岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (S1): 285-296.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0998CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.0998

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

红层软岩崩解面释放率与崩解特性研究

喻昭晟1,陈晓斌1, 2,周雨晴1,吕鑫龙1   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083;2. 中南大学 重载铁路工程结构教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-13 接受日期:2024-11-25 出版日期:2025-08-08 发布日期:2025-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 陈晓斌,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事交通岩土工程领域粗颗粒土工程性质研究。E-mail: chen_xiaobin@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:喻昭晟,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事红层泥岩崩解性质研究。E-mail: yuzhaosheng@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978674)

Release rate of disintegration surface and disintegration characteristics of red-layer soft rock

YU Zhao-sheng1, CHEN Xiao-bin1, 2, ZHOU Yu-qing1, LÜ Xin-long1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. MOE Key Laboratory of Engineering Structures of Heavy Haul Railway, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
  • Received:2024-08-13 Accepted:2024-11-25 Online:2025-08-08 Published:2025-08-27
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978674).

摘要: 红层软岩崩解特性随含水率的变化规律具有重要工程意义,准确地描述崩解特性需要提出合适的崩解指标。目前,广泛使用的干湿循环崩解试验无法测量崩解程度随含水率变化的连续过程,常用崩解指标(耐崩解指数Id与崩解率DR)无法准确地度量崩解程度和区分崩解特性差异。针对这问题,推导了散体材料表面积的计算方法,提出了崩解面释放率DS作用崩解指标,对比了不同崩解指标的差异;开展干湿循环浸水崩解试验,研究了循环次数对DS的影响;开展离散元法(discrete element method,DEM)模拟,研究了含水率对DS的影响。结果表明,DS存在准确物理含义,能准确描述崩解颗粒尺寸对崩解程度的影响。随着循环次数增加,在第2次干湿循环后DS变化率达到最大值,第5次崩解循环后DS趋于定值。随崩解时间t增加,DS表现出先增加后稳定的非线性变化,DS与饱和度Sr表现出线性关系。研究对于红层软岩工程应用与崩解预测具有重要意义。

关键词: 红层软岩, 崩解特性, 崩解指标, 离散元模拟

Abstract: The variation of the disintegration characteristics of red-layer soft rock with changes in water content has significant engineering importance. To accurately describe the disintegration characteristics, it is necessary to propose appropriate disintegration indices. Currently, widely used disintegration tests under drying-wetting cycles cannot measure the continuous process of disintegration rate as water content changes. Commonly used disintegration indices, disintegration resistance index Id and disintegration rate DR, are unable to accurately measure the degree of disintegration or distinguish differences in disintegration characteristics. To address this issue, a method for calculating the surface area of granular materials was derived. A new disintegration index, the disintegration surface release rate (DS), was proposed, and the differences between various disintegration indices were compared. Water immersion and disintegration tests were conducted to study the impact of the number of drying-wetting cycles on DS. Discrete element method (DEM) simulations were performed to study the impact of moisture content on DS. The results show that DS has an accurate physical meaning and accurately describing the influence of particle size on the disintegration rate. With the increase in the number of cycles, the DS change rate reaches its maximum after the second drying-wetting cycle, and DS tends to stabilize after the fifth disintegration cycle. As disintegration time (t) increases, DS exhibits a nonlinear change, initially increasing and then stabilizing. DS shows a linear relationship with saturation (Sr). This research is of great significance for the engineering application and disintegration prediction of red-layer soft rock.

Key words: red-layer soft rock, disintegration characteristics, disintegration indices, discrete element simulation

中图分类号: TU451
[1] 张杰, 聂如松, 黄茂桐, 谭永长, 李亚峰, . 道砟嵌入路基土三轴试验及离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1720-1730.
[2] 张贝, 李文阳, 毕研栋, 黄雨, . 离心-科氏复合条件下体积对滑坡碎屑流流动性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1560-1569.
[3] 刘翼飞, 布泽凡, 蔡东廷, 樊恒辉, 张卓, 茹含, 巨娟丽, . Si/Ca复合体系改性分散土的崩解特性及作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1341-1352.
[4] 孙佳政, 傅翼, 仇雅诗, 徐长节, 张恒志, 冯国辉, . RB模式下砂土非极限主动土压力的 离散元模拟与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 603-614.
[5] 王一伟, 刘 润, 孙若晗, 许泽伟. 基于抗转模型的颗粒材料宏−细观关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 945-956.
[6] 张恒志, 徐长节, 梁禄钜, 侯世磊, 范润东, 冯国辉, . RB模式下刚性挡墙有限土体主动土压力的 离散元模拟与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2895-2907.
[7] 周翠英, 梁宁, 刘镇, . 红层软岩压缩破坏的分形特征与级联失效过程[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 21-31.
[8] 周翠英, 黄思宇, 刘镇, 陆仪启, . 红层软岩软化的界面过程及其动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3189-3196.
[9] 蒋明镜 ,刘 蔚 ,孙 亚 ,张 宁 ,王华宁 . 考虑环境劣化非贯通节理岩体的直剪试验离散元模拟[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2728-2736.
[10] 张元超,杨圣奇,陈 淼,臧传伟,龙景奎,. 深井综放沿空掘巷实体煤帮变形破坏机制及控制技术[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1103-1113.
[11] 潘 艺,刘 镇,周翠英, . 红层软岩遇水崩解特性试验及其界面模型[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3231-3239.
[12] 杨 旭,苏定立,周 斌,刘 镇,周翠英,. 红层软岩模型试验相似材料的配比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2231-2237.
[13] 蒋建清 ,杨果林,. 格宾网加筋红层软岩土石混填路堤力学行为的现场测试与数值模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 156-165.
[14] 邱恩喜 ,康景文 ,郑立宁 ,郭永春 ,贺建军,. 成都地区含膏红层软岩溶蚀特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 274-280.
[15] 张 丹 ,陈安强 ,刘刚才 . 紫色泥岩水热条件下崩解过程的分维特性[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1341-1346.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!