岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3929-3938.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0391

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

疏浚淤泥化学絮凝−真空预压深度脱水效果评价

王东星1, 2,唐弈锴1,伍林峰1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学 土木建筑工程学院 岩土与结构工程安全湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072; 2. 武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-04 修回日期:2020-05-17 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 作者简介:王东星,男,1984年生,博士(后),副教授,博士生导师,主要从事淤/污泥固化和软基处理等环境岩土工程教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51879202,No.52079098)

Evaluation on deep dewatering performance of dredged sludge treated by chemical flocculation-vacuum preloading

WANG Dong-xing1, 2, TANG Yi-kai1, WU Lin-feng1   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Safety for Geotechnical and Structural Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2020-04-04 Revised:2020-05-17 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51879202, 52079098).

摘要: 为实现疏浚淤泥高效快速脱水减容,选取化学絮凝和真空预压相结合的脱水技术,利用自制真空预压抽滤装置对5种类型絮凝剂调理淤泥进行系列室内脱水试验,通过上清液高度、泥水分界面高度、沉降速率、底泥含水率等指标,综合评价疏浚淤泥沉降过程与深度脱水效果。结果表明:5种絮凝剂对应最优添加量分别为Ca(OH)2(1 500 mg/L)、PAFSI(200 mg/L)、PAC(200 mg/L)、HCA(50 mg/L)、APAM(500 mg/L);与原始淤泥自然沉降过程相比(底泥高度17.14 cm、含水率96.8%),真空预压可实现絮凝调理淤泥脱水减容、底泥平均含水率降至53.5%,使底泥体积进一步压缩20.48%~36.99%;真空预压作用下,絮凝调理淤泥在50 min内达到沉降速率峰值,前120 min内淤泥絮凝效果明显、泥水分离程度占据主导;与原始淤泥真空预压对比,絮凝?真空预压大幅提升淤泥沉降速率、有效缩短峰值对应沉降时间,最优絮凝剂(APAM)底泥沉降速率峰值、淤泥总高度沉降速率峰值对应时间点缩短87.5%和83.33%,峰值速率分别增加3.56倍、5.18倍;添加适量絮凝剂能有效改善淤泥脱水性能,增大泥粒尺寸、防堵促排,加速疏浚淤泥沉降与泥水分离效率。化学絮凝?真空抽滤技术有利于实现疏浚淤泥减量化,显著缩短工期、加快施工进度、减少堆积占地,具有显著的工程应用价值。

关键词: 淤泥, 絮凝剂, 真空预压, 泥水分离, 沉降速率, 底泥含水率

Abstract: The combined technology of chemical flocculation and vacuum preloading was proposed to achieve efficient and rapid dewatering of dredged sludge. Five representative flocculants were selected to facilitate the dewatering process using a self-made vacuum preloading filter device. The sedimentation and deep dewatering process of dredged sludge were comprehensively evaluated using a set of designed parameters, including supernatant height, mud-water interface height, settling rate and water content of bottom sludge. The experimental results indicate that the optimal amount of flocculants is 1 500 mg/L for Ca(OH)2, 200 mg/L for PAFSI, 200 mg/L for PAC, 50 mg/L for HCA and 500 mg/L for APAM, respectively. Compared with natural sedimentation process (17.14 cm in height and 96.8% of water content of bottom sludge), the effect of vacuum preloading can accelerate the consolidation and reduce effectively the sludge volume, i.e. the water content of bottom sludge decreases from 96.8% to 53.5% and the volume is compressed further by 20.48%?36.99%. The settling rate of sludge after vacuum preloading reaches its peak within 50 min, and the effect of flocculants associated with the mud-water separation degree plays a dominated role within 120 min. Compared with the original sludge subjected to vacuum preloading, the combination of flocculation-vacuum preloading significantly improves the settling rate of sludge and effectively shortens the required time to reach the peak settling rate. For the optimal flocculant (APAM), the time needed to reach the peak settling rate of bottom sludge and the peak settling rate calculated from total height of sludge are shortened by 87.5% and 83.33%, and the peak settling rate is increased by 3.56 and 5.18 times, respectively. The combined technology of chemical flocculation and vacuum preloading can effectively improve the dewatering performance of flocculated sludge, increase the particle size to prevent blockage, accelerate drainage, promote the sludge sedimentation and improve the mud-water separation efficiency. The combined technique of flocculation-vacuum preloading, contributing to decrease sludge volume, shorten construction period, speed up construction progress and reduce the floor area, can play an important role if it is applied to engineering practice.

Key words: sludge, flocculants, vacuum preloading, mud-water separation, settling rate, water content of bottom sludge

中图分类号: TU447
[1] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[2] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[4] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[5] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[6] 杨少朋, 杨爱武, 许福军, . 改性纤维排水板真空预压加固吹填软土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 789-797.
[7] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[8] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[9] 崔允亮, 潘方然, 高楥园, 金子原, . 真空预压淤堵区渗透系数的计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2085-2093.
[10] 刘景锦, 罗学思, 雷华阳, 郑刚, 罗昊鹏, . 等应变条件下增压式真空预压固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 809-821.
[11] 林小蔚, 侯豪, 刘环, 季浪, 谈正伟, 朱伟, . 清淤泥浆脱水-固化一体化工艺效果和机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 443-453.
[12] 韩爽, 谈云志, 杨舒涵, 明华军, 吴军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 膨胀珍珠岩调控固化淤泥物理-力学性能的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3324-3332.
[13] 龙开荃, 方祥位, 申春妮, 张熙晨, 王明明, . 复合型早强土壤固化剂固化淤泥强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 309-318.
[14] 王宽君, 沈侃敏, 汪明元, 王洪羽, 国振, . 基于孔压静力触探的杭州湾海域软黏土强度解译参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 521-532.
[15] 郎瑞卿, 裴璐熹, 孙立强, 周龙, 李恒. 新拌不同液限淤泥固化土流动性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2789-2797.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!