岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3201-3213.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0096

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DIC技术的砂土中圆形锚板上拔土体 变形特性试验研究

史旦达1,毛逸瑶1,杨勇1,原媛1,郝冬雪2   

  1. 1. 上海海事大学 海洋科学与工程学院,上海 201306;2. 东北电力大学 建筑工程学院,吉林 吉林 132012
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-05 修回日期:2020-06-08 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:史旦达,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事宏细观岩土力学、海洋岩土力学等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41772273,No. 11802172)

Experimental study on the deformation characteristics of soils around uplift circular plate anchors using digital image correlation technology

SHI Dan-da1, MAO Yi-yao1, YANG Yong1, YUAN Yuan1, HAO Dong-xue2   

  1. 1. College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin, Jilin 132012, China
  • Received:2020-02-05 Revised:2020-06-08 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772273, 11802172).

摘要: 针对福建标准砂,采用非接触式数字图像相关技术(digital image correlation, DIC),通过一系列室内模型试验研究了圆形锚板上拔时锚周土体的变形特性,重点分析了盘径、埋深比和砂土相对密实度的影响。试验结果表明,随着盘径的增加,同一埋深比条件下,上拔力峰值和出现上拔力峰值时的位移水平均明显增大,而上拔承载力系数N?则随着盘径的增加而减小,但盘径变化不影响上拔时锚周土体位移影响区的形状,且以上规律不受砂土相对密实度变化的影响。对于密砂,锚周土体位移影响区形状随着埋深比的增加由倒梯形向U字形发展,土体剪切破坏面为沿锚板边缘向外侧斜上方演进的直线型破坏面,且与竖直方向的夹角约为1/4?p(?p为土的峰值摩擦角);随着锚板的上拔,锚板上方土体出现较为明显的体积膨胀。对于松砂,随着埋深比的增加,锚周土体位移影响区形状由延伸至土体表面的矩形向内置于土体的贝壳形发展;浅埋时,土体剪切破坏面沿锚板边缘垂直向土体表面开展;深埋时,土体剪切破坏面沿锚板边缘向内侧斜上方发展,与水平方向的夹角约为45°+1/2?p。无论何种埋深比,锚板正上方均观测到小范围的体积膨胀区,其上为体积收缩区,且随着埋深比的增加体积收缩量逐渐增加。

关键词: 数字图像相关技术, 圆形锚板, 土体变形, 上拔承载力系数

Abstract: A series of indoor model tests was conducted to study the sand deformation characteristics around uplift circular plate anchors using digital image correlation technology, with emphasis on the effects of plate diameter, embedment ratio and relative density of sand. The experimental results show that when a same embedment ratio is reached, the peak uplift force and the displacement for the appearance of peak uplift force both increase with increasing plate diameter, yet the uplift bearing capacity coefficient decreases as plate diameter increases. The shape of influence zone concerning soil deformation is not affected by the variation of plate diameter, and this regularity is independent of soil density. For the dense sand case, as embedment ratio increases, the shape of influence zone evolves from a reversed trapezoid to a U shape, and a linear shear failure surface can be captured with the inclination angle of 1/4?p to the vertical, where ?p is the peak friction angle of soil. The surrounded soil exhibits a significant volume expansion due to the uplift of plate anchor in dense sand. For the loose sand case, as embedment ratio increases, the shape of influence zone gradually develops from a rectangle extended into soil surface, to a shell shape embedded within the soil. As to a shallow anchor in loose sand, the shear failure surface of soil perpendicularly progresses from the edge of anchor plate to soil surface. When a deep anchor in loose sand is discussed, an inside oblique shear failure surface can be observed and the inclination angle to the horizontal is about 45°+1/2?p. Irrespective of the embedment ratio, due to the uplift of plate anchor, a small volume expansion zone is observed above the anchor plate, upon which is a large volume contraction zone with the value of volume contraction increasing with the increase of anchor’s embedment ratio.

Key words: digital image correlation technology, circular plate anchor, soil deformation, uplift bearing capacity coefficient

中图分类号: TU 473.1
[1] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[2] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[3] 张红日, 杨济铭, 徐永福, 肖杰, 韩仲, 汪磊, 林宇亮, . 基于数字图像相关技术的膨胀土三维裂隙扩展特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 309-323.
[4] 季慧, 彭宇, 吴则祥, 涂冬媚, . 砂土中吸力筒基础抗拔数值模拟研究: 系泊深度效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2187-2194.
[5] 彭阳, 高永涛, 王文林, 甫尔卡特, 温建敏, 周喻, . 单侧限压缩煤岩组合体的破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 387-398.
[6] 高志傲, 孔令伟, 王双娇, 刘炳恒, 芦剑锋, . 平面应变条件下不同裂隙方向原状膨胀土变形破坏性状与剪切带演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2495-2508.
[7] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[8] 张昕, 董浩, 徐迎迎, 王柳月, . 竖向循环荷载作用下砂土中单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 673-684.
[9] 郭凯丰, 张仪萍. 双层地基中气体聚集与土体变形机制的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 99-108.
[10] 王心博, 王路君, 朱斌, 王鹏, 袁思敏, 陈云敏, . 水合物储层伺服降压开采模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2360-2370.
[11] 彭守建, 张倩文, 许江, 陈奕安, 陈灿灿, 曹琦, 饶豪魁, . 基于三维数字图像相关技术的砂岩渗流-应力 耦合变形局部化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1197-1206.
[12] 史旦达, 俞快, 毛逸瑶, 原媛, 郝冬雪, 胡伟, . 松砂中双叶片螺旋锚上拔承载 及土体变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3059-3072.
[13] 孙文进, 金爱兵, 王树亮, 赵怡晴, 韦立昌, 贾玉春, . 基于DIC的高温砂岩劈裂力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 511-518.
[14] 徐浩淳, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 韦立昌, . 高温层理砂岩劈裂力学特性及裂隙演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3069-3078.
[15] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!