岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1146-1152.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1190

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

偏高岭土增强石灰-水泥固化淤泥的耐久性研究

谈云志1,柯睿1, 2,陈君廉1,吴军3,邓永锋3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 中国地质大学 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074; 3. 东南大学 交通学院,江苏 南京 211189
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-06 修回日期:2019-08-13 出版日期:2020-04-11 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 作者简介:谈云志,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事特殊土方面的教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51579137);湖北省优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(No.T201803);中央财政支持地方高校发展专项(2016)

Enhancing durability of lime-cement solidified sludge with metakaolin

TAN Yun-zhi1, KE Rui1, 2, CHEN Jun-lian1, WU Jun3, DENG Yong-feng3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 3. School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China
  • Received:2019-07-06 Revised:2019-08-13 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51579137), the Youth Innovation Team Project of Hubei Province (T201803) and the Special Program of Central Financial Ministry for Supporting Local College Development (2016).

摘要: 淤泥富含有机质,分解后产生腐殖酸,进而影响淤泥固化效果。仅掺入12%水泥固化淤泥,当标准养护期超过60 d,其强度不增反减。联合掺入3%石灰和12%水泥,固化淤泥的pH值持续180 d处于10.5以上;无侧限抗压强度由750 kPa(养护期28 d)提升到1 500 kPa(120 d),说明借助石灰营造强碱性环境,可以提高水泥固化淤泥的强度;但养护到180 d后,其强度又降到1 250 kPa;钙离子浓度变化规律表明,这是由于腐殖酸溶蚀水泥和石灰的水化胶结物所致。借助偏高岭土卓越的火山灰反应能力,掺入3.0%偏高岭土,提升石灰(3%)?水泥(12%)固化淤泥的耐久性,发现180 d养护期内,其强度始终处于增长趋势,究其原因是偏高岭土富含无定形硅、铝氧化物,具有快速捕获氢氧化钙溶液中钙离子的能力,形成稳定的胶结物,而且不易受腐殖酸的侵蚀作用,证明偏高岭土能够有效提升石灰?水泥固化淤泥长期强度。

关键词: 淤泥, 腐殖酸, 偏高岭土, 有机质含量, 耐久性

Abstract: Sludge is rich in organic matter, which would generate humic acid after decomposition. Humic acid will affect the reaction process and strength of cement-treated soil. The unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of sludge treated with 12% cement may decrease after 60 days curing. If adding both of lime (3%) and cement (12%) into sludge, the pH value of treated soils is higher than 10.5 after 180 days curing, and the UCS increases from 750 kPa (cured 28 d) to 1 500 kPa (cured 120 d), which indicates that lime can improve the UCS of treated sludge significantly through establishing suitable strong alkaline environment. However, the UCS of treated sludge reduces to 1 250 kPa after 180 days curing, which may ascribe to humic acid dissolving hydration products of lime and/or cement. The calcium ion concentration increases with the elapsing of curing period, which could explain the behavior of humic acid attacking to hydration products. Metakaolin contains lots of amorphous silicon and aluminum oxides, with the addition of 3% metakaolin into sludge based on mixing with lime (3%) and cement (12%), the UCS increases in the whole curing period (180 d). The results show that metakaolin can capture the calcium ion in short time and form stable cementitious materials in solidified soils. And these cementitious materials have strong anti-erosion capacity to humic acid effect. These above findings prove that metakaolin can improve the long-term performance of cement treated sludge.

Key words: sludge, humic acid, metakaolin, organic matter content, durability

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张兴文, 曹净, 雷舒羽, 李育红, 程芸, 张柠锐, . 富里酸环境对含腐殖酸水泥土结构及渗透性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 249-261.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[4] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[5] 雷舒羽, 曹净, 刘海明, 张兴文, 张柠锐. 工程碱性环境中泥炭土体结构性损伤试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2135-2146.
[6] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[7] 谈云志, 吴仙桥, 吴军, 明华军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 磷石膏基团粒调控固化淤泥的物理力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1667-1677.
[8] 曹净, 雷舒羽, 刘海明, 张兴文. 水泥水化碱性环境下腐殖酸溶蚀性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 437-448.
[9] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[10] 李爽, 李江山, 张平, 刘磊, 杜月林, 朱磊, 高腾飞, 陈亿军, . 垃圾腐殖土固化回填可行性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 84-94.
[11] 林小蔚, 侯豪, 刘环, 季浪, 谈正伟, 朱伟, . 清淤泥浆脱水-固化一体化工艺效果和机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 443-453.
[12] 韩爽, 谈云志, 杨舒涵, 明华军, 吴军, 王冲, 肖宇, . 膨胀珍珠岩调控固化淤泥物理-力学性能的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3324-3332.
[13] 王宽君, 沈侃敏, 汪明元, 王洪羽, 国振, . 基于孔压静力触探的杭州湾海域软黏土强度解译参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 521-532.
[14] 龙开荃, 方祥位, 申春妮, 张熙晨, 王明明, . 复合型早强土壤固化剂固化淤泥强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 309-318.
[15] 桂跃, 谢正鹏, 高玉峰, . 有机质对黏性土热传导系数的影响与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 154-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!