岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3540-3552.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0214

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲击损伤砂岩动静组合加载力学特性研究

闻磊1,梁旭黎3,冯文杰1,王伟2,王亮2,常江芳1,袁维2   

  1. 1. 石家庄铁道大学 工程力学系,河北 石家庄 050043;2. 石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院,河北 石家庄 050043; 3. 河北地质大学 勘查技术与工程学院,河北 石家庄 050031
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 冯文杰,男,1967年生,博士,教授、博士生导师,主要从事断裂力学方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:wjfeng9999@126.com E-mail:WL0921@126.com
  • 作者简介:闻磊,男,1983年生,博士,副教授、硕士生导师,主要从事岩石力学方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金(No. E2018210066);国家博士后面上基金(No. 2018M631758);国家自然科学基金(No. 51979170)

An investigation of the mechanical properties of sandstone under coupled static and dynamic loading

WEN Lei1, LIANG Xu-li3, FENG Wen-jie1, WANG Wei2, WANG Liang2, CHANG Jiang-fang1, YUAN Wei2   

  1. 1. Mechanics Engineering Department, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhang, Hebei 050043, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, Shijiazhang, Hebei 050043, China; 3. School of Exploration Technology and Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (E2018210066), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2018M631758) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979170).

摘要: 利用霍布金森压杆试验装置对灰砂岩试样进行预加静载的循环冲击,使试样产生初始损伤,并分析此过程中试样的损伤演化规律。使用能够施加轴压的霍布金森压杆进行预损伤试样动静组合加载试验,获得试样破坏模式、动态应力-应变关系等指标。基于应变等价原理分析预损伤试样动静组合加载条件下的总损伤变量,建立相应的损伤演化方程及损伤本构关系,并与完整试样进行对比。研究结果表明:循环冲击过程中试样损伤变量分为快速上升、低速发展、高速发展3个阶段,预加轴压越大低速发展阶段损伤变量平均值越小;相同动静组合加载条件下预损伤试样动态强度较小,完整试样应变率增强效应更加显著;循环冲击预损伤变量 、预加静载损伤变量 对于应力-应变关系的影响是较为复杂的, 、 值之和可能为负值;建立的本构关系与试验曲线具有较好的一致性,得到的总损伤变量曲线不仅能够解释试样宏观破坏与细观损伤过程的一致性,并且能够反映循环冲击和预加静载两种因素对岩石总损伤发展的非线性影响。

关键词: 损伤变量, 循环冲击, 动静组合加载, 本构关系

Abstract: Through the application of SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) test, this research firstly analyzed the law of damage under the cyclical impact on grey sandstone samples with the condition of static load. After that, to obtain the sample failure mode and speculate the relationship between dynamic stress and strain, the static-dynamic loading experiments on pre-damaged rock samples were also performed. Finally, based on the principle of strain equivalence, the total damage variable under the condition of static-dynamic loading was analyzed to derive the damage evolution equation to explain the relation of damage constitutive. Based on above tests, the research suggests: (1) the damage variable of rock sample can be divided into three stages during the process of cyclical impact, which are rapid increase, low-speed development and high-speed development, meanwhile, a higher axial pressure will lead to a lower damage variable in the stage of low-speed development; (2) compared with pre-damaged sample, the effect of strain rate enhancement on intact samples is more significant under the same condition; (3) the joint impact of pre-damaged variable ( ) and static-load damage variable ( ) might be negative, which therefore explained the fact that the dynamic strength increases with the static pressure under the condition of static-dynamic loading; (4) the constructed constitutive relation is also in perfect agreement with the curve of test value, which can in turn show a consistency between the macro- and micro- damage of the rock and then reflect the nonlinear influence of cyclical impact and static loading on total damage development.

Key words: split Hopkinson pressure bar test, damage variable, cyclical impact, static-dynamic loading experiments, constitutive relation

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 李晓照, 闫怀蔚, 李连杰, 戚承志. 预拉脆性岩石动态直接拉伸断裂的宏细观力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 217-227.
[2] 张瑨, 李书恒, 朱其志, 石玲玲, 邵建富, . 基于深度学习的岩石短长期本构模型及灰砂岩变形预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 289-302.
[3] 王磊, 陈礼鹏, 刘怀谦, 朱传奇, 李少波, 范浩, 张帅, 王安铖, . 不同初始瓦斯压力下煤体动力学特性及其劣化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 144-158.
[4] 范杰, 朱星, 胡桔维, 唐垚, 贺春蕾, . 基于3D-DIC的砂岩裂纹扩展及损伤监测试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1009-1019.
[5] 原鹏博, 朱磊, 钟秀梅, 董兰凤, 谌文武, . 酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固遗址土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3385-3392.
[6] 程坦, 郭保华, 孙杰豪, 田世轩, 孙崇轩, 陈岩, . 非规则砂岩节理剪切变形本构关系试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 51-64.
[7] 许健, 武智鹏, 陈辉, . 干湿循环效应下玄武岩纤维加筋黄土 三轴剪切力学行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 28-36.
[8] 李地元, 高飞红, 刘 濛, 马金银. 动静组合加载下含孔洞层状砂岩破坏机制探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2127-2140.
[9] 余莉, 彭海旺, 李国伟, 张钰, 韩子豪, 祝瀚政. 花岗岩高温−水冷循环作用下的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1025-1035.
[10] 李波波, 王忠晖, 任崇鸿, 张尧, 许江, 李建华, . 水-力耦合下煤岩力学特性及损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 315-323.
[11] 郝延周, 王铁行, 程磊, 金鑫, . 考虑干湿循环影响的压实黄土结构性本构关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2977-2986.
[12] 王伟, 梁渲钰, 张明涛, 贾泽钰, 张思怡, 王奇智, . 动静组合加载下砂岩破坏机制 及裂纹密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2647-2658.
[13] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[14] 王震, 朱珍德, 陈会官, 朱姝, . 冻融作用下岩石力-热-水耦合本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2608-2616.
[15] 王 宇, 艾 芊, 李建林, 邓华锋, . 考虑不同影响因素的砂岩损伤特征 及其卸荷破坏细观特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1341-1350.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!