岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 943-954.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0657

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩石顶管穿越深大断层破碎带摩阻力 计算方法研究

钟祖良1, 2,杜传烨1,刘新荣1, 2,李超1, 3   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045; 3. 贵州大学 土木工程学院,贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-28 接受日期:2024-09-14 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 作者简介:钟祖良,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事隧道与地下工程智能建造、岩土工程减灾防灾等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: haiou983@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金面上项目(No.CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0887);国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(No.52208391)。

Method for calculating frictional resistance of pipe jacking in rock strata crossing deep and large fault fracture zones

ZHONG Zu-liang1, 2, DU Chuan-ye1, LIU Xin-rong1, 2, LI Chao1, 3   

  1. 1 School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2 Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2024-05-28 Accepted:2024-09-14 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2022NSCQ-MSX0887) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52208391).

摘要: 根据国务院办公厅关于加强饮用水安全保障工作的通知要求,西南山地大城市为实现备用水库−供水组团和供水组团间互联互通时需建设大量的输水隧洞。由于顶管法具有优越的技术和环保优势,在输水隧洞建设时得到广泛的应用。针对岩石顶管穿越断层破碎带时摩阻力计算方法缺乏的问题,依托国务院确定的172项节水供水重大水利工程—重庆观景口水利枢纽工程,通过穿越深大断层破碎带段现场顶力监测与管节周边沉渣调查,揭示了断层破碎带加固前后管节间隙中沉渣填充范围,提出了2种管节−围岩接触力学模型,并基于筒仓理论、围岩弹塑性理论以及多层圆筒模型,推导了2种力学模型对应的顶管摩阻力计算方法。通过现场摩阻力监测与理论计算值对比,验证了岩石顶管穿越断层破碎带摩阻力计算方法的适用性。

关键词: 顶管, 断层破碎带, 筒仓理论, 摩阻力, 计算方法

Abstract: According to the notice issued by the General Office of the State Council on enhancing drinking water safety guarantees, large mountainous cities in southwestern China need to construct numerous water conveyance tunnels to achieve interconnection between backup reservoirs-water supply clusters and water supply clusters. Due to its superior technological and environmental advantages, pipe jacking has been widely used in the construction of these tunnels. In response to the lack of a calculation method for frictional resistance when pipe jacking traverses fault zones with fractured rock, this research relies on the Guanjingkou water control project in Chongqing, one of the 172 major water conservancy projects for water-saving and water supply determined by the State Council. Through on-site monitoring of jacking forces and investigation of sediment accumulation around the pipe sections in deep and extensive fault zones with fractured rock, the extent of sediment filling in the over-excavated gap before and after reinforcement of the fault zones is revealed. Two mechanical models for the contact between the pipe and the surrounding rock are proposed, and based on Janssen’s theory, the elastic-plastic theory of rock, and the multi-layer cylinder model, corresponding calculation methods for the frictional resistance of pipe jacking are derived for the two mechanical models. The applicability of these friction calculation methods for pipe jacking traversing fault zones with fractured rock is verified by comparing on-site friction monitoring data with theoretical calculation values.

Key words: pipe jacking, fault fracture zone, Janssen’s theory, frictional resistance, calculating method

中图分类号: TU456
[1] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[2] 王长虹, 蔡德雍, 胡子轩, 杨天笑. 扰动状态下束浆挤扩桩抗拔机制与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2980-2994.
[3] 陈志波, 陈峰, 翁洋, 曹光伟, 曾旭明, 潘生贵, 杨辉, . 考虑土塞效应的大直径钢管桩竖向承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2224-2236.
[4] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[5] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[6] 王长虹, 杨天笑, 马铖涛, 沈洋. 束浆挤扩钢管桩竖向抗拔承载力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 846-856.
[7] 陈慧芸, 冯忠居, 白少奋, 董建松, 夏承明, 蔡杰, . 桥梁桩基穿越溶洞的荷载传递机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1405-1415.
[8] 刘润, 尹瑞龙, 梁超, 陈广思. 黏土中超大直径钢管桩内侧摩阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 232-240.
[9] 张驰, 赖俊荣, 阮芳伟, 徐永华, 王勇, 刘观仕, 徐国方, . 海洋钢管桩发生溜桩的地层条件及 桩侧动摩阻力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 355-360.
[10] 崔光耀, 麻建飞, 宁茂权, 唐再兴, 刘顺水, 田宇航, . 超大矩形顶管盾构隧道近接下穿高铁施工 加固方案对比分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 414-424.
[11] 高磊, 韩川, 黄坚, 王洋, 周乐, . 基于BOTDR的能源桩现场试验与承载特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 117-126.
[12] 张志伟, 李忠超, 梁荣柱, 于东东, 梁东睿, 王理想, 吴文兵. 软土地层矩形顶管掘进引起地表隆沉变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 419-430.
[13] 柴源, 牛勇, 吕海波, . 水泥胶结钙质砂地层中单桩竖向承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2203-2212.
[14] 唐正, 王洪新, 孙德安, 张骁, . 大断面管幕法隧道群管顶进的地表位移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1933-1941.
[15] 刘维正, 戴晓亚, 孙康, 艾国平, 雷涛. 地铁盾构隧道近距离上穿既有线路 纵向变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 831-842.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!