岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 811-820.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0702

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环作用下地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化及微观机制研究

薛钦培1,陈宏信1, 2,冯世进1, 3,刘晓轩4,谢伟5   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 同济大学 土木工程防灾减灾全国重点实验室,上海 200092;4. 宝武集团环境资源科技有限公司,上海 201999; 5. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司,浙江 杭州 311122
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-06 接受日期:2024-08-26 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 作者简介:薛钦培,男,1995年生,博士研究生,主要从事环境岩土方面研究工作。E-mail: 2111340@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2023YFC3707904);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42077250,No.42277148)。

Evolution of permeability characteristics and micro-mechanism of geopolymer cutoff wall materials under dry-wet cycling

XUE Qin-pei1, CHEN Hong-xin1, 2, FENG Shi-jin1, 3, LIU Xiao-xuan4, XIE Wei5   

  1. (1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 4. Baowu Group Environmental Resources Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201999, China; 5. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311122, China
  • Received:2024-06-06 Accepted:2024-08-26 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC3707904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077250, 42277148).

摘要: 竖向隔离墙是限制污染物迁移最有效的技术之一,已被广泛用于污染土壤和地下水的现场管控。在干湿循环作用下,传统隔离墙材料极易发生性能劣化,导致其服役寿命显著缩短。通过一系列宏微观试验,研究了干湿循环作用下钠基膨润土、氧化镁、微胶囊3种改性材料对粉煤灰基地聚物隔离墙材料渗透特性演化和微观结构的影响。研究表明:不同地聚物隔离墙材料养护28 d后无侧限抗压强度和渗透系数均满足水泥基隔离墙的防渗设计要求,分别可以达到6.62 MPa和4.73×10−11 m/s;不含改性材料的试样在1次干湿循环后渗透系数超过1×10−8 m/s,而含有改性材料的渗透系数在5次循环后仍能达到设计要求;3种改性材料通过影响小孔(<0.05 μm)、中孔[0.05 μm,0.10 μm]和大孔(>0.10 μm)所占的比例,可以有效提高地聚物隔离墙材料在干湿循环条件下的防渗性能。研究成果对隔离墙的服役性能评价和科学设计都有重要意义。

关键词: 隔离墙, 干湿循环, 地聚物, 渗透特性, 微观机制

Abstract: Vertical cutoff wall is one of the most effective technologies to restrict the migration of contaminants and has been widely used for in-situ management and control of contaminated soil and groundwater. The traditional cutoff wall materials are highly susceptible to performance degradation under dry-wet cycles, leading to a significant reduction in service life. Through a series of macroscopic and microscopic experiments, the influences of sodium bentonite, magnesium oxide, and microcapsules on the evolution of permeability characteristics and microstructure of fly ash-based geopolymer cutoff wall materials under dry-wet cycles were investigated. The results showed that the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) and permeability coefficient of different geopolymer cutoff wall materials all met the anti-seepage design requirements for cement-based cutoff walls, achieving 6.62 MPa and 4.73×10−11 m/s, respectively, after being cured for 28 days. The permeability coefficient of samples without modified materials exceeded 1×10−8 m/s after the first dry-wet cycle, while that of samples with modified materials could still meet the design requirements after five cycles. The three modified materials can effectively influence the proportions of micropores (<0.05 μm), mesopores [0.05 μm, 0.10 μm], and macropores (>0.10 μm), thereby improving the anti-seepage performance of geopolymer cutoff wall materials under dry-wet cycles. This study has significant implications for the performance evaluation and scientific design of cutoff walls.

Key words: cutoff wall, dry-wet cycle, geopolymer, permeability, micro-mechanism

中图分类号: TU443
[1] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[2] 吴子龙, 俞韬, 闫超, 邓永锋, 胡广青, 高宇航, 王璋, 王力, . 陕西黄土重金属污染分析与黄土/膨润土隔离墙处治初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2738-2748.
[3] 刘文林, 鄂天龙, 冯杨州, 牛松荧, 张子堂, 孙熠, 陈宏信, . 纳米改性地聚合物隔离墙材料基本工程特性及冻融循环耐久性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2039-2048.
[4] 祁凯, 万志辉, 戴国亮, 胡涛, 周峰, 张鹏, . 基于不同注浆材料固化钙质砂的力学性能试验及微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1825-1838.
[5] 孟佳佳, 吴益平, 晏鄂川, 汪洋. 基于荷载-干湿循环耦合试验的三峡库区石龙门滑坡滑带土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1511-1520.
[6] 唐先习, 张徐军, 李昊杰, . 钢渣-煤矸石地聚合物固化黄土的力学特性评价与固化原理分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1205-1214.
[7] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[8] 王桂林, 王力, 王润秋, 任甲山, . 干湿循环后贯通型锯齿状红砂岩节理面剪切本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 706-720.
[9] 吕志涛, 朱小宝, 罗嗣成, 夏才初, 曾祥太, . 砂岩多周期累积冻融变形特性及其微观机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 389-401.
[10] 刘畅, 代丽媛, 李彪, 童富果, 田斌, 周铨. 干湿循环作用下宽饱和度范围红壤土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3811-3822.
[11] 王杰, 李冲, 刘磊, 丁阔, . 干湿循环下泥岩变形特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3132-3142.
[12] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[13] 王辉, 钮新强, 马刚, 周伟, . 干湿循环作用下堆石料宏细观力学特性的离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 665-676.
[14] 江文豪, 冯晨, 黄啸, 李江山, . 缓冲层−复合隔离墙−含水层系统中有机污染物二维运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 731-741.
[15] 程家林, 张贵科, 邓韶辉, 黄习文, 周伟, 马刚, . 干湿循环对不同粒径堆石颗粒破碎强度的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 95-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!