岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 3007-3017.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0967CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0967

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

缓冲材料气体突破试验与模型研究进展

叶为民1, 2,卢普怀1,崔林勇1,王琼1,陈永贵1   

  1. 1.同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2.同济大学 教育部城市环境与可持续发展联合研究中心,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-05 接受日期:2025-06-05 出版日期:2025-10-11 发布日期:2025-10-10
  • 作者简介:叶为民,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境地质、非饱和土力学等方面的研究与教学工作。E-mail: ye_tju@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42030714)

Advances on testing and modeling of gas breakthrough behavior of buffer materials

YE Wei-min1, 2, LU Pu-huai1, CUI Lin-yong1, WANG Qiong1, CHEN Yong-gui1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. United Research Center for Urban Environment and Sustainable Development of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2024-08-05 Accepted:2025-06-05 Online:2025-10-11 Published:2025-10-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42030714).

摘要: 开展耦合条件下、超低渗缓冲材料中气体迁移行为研究,对于确保深地质处置库安全运营具有极其重要的理论与实践意义。研究表明,气体在缓冲材料中的迁移一般会依次经历超低渗和气体突破两个阶段,分别以气体溶解扩散和显著渗流为特征。其中,突破模式主要包括毛细突破、力学突破和界面突破。为实现气体全过程迁移流量的连续测取与突破模式的甄别,试验装置的研发经历了恒体积、K0侧限、等向应力和三轴应力控制阶段。新近的温控三轴试验系统可实现1/10 000 mL/min超低流量量测,同时借助涡电流传感技术,可实现试样局部微体变的实时感知,助力突破模式甄别。鉴于经验模型和基于拟连续介质理论建立的理论模型缺少突破模式表征指标,学者们基于突破压力曲线优先触碰原则,建立了气体突破模式甄别概念模型。周期短且量测精度高的气体突破测试方法、更为普适的突破模式甄别模型构建以及不同尺度气体迁移参数转换等应该是未来研究重点。

关键词: 缓冲材料, 气体突破模式, 气体迁移试验装置, 多场耦合, 突破模式甄别

Abstract: Conducting research on gas migration processes in buffer materials under multi-physics coupling conditions holds both theoretical and practical significance for ensuring the safety of deep geological repositories. Studies reveal that gas migration in buffer materials sequentially undergoes ultra-low permeability and gas breakthrough stages, characterized by gas dissolution-diffusion and significant gas seepage, respectively. The breakthrough mechanisms are categorized into capillary, mechanical, and interfacial breakthrough. To achieve continuous measurement of gas flux throughout the process and identification of breakthrough patterns, experimental setups have evolved through constant-volume, K0 confined, isotropic stress-controlled, and triaxial stress-controlled configurations. The newly developed triaxial testing system enables ultra-low flow rate measurement at 1/10 000 mL/min while incorporating eddy current sensing technology for real-time monitoring of localized volumetric changes in specimens, thereby facilitating breakthrough mode identification. Given the absence of characterization indices in empirical models and quasi-continuum theory-based theoretical models, researchers have established a conceptual model to identify gas breakthrough patterns based on the principle of preferential touching of breakthrough pressure curves. Future research should prioritize gas breakthrough testing methods with short testing cycle and high measurement accuracy, development of generalized breakthrough pattern identification models, and parameter scaling across different scales.

Key words: buffer materials, gas breakthrough pattern, gas migration experimental system, multi-field coupling, identification of breakthrough pattern

中图分类号: TU 43
[1] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[2] 豆红强, 谢森华, 简文彬, 王浩, 郭朝旭, . 球状风化花岗岩类土质边坡土-岩界面优势流潜蚀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 950-960.
[3] 张虎元, 王赵明, 朱江鸿, 周光平, . 混合型缓冲材料砌块渗透性及其各向异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 573-581.
[4] 魏天宇, 王旭宏, 吕涛, 胡大伟, 周辉, 洪雯. 湿化膨胀与掺砂率对混合型缓冲材料 THM耦合过程的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 549-562.
[5] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆. 考虑开挖损伤的高放废物地质处置库温度-渗流-应力耦合数值模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1056-1064.
[6] 侯会明, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 张帆, . 考虑细观等效热学参数的高放废物处置库围岩应力−渗流−温度耦合模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3625-3634.
[7] 张小玲, 夏飞, 杜修力, 许成顺, . 考虑含水合物沉积物损伤的多场耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4229-4239.
[8] 许 韬,白 冰. 考虑物理性质参数变化的膨润土缓冲材料水-热耦合SPH数值解[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3853-3862.
[9] 苏国韶,秦子华,彭立锋,邹亚峰,胡小川, . 基于热-水-力-损伤耦合数值模型的高地温水工高压隧洞围岩承载特性[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 308-319.
[10] 李小春 ,袁 维,白 冰,. CO2地质封存力学问题的数值模拟方法综述[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1762-1772.
[11] 黄 滚 ,张 鑫 ,尹光志 ,郭 虎 ,熊洋涛 , . 煤瓦斯多场耦合显微观测试验装置的研制与应用[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 715-721.
[12] 刘泉声,刘学伟. 多场耦合作用下岩体裂隙扩展演化关键问题研究[J]. , 2014, 299(2): 305-321.
[13] 刘月妙,王 驹,曹胜飞,马利科 ,谢敬礼,赵星光,陈 亮. 中国高放废物地质处置缓冲材料大型试验台架和热-水-力-化学耦合性能研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2756-2762.
[14] 王柳江 ,刘斯宏 ,汪俊波 ,朱 豪 . 电场-渗流场-应力场耦合的电渗固结数值分析[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1904-1911.
[15] 赵成刚,韦昌富,蔡国庆. 土力学理论的发展和面临的挑战[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3521-3540.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!