHANG Bo-cheng, SHEN Pei-wu, ZHANG Guang-cheng, XIA Ding, . Investigation of the rock similar material proportion based on orthogonal design and its application in base friction physical model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[6] PU He-fu, PAN You-fu, KHOTEJA Dibangar, ZHOU Yang. Model test on dewatering of high-water-content dredged slurry by flocculation-horizontal vacuum two-staged method [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[7] LIU Gong-xun, LI Wei, HONG Guo-jun, ZHANG Kun-yong, CHEN Xiu-han, SHI Shao-gang, RUTTEN Tom. Sandstone failure characteristics in large-scale cutting model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[8] TANG Ming-gao, LI Song-lin, XU Qiang, GONG Zheng-feng, ZHU Quan, WEI Yong. Study of deformation characteristics of reservoir landslide based on centrifugal model test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[9] SONG Ding-bao, PU He-fu, CHEN Bao-guo, MENG Qing-da, . Model test on mechanical behavior of rigid load shedding culvert under high fill [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[10] HOU Gong-yu, HU Tao, LI Zi-xiang, XIE Bing-bing, XIAO Hai-lin, ZHOU Tian-ci, . Experimental study on overburden deformation evolution under mining effect based on distributed fiber optical sensing technology [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[11] WANG Guo-hui, CHEN Wen-hua, NIE Qing-ke, CHEN Jun-hong, FAN Hui-hong, ZHANG Chuan, . Impacts of pit excavation on foundation piles in deep silty soil by centrifugal model tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[12] LEI Hua-yang, HU Yao, LEI Shuang-hua, QI Zi-yang, XU Ying-gang, . Analysis of microstructure characteristics of air-booster vacuum preloading for ultra-soft dredger fills [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[13] YU Yi-fan, WANG Ping, WANG Hui-juan, XU Shu-ya, GUO Hai-tao, . Physical model test of seismic dynamic response to accumulative landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[14] CHEN Yu-long, UCHIMURA Taro, . Early warning of rainfall-induced landslides based on elastic wave velocity [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[15] WANG Qin-ke, MA Jian-lin, CHEN Wen-long, YANG Yan-xin, HU Zhong-bo, . Centrifugal model tests and calculation method of uplift bearing capacity of rock-socketed pedestal pile overburden soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!