径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0670

岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 905-915.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0670

径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究

郭焕明¹，张虎^{2, 3}，丑亚玲¹，郑波⁴，胡金涛²，韩善博¹

1. 兰州理工大学土木工程学院，甘肃兰州 730050；2. 东北林业大学土木与交通学院，黑龙江哈尔滨 150040； 3. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院冻土工程国家重点实验室，甘肃兰州 730000；4. 中铁西南科学研究院有限公司，四川成都 611731

收稿日期:2024-05-30 接受日期:2024-08-29 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
通讯作者: 张虎，男，1986年生，博士，教授，主要从事寒区工程与环境、软土与冻土地基处理、数值模拟及计算等教学和研究。E-mail: zhanghu@nefu.edu.cn
作者简介:郭焕明，男，2001年生，硕士研究生，主要从事软土与冻土地基处理、数值模拟及计算等研究。E-mail: 2199827118@qq.com
基金资助:
黑龙江省优秀青年基金（No.YQ2022D001）；国家自然基金（No.41971085）；四川省科技计划（No.2024NSFSC0158）

Hydro-thermal-mechanical experiment of soft clay during radial freeze-thaw process

GUO Huan-ming¹, ZHANG Hu^{2, 3}, CHOU Ya-ling¹, ZHENG Bo⁴, HU Jin-tao², HAN Shan-bo¹

1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150040, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 4. Southwest Research Institute of China Railway, Chengdu, Sichuan 611731, China

Received:2024-05-30 Accepted:2024-08-29 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Outstanding Youth Fund of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2022D001) the National Natural Science Foundation (41971085) and Sichuan Science and Technology Project (2024NSFSC0158).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究径向冻融条件下软黏土水热力过程，开展了不同温度下软黏土冻融试验，对比分析了各冻融过程中土样温度、含水率、土压力、排水量和耗电量的变化规律。试验结果表明：冻融过程中土样实际温度下降速率均与冻结锋面的移动速率呈正相关关系，温度的传递效率主要与传热距离、传热介质和能量损失率有关；在土样冻结过程中，水分的迁移与冷端对水分的吸力作用和冻胀过程中冻胀对水分的相对作用密切相关；冻结过程中产生的环向和径向冷生构造会加速软黏土中水分的排出，冻胀力会对未冻区土体产生固结作用；通过对试验过程中冻结范围、排水量和耗电量的对比，发现试验温度为−15 ℃时在冻结过程中产生的融沉圈直径最大，此时的能耗比也最大，因此，将−15 ℃作为本系列试验的最佳冻结温度。

关键词: 软土地基, 人工冻结, 水热力过程, 最佳温度

Abstract: In order to investigate the hydro-thermal-mechanical process of soft clay under radial freeze-thaw conditions, freeze-thaw tests of soft clay at different temperatures were carried out, and the changes in temperature, water content, soil pressure, water discharge, and power consumption of soil samples were analyzed and compared. The results show that the actual temperature drop rate is positively correlated with the moving rate of the frozen front, and the temperature transfer efficiency is mainly related to the heat transfer distance, heat transfer medium, and energy loss rate. During the freezing of soil samples, the migration of water is closely related to the suction effect of the cold end on water and the relative effect of frost heave on water. The circumferential and radial cryogenic structures produced during the freezing process will accelerate the discharge of water from the soft clay, and the frost heave force will produce a consolidation effect on the soil in the unfrozen area. By comparing the freezing range, water discharge, and power consumption during the test process, it is found that the diameter of the thawing circle generated during the freezing process is the largest when the test temperature is −15 ℃, and the energy consumption ratio is also at its highest at this point. Therefore, −15 ℃ is taken as the optimal freezing temperature for this series of tests.

Key words: soft foundation, artificial freezing, hydro-thermal-mechanical process, optimal temperature

中图分类号: TU441

郭焕明, 张虎, 丑亚玲, 郑波, 胡金涛, 韩善博, . 径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 905-915.

GUO Huan-ming, ZHANG Hu, CHOU Ya-ling, ZHENG Bo, HU Jin-tao, HAN Shan-bo, . Hydro-thermal-mechanical experiment of soft clay during radial freeze-thaw process[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(3): 905-915.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[2]	王长虹, 魏永青, 张海东, 李飞. 地铁车站下水平冻结过程中冻胀的热−水−力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2775-2785.
[3]	崔金虎, 王路君, 叶智刚, 燕秉法, 黄家晟, 朱斌, . 循环温度荷载下高温管道-软土地基相互作用模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3286-3294.
[4]	应宏伟, 闫旭政, 周建, 龚晓南, 王阳扬, 韩华超, 侯靖. 堤坝软土碎石桩复合地基计算参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 669-677.
[5]	胡静, 唐跃, 张家康, 邓涛. 高速列车荷载作用下饱和软土地基动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3169-3181.
[6]	吴建涛, 叶霄, 李国维, 蒋超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[7]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[8]	汪益敏，闫岑，于恒，李奇. 静载作用下土工格栅加筋拓宽路堤土中应力特征试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 311-317.
[9]	肖忠，王琰，王元战，刘莺, . 桶间距对四桶吸力式基础各单向承载力的影响及最优间距的确定[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3603-3611.
[10]	李洪江，童立元，刘松玉，顾明芬，陆湛秋,. 软土地基刚柔性桩水平承载位移控制标准研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2676-2682.
[11]	石荣剑，陈斌，岳丰田，张勇，陆路，. 盾构地中对接冻结加固模型试验（Ⅱ）—— 冻结过程中地层的冻胀效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2639-2646.
[12]	焉振，王元战，. 考虑软基不排水强度循环弱化的格型钢板桩防波堤动力有限元分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1454-1462.
[13]	石荣剑，岳丰田，张勇，陆路, . 盾构地中对接冻结加固模型试验（Ⅰ） ——冻结过程中地层冻结温度场的分布特征[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 368-376.
[14]	曾超峰，薛秀丽，郑刚，. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[15]	肖忠，葛博睿，王元战，王琰, . 十字形内隔板对桶形基础各单向承载力和破坏模式的影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3136-3144.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究

Hydro-thermal-mechanical experiment of soft clay during radial freeze-thaw process

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0