岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 219-228.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0165CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0165

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜坡埋地管道隆升模型试验研究

王德洋1, 2,朱鸿鹄2,喻文昭2, 3,谢天铖2,蒋昕飞2,谭道远2   

  1. 1.安徽理工大学 地球与环境学院,安徽 淮南232001;2.南京大学 地球科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210023; 3.湖北地矿建设工程承包集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430032
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-17 接受日期:2025-06-10 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-08
  • 通讯作者: 朱鸿鹄,男,1979年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、岩土力学方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail: zhh@nju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王德洋,男,1991年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下工程监测方面的研究与教学工作。E-mail: 2024128@aust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    安徽理工大学高层次引进人才科研启动基金资助(No.2024yjrc91);安徽省自然科学基金青年基金项目(No. ZX20250142);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No. 42225702);国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目(No.4241101112)。

Experimental study on uplift behavior of buried pipelines in sloped terrain

WANG De-yang1, 2, ZHU Hong-hu2, YU Wen-zhao2, 3, XIE Tian-cheng2, JIANG Xin-fei2, TAN Dao-yuan2   

  1. 1. School of Earth and Environment, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China; 3. Hubei Dijian Construction Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430032, China
  • Received:2025-02-17 Accepted:2025-06-10 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Foundation for High-level Talents of Anhui University of Science and Technology (2024yjrc91), the National Science Fund for Young Scholars of Anhui Provincial ( ZX20250142), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (42225702) and the International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4241101112).

摘要: 竖向隆升屈曲是埋地管道失稳破坏的主要形式之一,对管道运输安全构成了严重的威胁。目前,相关研究多聚焦于平坦场地条件下的管道隆升屈曲行为,而对于斜坡场地条件下管道隆升破坏机制的关注较少。基于分布式光纤感测和粒子图像测速技术,开展了斜坡埋地管道隆升破坏的模型试验研究,系统分析了不同坡角与埋深率条件下土体变形破坏机制及管道隆升土抗力的发挥机制。研究结果表明:(1)随着坡角的增大,管道隆升过程中土抗力峰值逐渐减小;而随着埋深率的增大,峰值土抗力和残余土抗力显著增加;(2)在不同坡角与埋深率条件下,管道隆升土抗力达到残余值时的管道位移量约为0.2DD为管道外直径);(3)管道隆升过程中,横截面呈现“椭圆化”变形,管道上方土体形成楔形破坏体。在此基础上,结合应力莫尔圆理论,提出了一种适用于斜坡场地条件下管道隆升峰值土抗力的计算方法。相关结论有助于揭示斜坡地形下埋地管道及周围土体的变形破坏机制,可为复杂地形条件下管道结构的设计与安全评估提供理论支持与工程参考。

关键词: 埋地管道;光频域反射(optical frequency domain reflectometry, 简称OFDR);粒子图像测速(particle image velocimetry, 简称PIV);土-管相互作用;土抗力

Abstract: Vertical upheaval buckling is a critical instability mode in buried pipelines and poses substantial risks to pipeline safety. Most prior studies have focused on upheaval behavior under flat terrain, with limited attention to failure mechanisms on slopes. In this study, model tests of buried-pipeline upheaval on slopes were conducted using distributed fiber-optic sensing and particle image velocimetry (PIV). We systematically analyzed soil deformation and failure mechanisms, and the mobilization of uplift resistance, under varying slope angles and burial-depth ratios. The results show that, 1) Increasing slope angle gradually reduces the soil’s peak uplift resistance, while higher burial-depth ratios significantly enhance both peak and residual uplift resistances. 2) Regardless of slope angle or burial depth, the pipeline displacement at the onset of residual resistance is approximately 0.2D, where D is the pipe outer diameter. 3) During the uplift process, the pipe cross-section undergoes ovalization, and a wedge-shaped failure zone forms in the overlying soil. Based on these findings and Mohr’s circle theory, we propose a method to calculate the peak soil resistance of pipelines under slope conditions. These findings advance understanding of soil–pipeline interaction on sloped terrain and provide theoretical and practical guidance for the design and safety assessment of buried pipelines in complex geological settings.

Key words: buried pipeline, optical frequency domain reflectometry (OFDR), particle image velocimetry (PIV), soil-pipe interaction, soil resistance

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 周亚东, 吴松林, 邢蓓琪, 李玉龙. 真空预压-加热联合作用下竖井地基大变形固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 571-580.
[2] 叶新宇, 王博, 张升, 刘蔚, 黄攀, 赵炳震. 考虑土体剪切和压缩耦合作用的节泡型锚杆蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 27-38.
[3] 林沛元, 刘彤, 杨翔云, 丁庆峰, 袁勋. 土钉-花岗岩残积土界面抗剪强度水弱化累积效应试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 229-244.
[4] 蒋水华, 钟越, 谢佳伟, 吕胜才, 周安楠, 黄劲松. 基于边界字典-随机森林模型的三维岩土地层重构方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 267-280.
[5] 李小刚, 武守信, 冯君, . 基于极限分析理论的悬索桥重力锚垂直齿坎抗滑力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2547-2558.
[6] 佘磊, 赵阳, 李炎隆, 李东锋, 宋卿, 郑继光, 陈晨, . 基于隧道掘进机掘进参数的现场岩体力学参数快速估计方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1595-1604.
[7] 张振波, 李秉欣, 杨茜, 刘志春, 刘义, . 近接基坑工程有限土体失稳模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 266-277.
[8] 王立安, 余云燕, 任新, 陈辉, . 循环荷载作用下分数阶饱和黏土地基的动力固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2279-2289.
[9] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[10] 孙锦鑫, 卢萌盟, 刘干斌, . 高置换率散体材料桩-不透水桩组合型复合地基非线性固结解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2421-2436.
[11] 王亦炀, 李传勋, 李阔, 陆向综. 竖井地基大应变非线性固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1446-1456.
[12] 熊根, 付栋康, 朱斌, 赖莹, . 软黏土中吸力锚承载特性离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1472-1480.
[13] 朱晶, 裴强强, 郭青林, 张博, . 基于尺寸效应的夯土水盐运移分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1481-1494.
[14] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 国内外静力触探液化判别方法对比检验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
[15] 张治国, 毛敏东, 王卫东, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 降雨影响下基坑开挖施工对邻近基桩变形响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 27-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!