岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3491-3499.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0607

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

中美欧自平衡静载试验标准若干问题探讨

朱建民1,殷开成2,龚维明3,谢礼飞1   

  1. 1. 南京东大自平衡桩基检测有限公司,江苏 南京 210018;2. 南京赛宝液压设备有限公司,江苏 南京 211164; 3. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-13 修回日期:2020-06-23 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-07
  • 作者简介:朱建民,男,1980年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事桩与深基础方面的研究

Discussion about several issues of bi-directional load testing in Chinese, American and European standards

ZHU Jian-min1, YIN Kai-cheng2, GONG Wei-ming3, XIE Li-fei1   

  1. 1. Nanjing Dongda Bi-directional Pile Test Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 210018, China; 2. Nanjing Saibao Hydraulic Equipment Co., Ltd., Nanjing, Jiangsu 211164, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2020-05-13 Revised:2020-06-23 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-07

摘要: 针对我国标准JGJ/T 403-2017、美国标准ASTM D8169/D8169M-18、欧洲标准ISO 22477-1:2018中自平衡静载试验标准的差异之处,对其加载系统、位移量测系统、位移稳定标准、终止加载条件等内容进行了比较探讨。美欧标准对荷载箱液压管布置的要求与我国显著不同。我国位移稳定标准明显严于欧美。对于桩身完整性,声波透射法等检出的荷载箱处异常不应直接判为桩身缺陷。通过环带式荷载箱的模型试验,证实了桩身断开面位置在液压缸缸套下缘、荷载箱上下桩身混凝土不会局部压碎。通过双荷载箱试桩现场测试,得出了桩身断开面土体填充率为50%~60%。给出了试验后荷载箱处注浆的建议,工程桩按要求注浆后可以正常使用。

关键词: 静载试验, 自平衡法, 荷载箱, 桩身完整性, 桩身断开面, 荷载箱处注浆

Abstract: There are many differences in the standards of bi-directional load testing, among Chinese (JGJ/T 403-2017), American (ASTM D8169/D8169M-18), and European (ISO 22477-1:2018) standards, on the loading system, the displacement measuring system, the displacement convergence criterion, and the loading termination conditions. The layout of hydraulic tubing in the embedded jack in the American and European standards are significantly different from the Chinese standard. The displacement convergence criterion of the Chinese standard is more rigorous than the American and European standards. For pile integrity testing, the anomaly near the embedded jack shall not be directly judged as defect. Model testing of annulus embedded jacks were carried out. It shows that the position of the fracture surface in the tested pile is at the lower edge of the cylinder, and the concrete near the embedded jack would not be locally crushed. Field testing of double layer embedded jacks were conducted. It reveals that the soil filling rate of the fracture surface in the test pile is 50%-60%. Grouting process of the embedded jack after-testing is suggested. When grouting as required, the working pile can be used normally.

Key words: static load testing, bi-directional load testing, embedded jack, pile integrity, pile fracture surface, embedded jack grouting

中图分类号: TU 473.1
[1] 谢宏丽, 周志军, 任玉波, 田叶青, 范经灿. 大直径预应力钢筋混凝土管桩群桩的水平承载性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2573-2585.
[2] 王军, 金天, 秦伟, 张峰, 蔡瑛, . 不均匀卵石持力层桩端后注浆效果试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1321-1333.
[3] 凌造, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 李波, 苏定立, . 非挤土嵌岩预应力高强度混凝土管桩的桩端承载性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 97-107.
[4] 银吉超, 白晓宇, 张亚妹, 闫楠, 王永洪, 张明义, . 一种模拟原状泥岩动力打桩与静载试验 装置的研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 698-710.
[5] 秦伟, 戴国亮, 马李志, 裴铭海, 王磊, 朱光耀, 高博, . 珊瑚礁地层中PHC桩原位静载试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 381-389.
[6] 王正振,龚维明,戴国亮,王晓阳,李亮亮,肖 刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
[7] 李小娟,戴国亮,龚维明,徐文希,王 磊 , . 砂性土中自平衡试验转换系数取值研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 659-668.
[8] 周佳锦,王奎华,龚晓南,张日红,严天龙,. 静钻根植竹节桩桩端承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2603-2609.
[9] 郭 楠 ,陈正汉 ,黄雪峰 ,杨校辉,. 软岩地基中大直径布袋桩抗拔试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 603-609.
[10] 苏世定,杨仲轩,郭望波. 黏土中打入桩竖向承载力计算方法效果评价[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 389-393.
[11] 秦 月,孟庆山,汪 稔,朱长歧. 钙质砂地基单桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1714-1720.
[12] 徐 燕 ,张静娴 ,何 晶 ,刁 钰 . 应用植筋锚固技术进行基桩静载试验的可行性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 309-314.
[13] 柯 洪 ,吴 翔 ,王继华 ,曾云川 ,赵春宏 ,冯庆高. 天津厚地层超长钻孔灌注桩单桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2821-2826.
[14] 陈 祥,孙进忠,蔡新滨. 基桩水平静载试验及内力和变形分析[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 753-759.
[15] 龚维明,于清泉,戴国亮. 越南大翁桥桩基承载性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 558-562.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!