岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3957-3967.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0356

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

粗粒土边界面塑性模型及其积分算法

孙增春1,汪成贵1,刘汉龙1, 2, 3,尹振宇4,吴焕然1, 2, 3,肖 杨1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆 400045;3. 重庆大学 库区环境地质灾害防治国家地方联合工程研究中心,重庆 400045;4. 香港理工大学 土木与环境工程学系,香港
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 修回日期:2020-05-28 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-18
  • 通讯作者: 肖杨,男,1982年生,博士,教授,主要从事土体力学特性及本构模型方面的研究。E-mail: hhuxyanson@163.com E-mail:cqsunzcu@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙增春,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事粗粒土本构模型及数值计算方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51922024,No.51678094);重庆市自然科学基金(No.cstc2019jcyjjqX0014)

Bounding surface plasticity model for granular soil and its integration algorithm

SUN Zeng-chun1, WANG Cheng-gui1, LIU Han-long1, 2, 3, YIN Zhen-yu4, WU Huan-ran1,2,3, XIAO Yang1, 2, 3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Areas, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Revised:2020-05-28 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51922024, 51678094) and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (cstc2019jcyjjqX0014).

摘要: 粗粒土的强度、变形特性对土石坝、边坡和路基等工程的安全性与稳定性有着至关重要的影响。针对粗粒土在复杂应力状态下的强度和变形特性,在边界面塑性理论和临界状态理论框架下,通过引入状态参数和动态临界状态线建立了粗粒土状态相关边界面塑性模型。模型不仅能够模拟粗粒土的应变硬化和体积收缩行为,还能描述应变软化和体积膨胀特性。基于ABAQUS的二次开发平台,结合带误差控制的改进欧拉积分算法编写了边界面塑性模型的UMAT子程序。通过设置不同的应变增量步和误差容许值,对改进欧拉积分算法的精确性和收敛性进行了分析。对不同密实状态和围压下粗粒土三轴排水剪切试验进行了模拟,验证了带误差控制的改进欧拉积分算法应用于粗粒土边界面塑性模型的合理性,为进一步工程应用奠定了基础。

关键词: 粗粒土, 边界面, 状态相关, 改进欧拉积分算法, UMAT

Abstract: The strength and deformation behavior of granular soil have an important influence on the safety and stability of earth-rock dams, slopes and subgrade. For the strength and deformation behavior of granular soil under complex stress state, a state-dependent bounding surface plasticity model was established for granular soil by incorporating the state parameter and dynamic critical state line in the framework of the bounding surface plasticity theory and the critical state theory. The established model can not only predict the strain hardening and volumetric contraction, but also well describe the strain softening and volumetric expansion behaviors. Based on the secondary development platform of ABAQUS, the UMAT subroutine of the bounding surface plasticity model was developed by using the modified Euler integration algorithm with error control. The accuracy and convergence of the modified Euler integration algorithm were analyzed with different strain increments and integration error tolerance values. Finally, the rationality of the modified Euler integration algorithm with error control applied to the bounding surface plasticity model was verified by simulating the triaxial drained shear tests of granular soil under different densities and pressures, which laid a foundation for further engineering application.

Key words: granular soil, bounding surface, state-dependent, modified Euler integration algorithm, UMAT

中图分类号: TU431
[1] 徐卫卫, 谢遵党, 傅中志, 米占宽, . 粗粒土真三轴试验南水模型研究及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2559-2572.
[2] 张春顺, 林正鸿, 杨典森, 陈嘉瑞, . 考虑初始级配影响的粗粒土非线性弹性模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 750-760.
[3] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[4] 马双星, 沈超敏, 刘斯宏, 王行, 李健, 张梦瑶. 堆石料级配相关力学规律预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3462-3472.
[5] 蒋明杰, 李泽懿, 吉恩跃, 刘宇菠, 梅国雄, . 考虑级配影响的粗粒土−格栅最优网格尺寸试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2565-2572.
[6] 张丹, 邱子源, 金伟, 张梓航, 罗玉龙, . 粗粒土渗透及渗透变形试验缩尺方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 164-172.
[7] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[8] 汪明元, 孙吉主, 王勇, 杨洋, . 基于CPTu的状态相关边界面模型标定研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3280-3287.
[9] 康孝森, 廖红建, 黄强兵, 霍秉尧, . 结构性黄土的临界压力比及其边界面 塑性本构模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1469-1480.
[10] 陈洲泉, 陈湘生, 庞小朝, . 砂土临界状态模型的隐式积分算法 在有限元分析中实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2279-2286.
[11] 姜逢宇, 黄牧, 熊自明, 孙善政, . 基于平面网格求交算法的三维地质模型 边界面重构方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1724-1732.
[12] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[13] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[14] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[15] 董建勋, 刘海笑, 李 洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!