岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 3501-3512.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1581CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1581

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同加载速率下岩充组合体的协同破坏特征研究

孙思瑞1, 2, 3,杜献杰1, 2, 3, 4, 5,冯国瑞1, 2, 3, 6,刘文昊1, 2, 3, 7,王军1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 矿山岩层控制及灾害防控山西省重点实验室,山西 太原 030024; 3. 山西浙大新材料与化工研究院,山西 太原 030024;4. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116; 5. 郑州煤炭工业(集团)有限责任公司,河南 郑州 450042;6. 山西能源学院,山西 晋中 030604; 7. 山东山科数字经济研究院有限公司,山东 济南 250101
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-22 接受日期:2025-03-20 出版日期:2025-11-14 发布日期:2025-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 杜献杰,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事矿山充填开采与地下空间开发。E-mail:duxianjie@tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:孙思瑞,男,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事煤矿充填开采稳定性研究。E-mail:2745220072@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西浙大新材料与化工研究院科研项目(No. 2022SX-TD008,No. 2021SX-TD001);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(No. 2022M712922);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51925402,No. 52004173)。

Synergistic failure characteristics of rock-backfill composite with different loading rates

SUN Si-rui1, 2, 3, DU Xian-jie1, 2, 3, 4, 5, FENG Guo-rui1, 2, 3, 6, LIU Wen-hao1, 2, 3, 7, WANG Jun1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. Shanxi Key Laboratory of Mine Rock Strata Control and Disaster Prevention, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 3. Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 4. State Key Laboratory of Deep Geotechnical Mechanics and Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 5. Zhengzhou Coal industry (Group) Co. Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450042, China; 6. Shanxi Energy College, Jinzhong, Shanxi 030604, China; 7. Shandong Shanke Digital Economy Research Institute Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250101, China
  • Received:2024-12-22 Accepted:2025-03-20 Online:2025-11-14 Published:2025-11-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering (2022SX-TD008, 2021SX-TD001), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M712922) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51925402, 52004173).

摘要: 在结构充填开采中,“充填体-直接顶”复合承载结构会因采充速度等条件的不同,承受不同加载速率的载荷。按0.15~2.40 mm/min的加载速率分别对5组“粉砂岩-充填体”岩充组合体进行单轴压缩试验,进行数字图像相关技术与声发射监测,并分析其能量损耗演变特征。由试验可知,粉砂岩的强度显著大于组合体与充填体的强度,组合体的强度相较于粉砂岩更接近充填体的强度。加载速率为0.60 mm/min时,试件强度达到最高,为该组试验的临界加载速率。在组合体加载速率为0.15~0.60 mm/min时实现了试件的协同变形破坏,而加载速率为1.20~2.40 mm/min时未能实现协同变形破坏,组合体试件最终破坏模式为拉剪混合破坏模式。当加载速率低于0.60 mm/min时,岩充组合体试样中由于粉砂岩与充填体的强度差异以及两者接触界面非均匀变形共同作用下,出现贯穿试件整体大裂纹。当加载速率小于0.60 mm/min时,组合体的峰前耗散比大于充填单体。通过计算岩充组合体在不同加载速率下的储能系数与储能极限发现,当加载速率小于0.60 mm/min时,加载速率越大,组合体试件的储能极限越高,而吸收弹性能的速度也在同步上升,最后充填体部分率先发生破坏,其瞬间破坏释放的能量被传递到组合体的砂岩部分中,使粉砂岩部分所吸收的弹性能可达到储能极限,充填体部分中裂纹扩展贯通至砂岩内部,实现协同破坏;研究结果以期为保障煤矿结构充填开采的开采率与安全性提供指导性意见。

关键词: 岩充组合结构, 加载速率, 协同变形, 能量耗损演变, 结构充填开采

Abstract: In the constructural backfill mining, the composite bearing structure of 'backfill body-immediate roof' structure will be subjected to different loading rates depending on the mining speed and other conditions. According to the loading rate of 0.15− 2.40 mm/min, the uniaxial compression test of five groups of rock-backfill composite were carried out, and digital image correlation technology and acoustic emission monitoring were carried out to analyze the evolutionary characteristics of its energy loss. It can be seen from the experiment that the strength of siltstone is significantly greater than the strength of the rock-backfill composite and the backfill body, and the strength of the combination is closer to the strength of the filling body than the siltstone. It can be seen that 0.60 mm/min is the critical load for this group of experiments. When the loading rate of the rock-backfill composite is 0.15− 0.60 mm/min, the rock-backfill composite ultimately realizes the synergistic deformation of the siltstone and the backfill body in the rock-backfill composite and destruction of the rock-backfill composite in the process of loading, and when the loading rates are 1.20−2.40 mm/min, rock-backfill composite failed to achieve the collaborative deformation damage of the siltstone and the backfill body parts. When the loading rate is lower than 0.60 mm / min, due to the strength difference between the siltstone and the filling body and the non-uniform deformation of the contact interface between the two, a large crack penetrates the whole specimen. It can be seen that the final failure mode of each group of specimens is a tensile and shear mixed failure mode. By analyzing the dissipation energy changes of the rock-backfill composite and the backfill body, it can be seen that when the loading rate is greater than the critical loading rate, the pre-peak dissipation ratio of the rock-backfill composite is greater than that of the backfill body, and the composite can be destroyed in a coordinated manner. By calculating the energy storage coefficient and energy storage limit of the rock-backfill composite under different loading rates, it is found that when the loading rate is less than 0.60 mm/min, the higher the loading rate, the higher the energy storage limit of the combination specimen, and the speed of absorbing elastic energy is also rising synchronously. Finally, the backfill body part is destroyed first, and the energy released by the instantaneous damage is transmitted to the siltstone part of the rock-backfill composite, so that the elastic energy absorbed by the siltstone part can reach the energy storage limit. The crack in the backfill body part extends into the sandstone to achieve synergistic damage. The results of this study are intended to provide suggestions for ensuring the stability of the composite bearing structure of ' backfill body-immediate roof ' structure under different mining and filling rates.

Key words: rock-backfill composite structure, loading rate, collaborative deformation, evolution of energy consumption, constructional backfill mining

中图分类号: TD 823
[1] 马春德, 康子豪, 阳文源, 谭观霜, 赵俊康, . 不同加载速率下花岗岩多期应力记忆方向独立性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1709-1718.
[2] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[3] 杨昊天, 吴红刚, 韦洪, 赖国泉, 尹威江, . 降雨条件下三级桥基岸坡−BFRP锚杆体系的协同变形机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 267-276.
[4] 祝恩阳, 陈玉堃. 考虑加载速率影响的结构性软黏土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 63-72.
[5] 刘勇健, 傅杨攀, 赖明洋, 李彰明, 方昊圆, 谢治堃, . 冲击荷载下土体动力响应与加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2485-2494.
[6] 陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[7] 刘玉春, 荆刚, 赵扬锋, 樊艺, 潘一山, . 加载速率与断层倾角对断层矿震失稳影响 的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 35-45.
[8] 王凯, 杨宝贵, 王鹏宇, 李冲, . 软弱厚煤层沿空留巷变形破坏特征及控制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1913-1924.
[9] 李福林, 杨健, 刘卫群, 范振华, 杨玉贵, . 单轴压缩条件下泥岩加载速率变化效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 369-378.
[10] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
[11] 邓华锋,王晨玺杰,李建林,张吟钗,王 伟,张恒宾. 加载速率对砂岩抗拉强度的影响机制[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 79-88.
[12] 张 明,姜福兴,李家卓,焦振华,胡 浩,舒凑先,高化军,. 基于巨厚岩层-煤柱协同变形的煤柱稳定性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 705-714.
[13] 肖晓春,丁 鑫,赵 鑫,潘一山,王爱文,王 磊,. 加载速率影响的煤体破裂过程声-电荷试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3419-3426.
[14] 宋义敏,邢同振,邓琳琳,赵泽鑫. 不同加载速率下岩石变形场演化试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2773-2779.
[15] 张学朋,蒋宇静,王 刚,王建昌,吴学震,张永政,. 基于颗粒离散元模型的不同加载速率下花岗岩数值试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2679-2686.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!