岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 1967-1976.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0828CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0828

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    

温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究

蔡田明1, 2,李顺群1, 2,程学磊3,周燕1,李有兵4, 井乐炜4,方心畅4,王英红5   

  1. 1. 天津城建大学 土木工程学院,天津 300384;2. 天津城建大学 天津市软土特性与工程环境重点实验室,天津 300384; 3. 中原工学院 智能建造与建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007;4. 中国电建市政建设集团有限公司,天津 300384; 5. 天津城建大学 控制与机械工程学院,天津 300384
  • 收稿日期:2024-07-03 接受日期:2024-12-18 出版日期:2025-06-11 发布日期:2025-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 李顺群,男,1971年生,博士,博士后,教授,主要从事土力学和基础工程领域的教学和研究工作。E-mail: lishunqun@sina.com
  • 作者简介:蔡田明,男,1999年生,硕士研究生,主要从事三维应力测试和冻土冻胀方面的研究。E-mail: xcaitianming@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52478354);甘肃省重点研发计划(No.23YFGA0038);天津市研究生科研创新项目(No.2022SKYZ329)。

Analysis and application of temperature effects on earth pressure cell test data

CAI Tian-ming1, 2, LI Shun-qun1, 2, CHENG Xue-lei3, ZHOU Yan1, LI You-bing4, JING Le-wei4, FANG Xin-chang4, WANG Ying-hong5   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; 2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Soft Soil Characteristics and Engineering Environment, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China; 3. School of Intelligent Construction and Civil Engineering, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 4. China Power Construction Municipal Construction Group Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300384, China; 5. School of Control and Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China
  • Received:2024-07-03 Accepted:2024-12-18 Online:2025-06-11 Published:2025-06-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52478354), the Gansu Provincial Key R&D Program Projects (23YFGA0038) and the Tianjin Graduate Student Research and Innovation Project Funding (2022SKYZ329).

摘要: 与其他传感器一样,环境温度改变会显著影响土压力盒测试数据的准确性,而现有测试方法较少考虑温度改变对电阻应变式土压力盒测试读数的影响。为提高测试读数的可靠性,对电阻应变式土压力盒开展了温度效应研究。将标定系数分别为0~100、100~200、200~300 kN/mV的土压力盒悬空于温控试验箱中,以吉林省气温变化范围为基准,系统研究了−30~40 ℃循环变化条件下土压力盒读数的变化规律,提出了电阻应变式土压力盒测试读数温度修正方法。在此基础上,给出了三维土压力盒测试读数误差修正方法,并对比分析了路基冻胀模型试验温度修正前后三维应力数值差别,进一步提高了测试数据的精确度。结果表明,当环境温度降低时,土压力盒测试读数近似呈线性增长;当环境温度升高时,测试读数呈非线性降低。此外,应力−温度曲线的滞回圈基本不随温度循环次数增加而改变,但不同土压力盒的变化规律存在个体差异。温度修正宜针对降温和升温过程分别建立相应的增量公式并形成分段函数。该方法同样适用于三维应力测试,且温度变化引起的正应力测试误差大于剪应力。该研究有助于提高土压力盒测试精度,为准确揭示温度变化条件下的应力演化规律提供了条件。

关键词: 土压力盒, 温度循环, 曲线拟合, 温度修正, 误差分析

Abstract: Like other sensors, ambient temperature changes significantly affect the accuracy of earth pressure cell test data. However, current test methods seldom consider the impact of temperature changes on resistance strain-type earth pressure cell readings. A study was conducted to enhance the reliability of test readings by examining temperature effects on resistance strain-type earth pressure cells. Earth pressure cells with calibration coefficients of 0−100 kN/mV, 100−200 kN/mV, and 200−300 kN/mV were placed in a temperature-controlled chamber. Using the temperature range of Jilin Province as a baseline, the study systematically examined the variations in earth pressure cell readings from −30 ℃ to 40 ℃ and proposed a temperature correction method for the readings of resistance strain-type earth pressure cells. A three-dimensional error correction method for earth pressure cell test readings was developed. The study compared three-dimensional stress values before and after temperature correction in a subgrade frost heave model test, enhancing data accuracy. The results indicate that as the ambient temperature decreases, the earth pressure cell readings increase approximately linearly; as the temperature rises, the readings decrease nonlinearly. Additionally, the hysteresis loop of the stress-temperature curve remains largely unchanged with repeated temperature cycles, though individual earth pressure cells show distinct patterns. Temperature corrections should use incremental formulas for cooling and heating processes, forming a piecewise function. This method is also applicable to three-dimensional stress testing, where temperature-induced errors in normal stress exceed those in shear stress. This study enhances the accuracy of earth pressure cell measurements and provides conditions for accurately revealing stress evolution under variable temperatures.

Key words: earth pressure cell, temperature cycling, curve fitting, temperature correction, error analysis

中图分类号: TU432
[1] 陈伟志, 张莎莎, 李安洪, . 温度循环下压实粗粒盐渍土水盐迁移与变形响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 74-84.
[2] 丁林楠, 李国英, 魏匡民, . 描述土体级配分布的级配方程及其适用性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 173-183.
[3] 杨磊, 涂冬媚, 朱启银, 吴则祥, 余闯, . 考虑变温幅值影响的颗粒循环热 固结离散元法试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 591-600.
[4] 史永跃, 王奎华, 董天文, 马显春, 黄永威. 真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
[5] 郭君仪, 孙梦雅, 施斌, 魏广庆, 刘洁. 不同环境温度下土体含水率主动加热 光纤法监测试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4137-4144.
[6] 梁 波, 厉彦君, 凌学鹏, 赵宁雨, 张青松, . 离心模型试验中微型土压力盒土压力测定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 818-826.
[7] 费 康, 戴 迪, 洪 伟, . 能量桩单桩工作特性简化分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 70-80.
[8] 闫振雄,郭奇峰,王培涛, . 空心包体应变计地应力分量计算方法及应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 715-721.
[9] 李顺群,夏锦红,王杏杏,. 一种三维土压力盒的工作原理及其应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 337-342.
[10] 王成龙,刘汉龙,孔纲强,吴 迪, . 工作荷载下温度循环对桩基变形与应力的影响分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 317-322.
[11] 吴顺川 ,黄小庆,陈 钒,柴金飞,吴昊燕, . 岩体破裂矩张量反演方法及其应用[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 1-18.
[12] 顾乐民. 最小一乘法在岩土地基沉降中的应用[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2366-2372.
[13] 高 帅,魏 宁,李小春. 盖岩CO2突破压测试方法综述[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2716-2727.
[14] 蔡 灿 ,伍开松 ,袁晓红 ,程少杰,. 中低应变率下的岩石损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 795-802.
[15] 谭晓慧,辛志宇,沈梦芬,汪贤恩,徐 全. 湿胀条件下合肥膨胀土土-水特征研究[J]. , 2014, 35(12): 3352-3360.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!