岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 183-197.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0062CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0062

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

缓冲层影响下软岩大变形隧道时效力学行为分析

吴奎1,王子岩1,徐晨2,杨跃宗1,赵南南1   

  1. 1.西安建筑科技大学 理学院,陕西 西安 710055;2.宁波大学 岩石力学研究所,浙江 宁波 315211
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-16 接受日期:2025-03-31 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 赵南南,男,1993年生,博士,讲师,主要从事隧道施工力学方面的研究。E-mail: zhaonannan@xauat.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:吴奎,男,1994年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地下工程灾变力学与防灾减灾方面的研究。E-mail: wukuigz@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12202334,No.52408438);陕西省重点研发计划(No.2025SF-YBXM-553);中国博士后科学基金(No.2024MD753969);陕西省留学人员科技活动择优资助项目(No.2023-021)。

Analysis of time-dependent mechanical behaviour of soft rock tunnels with large deformation considering buffer layer influence

WU Kui1, WANG Zi-yan1, XU Chen2, YANG Yue-zong1, ZHAO Nan-nan1   

  1. 1. School of Science, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710055, China; 2. Institute of Rock Mechanics, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China
  • Received:2025-01-16 Accepted:2025-03-31 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12202334, 52408438), Shaanxi Province Key Research and Development Project (2025SF-YBXM-553), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024MD753969) and the Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars Funded by Shaanxi Provincial Government (2023-021).

摘要: 缓冲层的应用为解决隧道二衬开裂难题提供了一种有效方案。不同缓冲层材料力学特性差异显著,建立具有广泛适用性的理论模型十分必要。为此,首先将缓冲层材料的非线性压缩应力-应变曲线划分为n个变形阶段,并利用直线进行替代来描述该阶段的变形特征;其次,建立了考虑缓冲层影响的流变围岩与支护相互作用的力学模型,利用围岩-缓冲层界面以及缓冲层-二衬界面在整个相互作用过程中的界面变形协调条件,分别给出了处于缓冲层材料不同变形阶段的隧道位移以及各界面接触压力的解析解;进一步,通过与既有文献结果以及数值模拟结果的对比,所建立理论模型的有效性得到了验证;最后,利用理论模型分别对含聚氨酯和聚乙烯(具有不同变形特征)泡沫缓冲层的隧道力学响应开展了相关的参数分析。结果表明:此理论模型适用于不同的缓冲层材料,且缓冲层材料变形阶段的划分对预测结果具有显著影响;对聚氨酯泡沫缓冲层而言,不考虑变形阶段划分比考虑时的二衬压力预测值高出35.2%,而使用聚乙烯泡沫缓冲层,不考虑比考虑时预测值甚至高出96%;对某一隧道而言,缓冲层厚度存在一个合理的范围,本计算工况下聚氨酯和聚乙烯泡沫缓冲层厚度最优值均为25 cm;安装缓冲层对长期变形效应显著的隧道更有益,可有效缓解二衬压力,保证其长期安全。

关键词: 软岩隧道, 时效变形, 缓冲层, 变形协调, 理论模型

Abstract: The application of buffer layer provides an effective solution to the problem of secondary lining failure. Different buffer layer materials exhibit significant variations in mechanical properties, making it essential to establish a widely applicable theoretical model. For this purpose, this study firstly divides the nonlinear compressive stress-strain curve of buffer layer materials into n deformation stages, and the deformation characteristic of each stage is described by replacing with a straight line. Secondly, an interaction mechanical model between rheological surrounding rock and support considering the effect of the buffer layer is established. By using the deformation coordination in both the surrounding rock-buffer layer interface and the buffer layer-secondary lining interface during the whole interaction process, analytical solutions for tunnel displacement and contact pressures at different interfaces during various deformation stages of buffer layer materials are presented. Furthermore, the effectiveness of the proposed theoretical model is validated by comparison with previous studies and numerical results. Finally, a parametric analysis of the mechanical responses of tunnels with polyurethane and polyethylene foam buffer layers (with differing deformation characteristics) is carried out based on the theoretical model. The results show that the proposed model is applicable to different buffer layer materials. The division of deformation stages in buffer layer materials significantly impacts prediction outcomes. For polyurethane foam buffer layer, the prediction result of the secondary lining pressure without considering the deformation stage division is 35.2% higher than that under consideration, while for polyethylene foam buffer layer, the predicted value is even 96% higher than that considering the deformation stage division. For a given tunnel, the thickness of buffer layer has a reasonable range, with an optimal thickness of 25 cm for both polyurethane and polyethylene foam buffer layers under these conditions. Installing a buffer layer is more beneficial for tunnels subject to significant long-term deformation, as it effectively reduces secondary lining pressure and ensures long-term safety.

Key words: soft rock tunnel, time-dependent deformation, buffer layer, deformation coordination, theoretical model

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 曾召田, 林铭宇, 孙德安, 邵捷昇, 曹珊珊, 赵长友, 靳琳. 高温条件下膨润土缓冲层材料导热性能的热老化时间效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 171-182.
[2] 江文豪, 冯晨, 黄啸, 李江山, . 缓冲层−复合隔离墙−含水层系统中有机污染物二维运移规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 731-741.
[3] 江文豪, 冯晨, 李江山, . 考虑温度变化下三层复合衬垫中重金属污染物一维运移理论模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 417-432.
[4] 舒晓云, 田洪铭, 陈卫忠, 朱珍德, 杨帆, 田云, 张朝轩, 张韬, . 某引水隧洞大变形缓冲层支护方案设计参数优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3117-3129.
[5] 邓鹏海, 刘泉声, 黄兴. 隧道底板渐进破裂碎胀大变形:一种新的底鼓机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1512-1529.
[6] 莫品强, 刘尧, 黄子丰, 滕鸿博, 陈斌, 陶祥令, . 复杂支护条件下深基坑支护桩−冠梁−支撑 的变形协调及空间效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2592-2601.
[7] 董建华, 吴晓磊, 师利君, 于小燕, 何鹏飞, . 多年冻土区L型挡墙水平冻胀效应计算方法与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 879-890.
[8] 向伏林, 杨天亮, 顾凯, 施斌, 刘春, 刘苏平, 张诚成, 姜月华, . 钻孔全断面分布式光纤监测中光缆-土体变形协调性的离散元数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1743-1754.
[9] 田云, 陈卫忠, 田洪铭, 赵明, 曾春涛. 考虑软岩强度时效弱化的缓冲层让压支护设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 237-245.
[10] 周洪福, 刘彬, . 考虑荷载方向效应的软硬相间层状岩体 综合变形模量取值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3066-3076.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 雷升祥, 赵伟. 软岩隧道大变形环向让压支护机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1039-1047.
[13] 王立业, 周凤玺, 秦虎, . 饱和盐渍土分数阶蠕变模型及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 543-551.
[14] 陈卫忠, 田 云, 王学海, 田洪铭, 曹怀轩, 谢华东, . 基于修正[BQ]值的软岩隧道挤压变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3125-3134.
[15] 周 勇,朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!