岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 1041-1055.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0518CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0518

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桩间水平土拱作用下滑坡推力的分配机制及简化计算方法研究

成栋1, 2,朱彦鹏1, 2,杨校辉1, 2,张兴旺1, 2,张育恺1, 2   

  1. 1. 兰州理工大学 土木与水利工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050;2. 兰州理工大学 西部土木工程防灾减灾教育部工程研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730050
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-19 接受日期:2025-12-28 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通讯作者: 朱彦鹏,男,1960年生,硕士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事支挡结构、工程事故分析与处理等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: zhuyp1@163.com
  • 作者简介:成栋,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事支挡结构方面的研究工作。E-mail: ddong1996@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51978321,No.52568052);甘肃省科技重大专项项目(No.23ZDFA007)。

Mechanism and simplified calculation method for landslide thrust distribution under horizontal soil arching between adjacent piles

CHENG Dong1, 2, ZHU Yan-peng1, 2, YANG Xiao-hui1, 2, ZHANG Xing-wang1, 2, ZHANG Yu-kai1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, Gansu 730050, China; 2. Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
  • Received:2025-05-19 Accepted:2025-12-28 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978321, 52568052) and the Major Projects of Science and Technology of Gansu Province of China (23ZDFA007).

摘要: 在滑坡治理工程中,离散的抗滑桩需依托桩间水平土拱形成连续抗滑面。为揭示桩间水平土拱作用下滑坡推力的分配机制并给出合理计算方法,利用有限元软件分析桩间水平土拱对滑坡推力的传递与分配特性,表明桩间水平土拱作用下仍有部分滑坡推力传递至拱前土体处,且当达到一定深度后,向两侧抗滑桩的荷载传递系数趋于稳定。根据Mohr-Coulomb强度准则确定土拱拱脚处破裂面位置,以向两侧抗滑桩荷载分配最优为原则确定土拱高跨比,进而基于极限平衡法给出了桩间水平土拱作用下滑坡推力向两侧抗滑桩的荷载传递系数简化计算方法,与数值模拟、模型试验结果对比验证其正确性。选取土体黏聚力、内摩擦角及桩间距进行参数分析。结果表明,当桩间距小于3倍桩径且滑体黏聚力与内摩擦角较大时,基本可以认为桩后滑坡推力全部作用于抗滑桩。研究成果可为抗滑桩滑坡推力的确定提供理论依据,有助于提高桩身内力、变形分析的准确性及工程设计的可靠性。

关键词: 滑坡推力, 桩间水平土拱, 极限平衡法, 破裂面, 高跨比

Abstract: In landslide stabilization engineering, discretely arranged anti-slide piles establish a continuous resisting surface by mobilizing horizontal soil arching effects between adjacent piles. To elucidate the distribution mechanism of landslide thrust under the inter-pile horizontal soil arching effect and establish a rational calculation method, a finite element analysis was first conducted to investigate the transmission and distribution characteristics of landslide thrust. The results demonstrate that a portion of the landslide thrust continues to propagate into the soil ahead of the arch under the soil arching action. Beyond a critical depth, the load transfer coefficient toward adjacent anti-slide piles stabilizes, indicating a convergence in load redistribution patterns. Subsequently, based on the Mohr-Coulomb strength criterion, the position of the failure surface at the arch foot is determined. Following the principle of prioritizing load distribution to the adjacent anti-slide piles, the height-to-span ratio of the soil arch is established. A calculation method for load transfer coefficient of landslide thrust to the piles under inter-pile horizontal soil arching is then established using the limit equilibrium method. The validity of this method is verified through comparative analysis with results of numerical simulation and model test. Finally, a parametric analysis was performed by selecting the cohesion and internal friction angle of the soil and the pile spacing. The results indicate that when the pile spacing is less than 3 times the pile diameter and the soil cohesion and internal friction angle are sufficiently high, the landslide thrust behind the piles can be considered entirely transferred to the anti-slide piles. The findings provide a theoretical basis for determining the landslide thrust on anti-slide piles, thereby improving the accuracy of pile internal force and deformation analysis as well as the reliability of engineering design.

Key words: landslide thrust, inter-pile horizontal soil arching, limit equilibrium method, failure surface, ratio of vector height to span

中图分类号: U216.41+9.1
[1] 徐杰, 张振光, 李海祥. 考虑空间土拱效应的非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 245-254.
[2] 彭海游, 谢强, 陈柏林, 檀康, 王琦, 杨文君, . 基于极限平衡法的危岩倾覆稳定性三维计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 552-562.
[3] 易琪, 孙冠华, 姚院峰, 桂本, 商浩亮, 纪文栋, . 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库上覆岩体稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3523-3532.
[4] 周志雄, 周凤玺, 曹小林, 汪镇, . 复合地基极限承载力的变分极限平衡法分析——竖向增强[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3748-3754.
[5] 傅翔, 黄平, 谢强, 班宇鑫, 苏焓. 不同高孔隙水压砂岩三轴压缩力学特性及多向破裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2611-2618.
[6] 姬楠, 吴祥云, 任辉启, 翟超辰, 张跃飞, 赵荣国, 聂晓东, . 岩石中平面装药爆炸作用下不同高跨比结构抗爆性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2276-2286.
[7] 徐方, 张期树, 冷伍明, 邓志龙, 董俊利, 刘思慧, . 基于附加应力扩散效应的新型预应力路堤 稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 431-442.
[8] 仉文岗, 王琦, 刘汉龙, 陈福勇, . 岩体空间变异性对隧道拱顶失效概率的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1462-1472.
[9] 刘胤池, 李庶林, 唐超. 岩体破裂震源机制解类型判据的改进及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1335-1344.
[10] 章瑞环, 叶帅华, 陶晖. 基于改进极限平衡法的多级均质黄土边 坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 813-825.
[11] 孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[12] 李英俊, 夏元友, 王智德. 地震作用下土钉支护边坡震后位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3013-3021.
[13] 赵晓彦, 范宇飞, 刘亮, 蒋楚生, . 铁路台阶式加筋土挡墙潜在破裂面特征模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2108-2118.
[14] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[15] 闫澍旺,李 嘉,闫 玥,陈 浩,. 黏性土地基中竖向圆孔的极限稳定深度研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1176-1181.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!