岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (9): 2873-2884.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1324CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1324

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单向冻结条件下路基双层土体层间水分迁移机制研究

王天亮1, 2, 3,范帅波2, 3,高毅仁4,张飞1, 2,寇晓康1, 2   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 道路与铁道工程安全保障省部共建教育部重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043; 2. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043; 3. 石家庄铁道大学 省部共建交通工程结构力学行为与系统安全国家重点实验室,河北 石家庄 050043; 4. 石家庄铁道大学 交通运输学院,河北 石家庄 050043
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-27 接受日期:2025-01-06 出版日期:2025-09-10 发布日期:2025-09-04
  • 作者简介:王天亮,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土路基与轨道交通灾变控制方面的研究。E-mail: wangtl@stdu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.52378453);国家自然科学基金青年项目(No.52408485);河北省中央引导地方科技发展资金项目资助(No.254Z5401G)。

Water migration mechanism in double-layered soil under unidirectional freezing

WANG Tian-liang1, 2, 3, FAN Shuai-bo2, 3, GAO Yi-ren4, ZHANG Fei1, 2, KOU Xiao-kang1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Roads and Railway Engineering Safety Control of Ministry of Education, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Behavior and System Safety of Traffic Engineering Structures, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China; 4. College of Transportation, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050043, China
  • Received:2024-10-27 Accepted:2025-01-06 Online:2025-09-10 Published:2025-09-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52378453), the Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (52408485) and Central Government Guidance Fund for Local Science and Technology Development of Hebei Province (254Z5401G).

摘要: 通过室内土柱的单向梯度降温试验,分析土柱中存在两种土体情况下,不同填料的中值粒径与温度场、补水量、水分重分布及冻胀变形的变化情况,分析中值粒径对铁路路基粗颗粒填料层间水分迁移特征的影响。研究结果表明:在单向冻结时,改变下层土体而其他试验条件不变的情况下,相同温度边界下土体的温度变化过程基本一致,冻结深度无显著差别;重点考虑上下层土的中值粒径d50,提出上下层中值粒径比F50,用于评价上下层土粒径差距程度对层间水分迁移的影响。在上下层中值粒径比为1.40~3.24时补水相对较小,层间位置会发生水分集聚,随比值的增大,补水量越少,层间集聚效果越好,水分越难由下层进入上层,土柱冻胀变形越小。上下层的流速及水分迁移通道疏密程度有明显差别,上层较为稀疏,下层较为密集,以下层水分迁移速度较慢,上层水分迁移较快为主,层间水分集聚受水分迁移通道疏密程度影响较大;当上下层中值粒径比值过高或者过低时,水分在自下而上迁移过程中,均会于土柱层间突破。

关键词: 粗颗粒填料, 单向冻结, 双层土体, 水分迁移

Abstract: Through unidirectional gradient cooling tests on indoor soil columns, we analyzed changes in temperature distribution, water replenishment, water redistribution, and frost heave deformation under two soil types. We also examined how median particle size affects interlayer water migration in coarse-grained railway subgrade fillers. The results indicate that altering the lower layer soil while keeping other conditions constant during unidirectional freezing results in a similar temperature change process and no significant difference in freezing depth under the same temperature boundary. Focusing on the median particle size d50 of the upper and lower layers of soil, we propose the ratio F50 of their median particle sizes to assess the impact of particle size variation between these layers on interlayer water migration. When the ratio of median particle sizes between the upper and lower layers falls within the range of 1.40−3.24, water replenishment is relatively limited, leading to water accumulation at the interlayer interface. With an increasing ratio, water replenishment decreases further, enhancing interlayer accumulation, impeding water movement from the lower to the upper layer, and reducing frost heave deformation in the soil column. Additionally, notable disparities exist in flow rate and density of water migration pathways between the upper and lower layers, with the upper layer exhibiting lower density and the lower layer higher density. Water migration is slower in the lower layer but faster in the upper layer. The extent of interlayer water accumulation is significantly influenced by the density of water migration pathways. Extreme ratios of median particle sizes between the upper and lower layers can result in water breakthrough across interlayers during upward water migration within the soil column.

Key words: crude granular packing, one-way freezing, double-layered soil, moisture migration

中图分类号: TU445
[1] 雷华阳, 张文振, 冯双喜, 霍海峰, . 水汽补给下砂土水分迁移规律及冻胀特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 1-14.
[2] 陈汉青, 程桦, 曹广勇, 蔡海兵, 荣传新, 姚直书, . 冻土薄膜水压−吸单元模型的建立及试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2480-2488.
[3] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[4] 王震, 朱珍德, 陈会官, 朱姝, . 冻融作用下岩石力-热-水耦合本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2608-2616.
[5] 黎瀚文,张璐璐,冯世进,郑文棠,. 复杂大气环境作用下高铁路基水分迁移响应[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2574-2582.
[6] 张沛然,黄雪峰,杨校辉,刘自龙,朱中华,. 盐渍土水-热场耦合效应与盐胀变形试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1619-1624.
[7] 魏厚振, 周家作,韦昌富,陈 盼. 饱和粉土冻结过程中的水分迁移试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2547-2552.
[8] 刘泉声 ,黄诗冰 ,康永水 ,刘建平,. 裂隙冻胀压力及对岩体造成的劣化机制初步研究[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1530-1541.
[9] 王永涛 ,王大雁 ,马 巍 ,穆彦虎 ,关 辉 ,顾同欣,. 青藏粉质黏土单向冻结冷生构造发育及冻胀发展过程试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1333-1342.
[10] 李彦龙,王 俊,王铁行,. 温度梯度作用下非饱和土水分迁移研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2839-2844.
[11] 张莲海 ,马 巍 ,杨成松,. 冻融循环过程中土体的孔隙水压力测试研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1856-1864.
[12] 曾桂军 ,张明义 ,李振萍 ,裴万胜,. 饱和正冻土水分迁移及冻胀模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1085-1092.
[13] 阴琪翔 ,周国庆 ,赵晓东 ,路贵林,. 双向冻结-单向融化土压缩性及水分迁移试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1021-1026.
[14] 刘 杰,姚海林,胡梦玲,卢 正,余东明,陈风光. 水位波动下路基湿度动态响应及地下防排水模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2917-2922.
[15] 李国玉,马 巍,穆彦虎,李兴柏,毛云程. 多年冻土区石油污染物迁移过程试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 83-89.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!