岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 3673-3682.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1609CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1609

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

电解减饱和处理后砂土的非饱和状态稳定性研究

叶斌,蒋记澳,朱家志,丁 源,林创基   

  1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-30 接受日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2025-12-11 发布日期:2025-12-13
  • 作者简介:叶斌,男,1977年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事砂土液化灾害机制与防控的研究。E-mail: yebin@tongji.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2024YFF0507903);国家自然科学基金(No.42372332)。

Stability of the unsaturated state of sand after electrolysis desaturation treatment

YE Bin, JIANG Ji-ao, ZHU Jia-zhi, DING Yuan, LIN Chuang-ji   

  1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2024-12-30 Accepted:2025-04-10 Online:2025-12-11 Published:2025-12-13
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFF0507903) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42372332).

摘要: 减饱和法是一种新型的抗液化技术,其基本原理是通过向砂土地基孔隙中引入适量气体,降低土体的饱和度,从而提高其液化抵抗能力。这一方法为解决砂土地基液化问题提供了一种简便且经济的途径。然而,处理后土体非饱和状态的长期稳定性是影响减饱和工法抗液化效果和经济性的关键问题,目前相关研究较少。采用电解减饱和技术对初始饱和砂土地基进行减饱和处理,研究了不同条件下土体饱和度的变化,包括静水条件和在一定水力梯度下渗流的动水条件,并分析了水力梯度、粒径级配、相对密实度及初始饱和度等多种因素对减饱和试样饱和度变化的影响。试验结果表明,孔隙水渗流作用会使砂土试样饱和度逐渐增加,但最终将趋于稳定,且水力梯度越大,饱和度稳定值越大;在相同渗流条件下,试样的相对密实度和颗粒粒径越小,土体饱和度的最终变化量越小。此外,通过降低电解后试样的初始饱和度也会使饱和度最终稳定值减小。

关键词: 减饱和法, 砂土液化, 饱和度, 长期稳定性

Abstract: Desaturation method is an innovative method to reduce the liquefaction risk of sandy grounds. The mechanism is to reduce soil saturation by introducing gas into soil pores, thereby increasing liquefaction resistance. This method provides a simple but economical solution to liquefaction of sandy soils. However, the long-term stability of the unsaturated state of the treated sand is a critical issue affecting the anti-liquefaction efficacy and economical efficiency of the desaturation method, and there are few related studies currently. In this study, an originally saturated sandy ground was desaturated by electrolytic desaturation method, and the change in saturation was investigated under different conditions, including hydrostatic and hydraulic gradient flow conditions. Additionally, the effects of hydraulic gradient, particle size distribution, relative density, and initial saturation degree on the saturation change of the specimens were analyzed. The results show that pore-water seepage gradually increases the saturation degree of the specimens until it stabilizes. A larger hydraulic gradient yields a higher final stable saturation degree. Under the same seepage conditions, smaller relative density and finer particle size lead to smaller final changes in saturation. In addition, decreasing the saturation of the specimen after electrolysis reduces the final stable saturation degree.

Key words: desaturation method, sand liquefaction, saturation degree, long-term stability

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 张淼, 李林, 郑瀚波, 李盼盼, . 考虑饱和度影响的结构性黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2816-2824.
[2] 邹诗环, 黄茂松, 时振昊, . 高饱和度含气土动力问题的有限体积法分步解法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1286-1293.
[3] 刘祥宁, 张文杰, . 酸性干湿循环下铬污染土固化体浸出行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1196-1204.
[4] 杨柳, 吉明秀, 赵艳, 耿振坤, 李思源, 马雄德, 张谦, . 致密砂岩孔隙结构对两相驱替特征及CO2封存效率的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1187-1195.
[5] 刘畅, 代丽媛, 李彪, 童富果, 田斌, 周铨. 干湿循环作用下宽饱和度范围红壤土强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3811-3822.
[6] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[7] 黄楠, 朱斌, 王路君, . 考虑水合物孔隙赋存模式演化的含水合物沉积物渗透率模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2387-2396.
[8] 李金宇, 王伟, 王浩宇, 杨研科, 徐凯放, 张晓庆, 熊文. 地震序列作用下液化场地条件影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1551-1559.
[9] 罗晓倩, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 田升奎, . 不同饱和度下膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验及强度响应特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 153-163.
[10] 王晓磊, 刘理腾, 刘润, 刘历波, 董林, 任海. 地震历史对各深度土体抗液化性影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2657-2666.
[11] 祁妍敏, 汪淼, 章定文, 林文丽, . 甲基叔丁基醚污染黏土的Archie电阻率模型修正方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1719-1728.
[12] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[13] 赵煜鑫, 李 旭, 赵红芬, 刘 艳. 宽饱和度范围非饱和土抗剪强度指标的演化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2809-2820.
[14] 王维铭, 陈龙伟, 郭婷婷, 汪云龙, 凌贤长, . 基于中国砂土液化数据库的标准贯入试验液化 判别方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 279-288.
[15] 阙云, 翁斌, 蔡松林, LIU Jin-yuan, . 非饱和透明土优先流迁移规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 857-867.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!