岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 67-80.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0120CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0120

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同锚固孔径下2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性试验研究

陶志刚1, 2, 3,李梦楠1, 2,于海军1, 2,范方政4,王炯1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学(北京) 隧道工程灾变防控与智能建养全国重点实验室,北京 100083;2. 中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与土木工程学院,北京 100083;3. 华北理工大学,矿业工程学院,河北 唐山 063210;4. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-18 接受日期:2024-06-02 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-07-30
  • 通讯作者: 于海军,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事边坡及地下工程岩土力学相关的研究工作。E-mail: yuhaijun2023@163.com
  • 作者简介:陶志刚,男,1981年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩体力学与工程灾害控制理论研究和教学工作。E-mail: taozhigang1981@163.com

Experimental study on the anchoring characteristics of 2G-NPR anchor rods under different anchoring apertures

TAO Zhi-gang1, 2, 3, LI Meng-nan1, 2, YU Hai-jun1, 2, FAN Fang-zheng4, WANG Jiong1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 3. North China University of Science and Technology, College of Mining Engineering, Tangshan, Hebei 063210, China; 4. School of Resources and Security Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
  • Received:2024-01-18 Accepted:2024-06-02 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-07-30

摘要: 为了更好地分析2G-NPR锚杆锚固特性,确定合理的锚杆直径与锚固孔径的匹配范围。以室内拉拔试验为基础,分析了不同锚固孔径下锚固体系破坏形式;建立了锚固体与锚固孔径匹配的力学模型,推导了沿锚固方向轴向力和界面剪应力理论计算公式;通过有限差分程序FLAC3D建立不同锚固孔径下的拉拔模型,揭示了锚固系统的应力分布规律。结果表明:(1)在不同锚固孔径下,以直径匹配差值8 mm为界,锚固体系在达到最大承载能力时的破坏界面不同;(2)锚固体系在加载时荷载−位移曲线可分为预加载、弹性变形、塑性变形、界面开始脱黏、界面完全脱黏5个阶段;(3)拉拔力为30 kN条件下,随着锚固孔径增大,锚杆−锚固剂界面剪应力分布随孔径变化不大,但在螺旋状肋处有明显剪应力集中现象,相同位置锚杆−锚固剂界面剪应力是锚固剂−围岩界面剪应力的2~3倍,锚固剂−围岩界面剪应力分布随孔径增大而明显减小; (4)确定了直径为18 mm的2G-NPR锚杆最佳锚固孔径差值范围为8~12 mm。

关键词: 拉拔试验, 2G-NPR锚杆, 锚固孔径, 锚固性能, 锚固失效形式

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the anchoring characteristics of 2G-NPR anchor rods and determine the reasonable matching range between the anchor rod diameter and the anchoring aperture. Based on laboratory pull-out tests, the failure modes of the anchoring system under different anchoring apertures were analyzed. A mechanical model was established to match the anchor body and anchor aperture, and theoretical formulas for axial force and interface shear stress along the anchoring direction were derived. Using the finite difference program FLAC3D, pull-out models for different anchoring apertures were established, and the stress distribution of the anchoring system was analyzed. The results indicate that: 1) Under different anchoring apertures, with a diameter matching difference of 8 mm as the boundary, the failure interface of the anchoring system at maximum bearing capacity differs. 2) The load-displacement curve of the anchoring system during loading can be categorized into five stages: preloading, elastic deformation, plastic deformation, interface debonding initiation, and complete debonding. 3) Under a pulling force of 30 kN, as the anchoring aperture increases, the shear stress distribution at the anchor rod-anchoring agent interface shows little variation with hole diameter, but exhibits significant stress concentration at the spiral rib. At the same position, the shear stress at the anchor rod-anchoring agent interface is 2-3 times that at the anchoring agent-surrounding rock interface. Additionally, the shear stress distribution at the anchoring agent-surrounding rock interface decreases significantly with increasing hole diameter. 4) The optimal anchoring aperture difference for diameter of 18 mm 2G-NPR anchor rods has been determined to be 8-12 mm.

Key words: pullout test, 2G-NPR anchor blot, anchor aperture, anchor performance, anchorage body failure modes

中图分类号: TU470
[1] 黄曼, 宁昊晟, 洪陈杰, 陶志刚, 刘雨星, 张贺, . 基于第二代负泊松比锚杆加固的充填结构面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 131-140.
[2] 郭鹏飞, 王戌, 徐飞龙, 孙岩, 刘鑫. 软弱岩体锚杆物理锚固装置参数优化分析及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2961-2970.
[3] 杜炜, 聂如松, 李列列, 谭永长, 张杰, 祁延录, . 考虑不同边界条件的风积沙−土工格栅拉拔试验离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1849-1862.
[4] 黄炜, 简文彬, 杨坚, 豆红强, 罗金妹, . 多支盘锚杆的原型试验与荷载传递特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 520-530.
[5] 闫穆涵, 凌贤长, 唐亮, 肖宏, 宋绪国. 土工格栅−碎石界面力学特性拉拔试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2967-2978.
[6] 王家全, 祁航翔, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于数字图像分析的土工合成材料加筋砂土拉拔试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3259-3269.
[7] 冯忠居, 江冠, 赵瑞欣, 龙厚胜, 王政斌, 张正旭, . 基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2215-2224.
[8] 杨坚, 简文彬, 黄炜, 黄聪惠, 罗金妹, 李先忠, . 注浆支盘式锚杆拉拔试验及极限承载力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1126-1132.
[9] 陈成, 段永达, 芮瑞, 汪伦. 基于拉拔试验和离散元模拟的单、双层土工 格栅加固道砟的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 954-962.
[10] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[11] 崔凯, 黄井镜, 谌文武, 王东华, 韩宁, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址锚固浆液选型和性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[12] 高俊丽, 徐宏飞, 曹威, 袁川. 加肋土工膜与砂土拉拔试验及界面细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4668-4674.
[13] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[14] 赵象卓,张宏伟,CAO Chen,张 明,张怀东,韩 军, . 不同围岩条件下锚杆肋间距与锚固力优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1263-1270.
[15] 崔 凯,王东华,谌文武,任晓峰,刘 建,杨 光,. 基于改性糯米灰浆的3种锚杆锚固性能对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 498-506.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!