Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 99-108.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1103

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Impacts of mining-induced stress concentration on coal-bed methane drainage in boreholes parallel with bedding

PENG Shou-jian1, GUO Shi-chao1, XU Jiang1, GUO Chen-ye2, ZHANG Chao-lin1, JIA Li1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China; 2. Chongqing Energy Technology Investment Group Company Limited,Chongqing 400060, China
  • Received:2018-06-23 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC0808303), the Basic and Frontier Research Projects of Chongqing (cstc2016jcyjA0117, cstc2018jcyjAX0626), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017CDJQJ248825).

Abstract: The self-developed multi-field coupling test system is applied in the physical simulation of coal-bed methane (CBM) drainage in boreholes along seam, considering different stress concentration conditions caused by mining activities. The evolution of coal-bed gas pressure, gas drainage rate at boreholes, stress sensitivity coefficient, and permeability at stress released and concentrated zones during coal-bed methane drainage process, and the initial stress regions are analyzed. The experiment results show that (1) In the drainage process, the coal seam gas pressure decreased rapidly at the early stage, and then declines steadily. The gas drainage flow rate is much larger in regions closer to the borehole than far from it. In the periphery of the borehole, the gas pressure gradient increases at first and then decreases a certain period later. (2) During the mining process, the coefficient of stress concentration increases, while the permeability of coal seam and coal-bed methane flow decrease. The minimum drainage amount of coal-bed methane is located at Region 1 characterized with maximum stress concentration, while the maximum drainage amount is located at the stress released zones with minimum stress state. (3) The stress sensitivity coefficient in the stress concentration zone, which is characterized as the slowest decline rate of dimensionless permeability, is higher than that of stress released zones and initial stress regions.

Key words: coal seam, coal-bed methane(CBM) drainage, mining stress, coal seam gas pressure, drainage flow

CLC Number: 

  • TD712
[1] YANG He, CHENG Wei-min, LIU Zhen, WANG Wen-yu, ZHAO Da-wei, WANG Wen-di. Fractal characteristics of effective seepage channel structure of water infusion coal based on NMR experiment [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1279-1286.
[2] LI Dong, LU Yi-yu, RONG Yao, ZHOU Dong-ping, GUO Chen-ye, ZHANG Shang-bin, ZHANG Cheng-ke, . Rapid uncovering seam technologies for large cross-section gas tunnel excavated through coal seams using directional hydraulic fracturing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 363-369.
[3] YUAN Liang, LIU Ye-jiao, TIAN Zhi-chao, TANG Chun-an, XUE Jun-hua, DUAN Chang-rui, ZHANG Han, . Numerical test and application of gas pre-drainage in an extra-thick seam by using ground vertical boreholes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 370-378.
[4] HE Man-chao, GAO Yu-bing, YANG Jun, WANG Jian-wen, WANG Ya-jun, ZHU Zhen, . Engineering experimentation of gob-side entry retaining formed by roof cutting and pressure release in a thick-seam fast-extracted mining face [J]. , 2018, 39(1): 254-264.
[5] WANG Bei-fang, LIANG Bing, SUN Ke-ming, WU Zhan-chao,SUN Wei-ji, JIANG Li-guo, WANG Jun-guang,. Research on overlying strata response and control during typical shallow coal seam longwall mining [J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2693-2700.
[6] HE Tuan, MAO De-bing, HUANG Zhi-zeng, SUN Xiao-dong, ZHANG Xue-liang, . Stability evaluation and protection technology of waterproof segment pillar with fully-mechanized caving of ultra-thick coal seam [J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1148-1153.
[7] HOU Yun-bing, HE Shang-sen, XIE Sheng-rong,. Damage and rupture laws of main roof between coal seams with a close distance [J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2989-2999.
[8] WANG Qi, FAN Yun-ping, LI Gang, GUO Wen-xiao, YAN Dian-hua, ZHANG Li-ping,. Determination of coal pillar width between roadways of fully mechanised caving face with double roadways layout in a thick coal seam [J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3009-3016.
[9] YANG Deng-feng,ZHANG Lin-fan,CHAI Mao,LI Bo,BAI Yi-fei,. Study of roof breaking law of fully mechanized top coal caving mining in ultra-thick coal seam based on fracture mechanics [J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2033-2039.
[10] LIU Chuan-xiao , WANG Long, LIU Xing-hui, ZHUANG Shuai, YU Shao-bo,. Experimental study of evolving stress relaxation system of deep coal seam and its dynamic analysis [J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1588-1596.
[11] LU Pei-qing, LI Gen-sheng, HUANG Zhong-wei, SONG Xian-zhi, SHENG Mao, HE Zhen-guo. Establishment and solution of a dynamic and static response numerical model for pulsating hydro-fracturing in coal seams [J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1471-1480.
[12] CHANG Ju-cai, XIE Guang-xiang, ZHANG Xue-hui. Analysis of rib spalling mechanism of fully-mechanized top-coal caving face with great mining height in extra-thick coal seam [J]. , 2015, 36(3): 803-808.
[13] CHENG Liang , LU Yi-yu , GE Zhao-long , DING Hong , ZHONG Ding-yun,. Initiation pressure calculation model and judgment criterion for hydraulic fracturing of inclined coal seam [J]. , 2015, 36(2): 444-450.
[14] ZHENG Peng-qiang, CHEN Wei-zhong, MENG Xiang-jun, DENG Xiao-lin, LI Wei-qing, BIAN Jing-qiang,. Study of parameter optimization of support in deep steeply inclined roadway with unsymmetrical loadings [J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 429-436.
[15] WANG Ai-wen , PAN Yi-shan , LI Zhong-hua , LIU Chun-sheng, . Similar experimental study of rockburst induced by mining deep coal seam under fault action [J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2486-2492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!