岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 573-581.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0488

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

综合管廊始发井能源支护桩热力响应现场试验

任连伟1,王书彪1,孔纲强2,杨权威1,邓岳保3   

  1. 1. 河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000;2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点试验室,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 宁波大学 滨海城市轨道交通协同创新中心,浙江 宁波 315211
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-22 接受日期:2024-07-19 出版日期:2025-02-10 发布日期:2025-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 王书彪,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事能量桩方面的研究。E-mail: 1210762344@qq.com
  • 作者简介:任连伟,男,1980年生,博士,教授,主要从事地基基础相关的教学与科研工作。E-mail: renhpu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51922037, No. U23A20600);宁波大学滨海城市轨道交通协同创新中心开放基金(No. XT2022001)。

Field tests on thermal response characteristics of energy support piles in starting well of utility tunnel

REN Lian-wei1, WANG Shu-biao1, KONG Gang-qiang2, YANG Quan-wei1, DENG Yue-bao3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Coastal Urban Rail Transit, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • Received:2024-04-22 Accepted:2024-07-19 Online:2025-02-10 Published:2025-02-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51922037, U23A20600) and the Open Fund Project of Collaborative Innovation Center of Coastal Urban Rail Transit, Ningbo University (XT2022001).

摘要: 将能源桩技术应用到支护桩形成能源支护桩,不仅可以解决能源桩技术的结构安全问题,还能使资源回收再利用。依托焦作市新河商务区高压线路归并改造综合管廊基坑支护工程,开展基坑开挖前后能源支护桩的热响应试验,并在基坑开挖稳定后进行不同间歇比下能源支护桩的热力响应现场试验,实测进水口、出水口、桩身温度以及应变变化数据,初步探讨了能源支护桩的换热性能、热致应力及桩身弯矩的变化规律。研究结果表明:此试验条件下,基坑的开挖使能源支护桩的换热量得到提升,而桩身附加温度应力减小。不同间歇比下能源支护桩的换热量随着间歇比减小而得到提升,桩身附加温度应力随着循环次数的增加而逐渐增大,且沿埋深逐渐减小。基坑开挖引起桩身弯矩在−8.0 m处最大为128.98 kN·m,且越往两端弯矩越小,随着桩身温度逐渐上升,桩身弯矩先减小后上升;不同间歇比下能源支护桩桩身弯矩随着间歇比的增大而逐渐增大,间歇比为2.0时桩身−4.0 m处产生的弯矩最大为7.12 kN·m。

关键词: 能源支护桩, 基坑开挖, 间歇比, 换热性能, 热力响应

Abstract: Applying energy pile technology to support piles not only addresses structural safety issues, but also facilitates resource recovery and reuse. Based on the foundation pit support project of high-voltage line merging and reconstruction of a utility tunnel in Xinhe Business District of Jiaozuo City, thermal response tests of energy support piles were conducted before and after foundation pit excavation. Additionally, thermal response field tests of energy support piles under different interval ratios were performed once the excavation stabilized. The inlet/outlet water temperature, pile temperature, and strain change data were measured. Preliminary discussions covered heat transfer performance, thermal stress, and pile bending moments of energy support piles. Results indicate that under these test conditions, pit excavation enhances the heat transfer capacity of the energy support piles, while reducing additional temperature stress on the pile body. For energy support piles with different interval ratios, the heat transfer capacity improves as the interval ratio decreases. Additional temperature stress on the pile body increases with more cycles and decreases with depth. The bending moment of pile body caused by pit excavation is 128.98 kN·m at −8.0 m, decreasing towards both ends. As pile temperature increases, the bending moment initially decreases and then rises. For energy support piles with different interval ratios, the bending moment of pile body increases with the increase of interval ratio, reaching a maximum of 7.12 kN·m at −4.0 m when the interval ratio is 2.0.

Key words: energy support pile, pit excavation, interval ratio, heat transfer performance, thermal response

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 常洪林, 孔纲强, 王福慧, 王成龙, 周杨, . 褥垫层作用下预应力高强混凝土能量桩热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1240-1251.
[2] 黄明华, 钟煜轩, 陆锦斌, 王克平. 基于非连续地基梁模型的基坑开挖诱发下卧盾构隧道变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 492-504.
[3] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
[4] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
[5] 王锐松, 郭成超, 林沛元, 王复明, . 富水粉土基坑装配式可回收支护开挖响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 843-853.
[6] 应宏伟, 熊一帆, 沈华伟, 魏锋, 李冰河, 吕唯, . 考虑圆孔不均匀收敛和空间效应的基坑坑外土体水平位移场分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3565-3576.
[7] 管凌霄, 徐长节, 王雪鹏, 夏雪勤, 可文海, . 基坑开挖及降水引起下卧隧道变形的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3241-3251.
[8] 白时雨, 王文军, 谢新宇, 朱德良, . 考虑扰动影响的土体小应变硬化模型参数试验研究及其在基坑工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 206-216.
[9] 汤炀, 刘干斌, 郑明飞, 史世雍, . 饱和粉土中相变能源桩热力响应模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 282-290.
[10] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 刘建文, 彭铸, . 邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖对下卧 盾构隧道影响的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2176-2190.
[11] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[12] 鲁泰山, 刘松玉, 蔡国军, 吴恺, 夏文俊, . 软土地层基坑开挖扰动及土体再压缩变形研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 565-573.
[13] 季伟伟, 孔纲强, 刘汉龙, 杨庆, . 软塑黄土地区隧道仰拱热力响应特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 558-564.
[14] 任连伟, 任军洋, 孔纲强, 刘汉龙, . 冷热循环下PHC能量桩热力响应 和承载性能现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 529-536.
[15] 魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!