岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3851-3861.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0311

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥石流冲击弧形拦挡坝动力响应研究

王东坡,张小梅   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-18 修回日期:2020-07-11 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 作者简介:王东坡,男,1984年生,博士,博士后,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质灾害冲击动力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41877266,No.41790433);四川省杰出青年科技人才项目(No.2020JDJQ0044);地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室自主研究课题(SKLGP2019Z013,SKLGP2019K011)。

Study on dynamic response of debris flow impact arc-shaped dam

WANG Dong-po, ZHANG Xiao-mei   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2020-03-18 Revised:2020-07-11 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41877266, 41790433), the Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Sichuan Province(2020JDJQ0044) and the State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection Independent Research Project(SKLGP2019Z013, SKLGP2019K011).

摘要: 泥石流冲击过程中,坝基位置处承受了较大冲击力,易引起该位置出现应力集中而导致局部冲击破坏。为此,将竖向拦挡坝结构优化为弧形拦挡坝,并基于动量及能量守恒开展泥石流冲击弧形拦挡坝理论计算研究,推导泥石流对弧形拦挡坝的冲击力及爬升高度计算公式。为验证理论公式的正确性,进一步开展泥石流冲击弧形拦挡坝物理模型试验。研究结果表明:物理模型试验结果与所推导的理论公式计算结果具有较高的拟合度,该理论公式可适用于泥石流对弧形拦挡坝的冲击计算;泥石流流速、冲击力、爬升高度与泥石流沟道纵坡坡度呈正相关关系;冲击力及爬升高度主要受弗洛德数Fr、泥石流沟道纵坡坡度?、拦挡坝弧形半径R控制,并与Fr呈二次方正相关,与泥石流沟道纵坡坡度??的余弦值成反比;与竖向型拦挡坝结构相比,弧形拦挡坝结构在爬升高度上无显著影响,然而可较大程度降低泥石流对坝体的法向冲击力,局部结构增强也使得坝体结构强度得到提升。该研究可为泥石流拦挡坝工程的结构设计提供理论及技术支持。

关键词: 泥石流, 弧形拦挡坝, 冲击力, 爬升高度

Abstract: Dam foundation is subjected to a larger impact force when debris flow runs up, causing stress concentration and local impact failure. To address this problem, in this study the vertical structures are optimized into arc-shaped dams. Based on the principle of momentum and energy conservation, the theoretical calculations of the impact process of debris flow and arc-shaped dam are carried out, and the formulas of impact force and maximum run-up height of debris flow are deduced. The theoretical formulas are verified through a series of physical model tests of debris flow impact arc-shaped dam. The results show that the results of the physical model are highly consistent with those of the theoretical calculations, indicating that the proposed theoretical formulas are applicable in the calculation of the impact of debris flow on arc-shaped dam. The debris velocity, impact force and the maximum run-up height are proportional to the flume slope of debris flow. The impact force and the maximum run-up height are mainly controlled by Froude number(Fr), flume slope(?), and arc-shaped radius(R). Both the impact force and the maximum run-up height have quadratic relationships with the Froude number, and are inversely proportional to the cosine of the flume slope. Compared with the rigid vertical structures, the arc-shaped dams have no signicicant influence on the maximum run-up height, but it can reduce the normal impact force on the dam considerably, and the structure strength can also be enhanced by the strengthening of local structure. This study provides a theoretical and technical support for the dam structure design.

Key words: debris flow, arc-shaped dam, impact force, maximum run-up height

中图分类号: TU42
[1] 马书文, 卢谅, 王宗建, 王经天, 李蓝星, . 落石冲击下预应力加筋土路堤变形及荷载传递机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 799-809.
[2] 陈泰江, 向欣, 章广成, . 基于线黏弹性接触的落石冲击地面参量理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2410-2420.
[3] 许江, 程亮, 魏仁忠, 彭守建, 周斌, 杨海林, . T型巷道中突出煤−瓦斯两相流动力学试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1423-1433.
[4] 王东坡, 赵军, 张小梅, 杨鑫, . 开口柔性防护网调控泥石流性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1237-1248.
[5] 沈志平, 刘慧, 付君宜, 孙秀东. 力量速度法和力量平方法量测动力 触探锤击能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3127-3134.
[6] 陈泰江, 章广成, 向欣, . 落石冲击混凝土棚洞力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 277-285.
[7] 梁恒, 李吉林, 刘发明, 张伦, 付刚, 李明清, 何思明, . 基于光滑粒子流体动力学方法的 泥石流冲击桥墩试验模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1473-1484.
[8] 安笑, 潘华利, 欧国强, 孔玲, 李炳志, . 恒定渗流作用泥石流碎屑物质起动判别模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 115-122.
[9] 叶阳, 曾亚武, 杜欣, 孙翰卿, 陈曦, . 球形砾石碰撞损伤破碎三维离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 368-378.
[10] 程亮, 许江, 周斌, 彭守建, 闫发志, 杨孝波, 杨文健. 不同瓦斯压力对煤与瓦斯突出两相流 传播规律的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2619-2626.
[11] 韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[12] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[13] 王友彪, 姚昌荣, 刘赛智, 李亚东, 张 迅. 泥石流对桥墩冲击力的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[14] 肖思友, 苏立君, 姜元俊, 李丞, 刘振宇, . 坡度对碎屑流冲击立式拦挡墙力学特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4341-4351.
[15] 李兆华,胡 杰,冯吉利,龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!