岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 3651-3662.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0175

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于预应力锚和自应力注的深部裂隙 岩体锚注加固机制研究

张进鹏1, 2,刘立民2,刘传孝1,孙东玲3,邵军3,李扬2   

  1. 1. 山东农业大学 水利土木工程学院,山东 泰安 271018;2. 山东科技大学 能源与矿业工程学院,山东 青岛 266590; 3. 中煤科工集团重庆研究院有限公司,重庆 400037
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-09 修回日期:2020-04-13 出版日期:2020-11-11 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 刘立民,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事地下工程围岩控制与地表沉陷规律研究。E-mail:llmsdust@163.com E-mail:zjpsdust@126.com
  • 作者简介:张进鹏,男,1992年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩体力学与注浆加固研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51974358);山东省重点研发基金项目(No. 2018GSF116006)。

Research on mechanism of bolt-grouting reinforcement for deep fractured rock mass based on prestressed anchor and self-stress grouting

ZHANG Jin-peng1, 2, LIU Li-min2, LIU Chuan-xiao1, SUN Dong-ling3, SHAO Jun3, LI Yang2   

  1. 1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, Shandong 271018, China; 2. College of Energy and Mining Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, Shandong 266590, China; 3. China Coal Technology Engineering Group Chongqing Research Institute, Chongqing 400037, China
  • Received:2020-01-09 Revised:2020-04-13 Online:2020-11-11 Published:2020-12-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51604164) and Shandong Province Key R&D Plan (2018GSF116006).

摘要: 针对深部裂隙岩体水泥基注浆加固后由于材料自收缩造成浆岩界面松弛及充填空隙的问题,提出了基于预应力锚和自应力注的裂隙岩体锚注加固方法。建立了单裂隙岩体的自应力浆液加固模型和新型预应力锚注加固模型,通过物理试验研究普通锚注和新型预应力锚注加固裂隙砂岩试样的力学特征,通过工程应用验证了新型预应力锚注加固的有效性。结果表明:在一定范围内浆液膨胀约束应力越大,对裂隙岩体的加固作用越强,浆液膨胀约束应力和锚杆轴向应力对裂隙岩体最大主应力的提高呈叠加关系;新型预应力锚注加固砂岩的峰值强度比普通锚注加固砂岩提高了10%以上,其峰值应变略低于普通锚注加固砂岩,新型预应力锚注砂岩的弹性变形阶段缩短,加固效果增强;锚网索支护、U36型钢支架支护、普通锚注支护均未能有效控制的变电所巷道围岩采用新型预应力锚注加固后,巷道表面围岩最大位移为83 mm,控制效果较好。

关键词: 裂隙岩体, 预应力锚, 自应力浆液, 锚注加固, 围岩控制

Abstract: To solve the problem of grout-rock interface relaxation due to self-shrinkage of cement-based material grouting in deep fractured rock masses, a bolt-grouting reinforcement method for deep fractured rock masses based on prestressed anchor and self-stress grouting was proposed. A self-stressed grouting reinforcement model and a new prestressed bolt-grouting reinforcement model for a single fractured rock mass were established. The mechanical characteristics of fractured sandstone specimens with ordinary and new bolt-grouting reinforcement were studied in physical experiments. The effectiveness of the new prestressed bolt-grouting reinforced rock mass was verified in engineering applications. Results showed that within a certain range, the greater the expansion restraint stress of the slurry stone is, the stronger the reinforcement effect on the fractured rock mass is. The expansion restraint stress of the slurry stone and the axial stress of bolt both contributed to the increase of the maximum principal stress of the fractured rock mass. The peak strength of the new prestressed bolt-grouting reinforced sandstone was 10% higher than that of the ordinary bolt-grouting reinforced sandstone. Its peak strain was slightly lower than that of the ordinary bolt-grouting reinforced sandstone. Moreover, the elastic deformation stage of the new prestressed anchor-grouting reinforced sandstone was shortened, and its reinforcement effect was enhanced. The surrounding rock of the substation roadway, which could not be well controlled by anchor-net support, U36 steel support or ordinary bolt-grouting reinforcement, was effectively controlled by new prestressed bolt-grouting reinforcement, and the maximum displacement of the surrounding rock on the roadway surface was 83 mm.

Key words: fractured rock mass, prestressed anchor, self-stressed slurry, bolt-grouting reinforcement, surrounding rock control

中图分类号: TU 757
[1] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[2] 唐劲舟, 唐文豪, 杨科, 赵延林, 刘钦节, 段敏克, 谭哲, . 循环荷载作用下含倾斜单裂隙砂岩力学响应特征及渗流演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 199-212.
[3] 邓东平, 杨春会, 谢志军, . 非线性M-C强度准则下预应力锚索加固边坡时效稳定性分析M-P法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1051-1066.
[4] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[5] 刘洪涛, 韩子俊, 刘勤裕, 陈子晗, 韩洲, 张红凯, 杨永松. 巷道蝶形破坏强度准则低敏感性研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 117-130.
[6] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[7] 周晓敏, 马文著, 张松, 宋宜祥, 刘勇, 和晓楠, . 渗流条件下隧道锚注复合围岩体的解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 206-220.
[8] 宋硕, 任富强, 常来山, . 含预应力锚杆煤岩组合体破坏及声发射特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 449-460.
[9] 刘东东, 魏立新, 徐国元, 项彦勇, . 基于裂隙连续方法的三维裂隙岩体渗流传热数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2143-2150.
[10] 王川, 冷先伦, 张占荣, 杨闯, 陈健, . 基于裂隙扩展的多级岩质边坡 开挖卸荷破坏路径分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1190-1203.
[11] 贾蓬, 王晓帅, 王德超. 饱水裂隙岩石冻融变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 345-354.
[12] 程雷, 肖瑶, 邓华锋, 熊雨, 彭萌, 支永艳, 李文华, . 一株本源产脲酶细菌的分离培养及其在裂隙 岩体加固中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 307-314.
[13] 康永水, 耿志, 刘泉声, 刘滨, 朱元广, . 我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2035-2059.
[14] 蒋中明, 肖喆臻, 唐栋, 何国富, 许卫, . 基于裂隙渗流效应的水封油库涌水量预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1041-1047.
[15] 吴祥业, 王婧雅, 陈世江, 张玉江, 卜庆为, . 重复采动巷道塑性区调控原理与稳定控制[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 205-217.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!