Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (11): 3318-3326.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0932

• Numerical Analysis • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Parameter inversion and application of soft soil modified Cambridge model

YU Hong1, CHEN Xiao-bin1, 2, YI Li-qin1, QIU Jun1, GU Zheng-hao3, ZHAO Hui4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2.Key MOE Laboratory of Heavy Haul Railway Engineering, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. Huzhou South the Taihu Lake Municipal Construction Co., Ltd. Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China; 4. China Communications Shanghai Waterway Bureau Co., Ltd. Shanghai 200002, China
  • Received:2023-06-27 Accepted:2023-10-08 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-11-29
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978674).

Abstract: The reasonable value of soil constitutive parameters is an important prerequisite for numerical simulation. In order to accurately obtain the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for Huzhou soft soil, a parameter inversion method for the modified Cambridge model based on laboratory experiments and neural networks was developed for two typical soft soils in the region. Firstly, laboratory triaxial consolidation undrained tests and standard consolidation rebound tests were conducted, and based on the test results, the parameter inversion interval of the modified Cambridge model for typical soft soil in Huzhou region was determined. Secondly, based on the principle of orthogonal experimental design, numerical calculations were conducted on the lateral displacement of the retaining structure at different parameter levels during the excavation process of the foundation pit. Based on the numerical calculation results, 64 sets of PSO-BP neural network training samples were constructed. Finally, the constructed training set was used to invert the parameters of the modified Cambridge model for soft soils in Huzhou area. The critical state effective stress ratio (M1, M2), compression parameter (λ1λ2), rebound parameter (κ1κ2), and void ratio (e1、e2) of the two typical soft soil modified Cambridge model parameters obtained through inversion were M1=1.076、λ=0.050、κ=0.021、e1=1.712,M2=1.123、λ2=0.038、κ2=0.012,e2=0.967. The predicted deformation values of the retaining structure calculated through inversion parameters were in good agreement with the measured values, with a relative error of no more than 5%. Based on the inversion parameters, finite element numerical calculation was used to predict the deformation of the foundation pit, and the prediction results verified the accuracy of the inversion method. The influence of the number of neural network training samples and the number of input layer nodes on the inversion results of the Cambridge model parameters for soft soil correction was analyzed. The research results can provide parameter support and technical guidance for similar foundation pit projects in Huzhou area.

Key words: machine learning, artificial intelligence, geotechnical engineering, forecast, algorithm

CLC Number: 

  • TU 447
[1] LIU Tian-xiang, ZHU Hong-hu, WU Bing, LI Hao-jie, HU Le-le, . Progressive failure mechanism of embedded strain sensing cable-frozen soil interface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(1): 131-140.
[2] WU Shuang-shuang, HU Xin-li, SUN Shao-rui, WEI Ji-hong, . A case study of mechanism for intermittent deformation and early warning of landslides [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(增刊): 593-602.
[3] WANG Zhi-chao, PENG Yi-qin, QIN Yun, TIAN Ying-hui, LUO Guang-cai, . Stress-induced anisotropic subloading surface model for overconsolidated soil based on unified yield criterion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1891-1900.
[4] QIU Xiang, LI Jin-hong, ZENG Bo, FU Hong-yuan, LUO Zhen-yu, CHEN Jing-cheng, LIU Zhong-wei, . Wetting deformation characteristics of high liquid limit red clay under low stress condition [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 2028-2040.
[5] DONG Xue-chao, GUO Ming-wei, WANG Shui-lin, . Sinking state prediction and optimal sensor placement of super large open caissons based on LightGBM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(6): 1789-1799.
[6] MA En-lin, LAI Jin-xing, WANG Li-xin, WANG Ke, LEI Sheng-xiang, LI Chu-jun, QIU Jun-ling, . Deformation prediction during underground construction based on traction algorithm in control phases [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(2): 577-594.
[7] WANG Zu-le, KONG De-qiong, DU Yue-ming, ZHU Bin, . Extension and validation of sequential limit analysis for geotechnical problems [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(12): 3531-3540.
[8] ZHOU Hao, CHEN Guo-liang, HE Xiang, WU Jia-ming, ZHANG Rong-tang, YIN Da-wei, YUAN Kun-bin, WU Zhe, . Key technologies of building information model integration and simulation in geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(S2): 443-453.
[9] DONG Fu-rui, WANG Shu-hong, HOU Qin-kuan. Multi-parameter dominant grouping method of rock mass discontinuity based on principal component analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(9): 2457-2470.
[10] ZHANG Wen-gang, GU Xin, LIU Han-long, ZHANG Qing, WANG Lin, WANG Lu-qi, . Probabilistic back analysis of soil parameters and displacement prediction of unsaturated slopes using Bayesian updating [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1112-1122.
[11] JIA Bao-xin, LI Feng, PAN Yi-shan, ZHOU Lin-li, . Microseismic source locating method based on variable step size accelerated search [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 843-856.
[12] WU Xun, SHI Jian-yong, ZHANG Tao, SHU Shi, LI Yu-pin, LEI Hao, . Inverse estimation of parameters for heat generation due to degradation in landfills based on the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(2): 511-518.
[13] DONG Wei, WANG Xue-bin, . A reliable-subset DIC method for deformation measurements in similarity simulation experiments of geotechnical engineering [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(9): 2525-2534.
[14] CHEN Zhou-quan, CHEN Xiang-sheng, PANG Xiao-chao, . An implicit integration algorithm for implementing the critical-state sand model into the finite element analysis [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2279-2286.
[15] SONG Yi-min, LING Xiao-kang, ZHANG Jing-zong, ZHU Chen-li, REN He, YUAN De-shun. Inversion of mechanical parameters of geomaterials based on DSCM-FEM [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(10): 2855-2864.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] WAN Zhi, DONG Hui, LIU Bao-chen. On choice of hyper-parameters of support vector machines for time series regression and prediction with orthogonal design[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[2] WANG Guang-jin,YANG Chun-he ,ZHANG Chao,MA Hong-ling,KONG Xiang-yun ,HO. Research on particle size grading and slope stability analysis of super-high dumping site[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[3] QI Ji-lin, ZHANG Jian-ming, YAO Xiao-liang, HU Wei, FANG Li-li. Analysis of settlements of constructions in permafrost regions[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 1 -8 .
[4] LIU Jin-long , CHEN Lu-wang , WANG Ji-li. Characteristic analysis of temperature stresses of shaft wall[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2386 -2390 .
[5] YU Li-yuan , CHEN Xiao-peng , HAN Li-jun , WANG Ying-chao . Elastic analysis of surrounding rock for underwater tunnels based on functions of complex variables method[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 345 -351 .
[6] WANG Wei-dong, WANG Hao-ran, XU Zhong-hua. Study of parameters of HS-Small model used in numerical analysis of excavations in Shanghai area[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1766 -1774 .
[7] CHU Wei-jiang, SU Jing-bo, XU Wei-ya. An elasto-viscoplastic model for Drucker-Prager material based on consistency theory[J]. , 2008, 29(3): 811 -816 .
[8] BAI Jun-guang , Lü Sheng-di , HAN Jian-she . Stability prediction of reservoir landslide of Lijiaxia Hydropower station before and after reservoir impounding[J]. , 2008, 29(7): 1723 -1731 .
[9] XIE Hong-yang , WANG Yuan-han,. Dynamic analysis of elastic plate resting on two-parameter foundation[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 753 -758 .
[10] YANG Xun ,WANG Huan-huan ,YU Ke-qin ,JIN Xian-long , . Seismic dynamic response analysis of breakwater under traveling wave excitations[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1775 -1781 .