岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3589-3601.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1098CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1098

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深部巷道薄层状围岩屈曲破坏过程及应力-结构作用机制研究

孔瑞1,朱家宬1,江权2,王晓南3,丁勇3,汪昕1   

  1. 1.东北大学 深部金属矿智能开采与装备全国重点实验室,辽宁 沈阳 110819; 2.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 3.本溪龙新矿业有限公司,辽宁 本溪 117013
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-13 接受日期:2026-03-15 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-09
  • 作者简介:孔瑞,男,1990年生,博士,副教授,主要从事深部工程岩体力学与安全方面的研究。E-mail: kongrui@mail.neu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2023YFC2907204);辽宁省科学技术计划(No.2023JH1/10400004);国家自然科学基金(No.52339001)。

Buckling failure process and stress-structure control mechanism of thinly layered surrounding rock in deep roadways

KONG Rui1, ZHU Jia-cheng1, JIANG Quan2, WANG Xiao-nan3, DING Yong3, WANG Xin1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Deep Metal Mining and Equipment, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. Benxi Longxin Mining Co., Ltd., Benxi, Liaoning 117013, China
  • Received:2025-10-13 Accepted:2026-03-15 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2907204), the Science and Technology Program of Liaoning Province (2023JH1/10400004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52339001).

摘要: 针对思山岭铁矿深部巷道薄层状围岩屈曲破坏问题,采用现场调查、原位监测和理论分析等方法,总结了屈曲破坏特征,阐明了应力和结构对屈曲破坏的控制作用及机制,提出了屈曲破坏防控建议。结果表明:屈曲破坏演化过程可归纳为裂纹萌生、劈裂成板、岩板弯曲和折断垮落4个阶段。开挖时围岩应力差增加使得岩体内裂纹扩展并最终贯通形成多层岩板,随后岩板在多向荷载共同作用下向临空面侧发生弯曲折断。屈曲破坏为应力-结构控制型破坏,侧向应力和法向应力均会促进岩板弯曲折断,且由于应力梯度分布,岩板折断优先从围岩内部高应力集中区发生。岩体层理走向与巷道轴线夹角越小,裂纹越易沿层理面扩展。建议采用裂化抑制思想,通过加强支护和优化采场布置方向两种措施进行屈曲破坏控制。本研究有助于保障思山岭铁矿安全高效开采,并为同类层状岩体工程的破坏分析与防治提供借鉴。

关键词: 深部巷道, 薄层状围岩, 屈曲破坏, 力学机制

Abstract: To address the buckling failure observed in the thinly layered surrounding rock of deep roadways at the Sishanling iron mine, a comprehensive approach encompassing field investigation, in situ monitoring, and theoretical analysis was adopted. This study summarized the characteristics of buckling failure, elucidated the control effects and mechanisms of stress and structural factors on such failure, and proposed corresponding prevention and control strategies. The results indicate that the buckling failure evolution process can be summarized into four stages, including crack initiation, slab formation through splitting, rock slab buckling, and ultimate fracturing accompanied by collapse. During excavation, an increased stress differential in the surrounding rock facilitates crack propagation and eventual coalescence within the rock mass, thereby forming multilayer rock slabs. These slabs subsequently undergo bending and fracturing toward the free face under multidirectional loading. Buckling failure is a stress-structure controlled failure mode, wherein both lateral stress and normal stress contribute to the bending and fracturing of rock slabs. Due to stress gradient distribution, rock slab fracturing preferentially occurs in the high-stress concentration areas within the surrounding rock. Moreover, a smaller included angle between the bedding plane strike and roadway axis promotes crack propagation along bedding planes. It is recommended to adopt the cracking suppression concept to control the buckling failure through two measures: strengthening the support and optimizing the stope layout direction. This study contributes to ensuring safe and efficient mining at Sishanling iron mine and provides a reference for failure analysis and the prevention of similar layered rock mass engineering.

Key words: deep roadway, thinly layered surrounding rock, buckling failure, mechanical mechanism

中图分类号: TD 315
[1] 刘小虎, 姚直书, 程桦, 查文华, 吴捷豪, . 深井穿尖交岔点突变失稳机制分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 521-531.
[2] 雷勇, 李鹏甲, 刘泽宇, 李金朝, 胡伟. 岩溶区穿越溶洞基桩屈曲临界荷载计算方法 与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3347-3356.
[3] 刘成禹, 罗洪林, 李红军, 张向向, . 岩脉型岩爆的形成机制及控制技术—— 以乌兹别克斯坦卡姆奇克隧道为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1413-1423.
[4] 姚玉文, 刘方成, 补国斌, 景立平, . 橡胶砂弹性动力学参数的弯曲-伸缩元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[5] 刘泉声, 邓鹏海, 毕晨, 李伟伟, 刘军, . 深部巷道软弱围岩破裂碎胀过程及锚喷-注浆 加固FDEM数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4065-4083.
[6] 邹宗兴 ,唐辉明 ,熊承仁 ,刘 晓 ,倪卫达 ,葛云峰,. 高速岩质滑坡启动弹冲加速机制及弹冲速度计算 ——以武隆县鸡尾山滑坡为例[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 2004-2012.
[7] 吴 永 ,何思明 ,裴向军 ,李新坡 . 震后沟道泥石流启动条件——松散堆积体雨中失稳的水力学机制分析[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3043-3050.
[8] 肖同强 ,柏建彪 ,王襄禹 ,陈 勇 ,于 洋. 深部大断面厚顶煤巷道围岩稳定原理及控制[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1874-1880.
[9] 钱岳红 王德荣 李 杰 陈文涛. 掌子面前支撑压力带岩层变形破坏机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3058-3064.
[10] 左宇军 ,马春德 ,朱万成 ,李术才 ,宫凤强 ,陈春春. 动力扰动下深部开挖洞室围岩分层断裂破坏机制模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2929-2936.
[11] 曾庆义,杨晓阳,杨昌亚. 扩大头锚杆的力学机制和计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1359-1367.
[12] 黄 锋. 隧道岩爆的动力学机理及其控制的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1139-1142.
[13] 李利平,李术才,张庆松. 岩溶地区隧道裂隙水突出力学机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 523-528.
[14] 秦建敏,张洪武. 颗粒材料的微观临界状态理论模型[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3697-3703.
[15] 刘泉声,卢兴利. 煤矿深部巷道破裂围岩非线性大变形及支护对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3273-3279.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!