岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1483-1491.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1173

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合

谌文武1, 2,贾全全1,童艳梅1   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-04 修回日期:2019-09-10 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 作者简介:谌文武,男,1966年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程、岩土工程和文物保护工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技重大专项(No. 18ZD2FA001)

Measurement and curve fitting for soil-waterer characteristic curve of mural plaster at Mogao Grottoes

CHEN Wen-wu1, 2, JIA Quan-quan1, TONG Yan-mei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2019-07-04 Revised:2019-09-10 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Major Proiect of Science and Technology of Gansu Province (18ZD2FA001).

摘要: 壁画的病害对壁画的长期保存和日常维护造成了极大的威胁,水带动易溶盐的迁移是导致壁画病害最主要的原因之一。地仗层作为壁画最直接的载体,其土-水特性关乎着壁画病害的形成与发育。为了研究壁画地仗层的土-水特性,根据莫高窟壁画地仗的物质组成制作了模拟地仗,采用压力板法和蒸汽平衡法分别对模拟地仗进行土-水特性试验,获得了全吸力范围的壁画地仗的土-水特征曲线,并用Van Genuchten(VG)模型和Fredlund-Xing(FX)模型对土-水特征曲线进行拟合。试验结果表明:不同组分的模拟地仗试样的土-水特征曲线有所差异,粗泥层与细泥层土-水特征曲线形态上差异并不明显;同等吸力下粗泥层含水率高于细泥层,在高吸力段粗泥层具有突变性释水的特点;对高吸力段地仗试样土-水特征曲线变化趋势的分析表明,在日常维护中莫高窟洞窟内湿度不应高于58%,湿度宜保持稳定,不应有较大波动;综合全吸力段上的试验数据进行拟合可以获得精度较高的壁画地仗的土-水特征拟合曲线。

关键词: 莫高窟, 壁画地仗, 土-水特征曲线, 压力板法, 蒸汽平衡法, 全吸力段

Abstract: Mural plaster deterioration poses great threat to the long-term preservation and daily maintenance. The migration of soluble salts by moisture movement is one of the most important factors that causes mural plaster deterioration. The plaster plays an important role in supporting the murals. The soil-water characteristic of the mural plaster is related to the formation and development of mural deterioration. In order to study the soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC) of mural plaster in full suction range, laboratory reconstituted plasters were prepared by the same materials as the mural plaster in Mogao Grottoes, and the pressure plate test method and vapor equilibrium technique were employed. The SWCC test data was fitted by van Genuchten (VG) model and Fredlund Xing (FX) model. The SWCC of the reconstituted plaster samples with different compositions showed different characteristics, while the morphological differences between the coarse plaster and the fine plaster on the SWCC were not obvious. Under the same suction condition, the moisture content of the coarse plaster is higher than that of the fine plaster, and the coarse plaster has the characteristics of rapid release of moisture in the high suction range. By analyzing the trend of the SWCC in the high suction range, it is recommended that the humidity in the Mogao Grottoes should not exceed 58% in daily maintenance, and the humidity should be stable with no major fluctuations. Based on the experimental data in the full suction range, highly accurate SWCC can be obtained.

Key words: Mogao Grottoes, mural plaster, soil-water characteristic curve (SWCC), pressure plate method, vapor equilibrium technique, full suction range

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 张高翔, 刘艳, 刘志强, . 土-水特征曲线的动态效应试验及模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 178-186.
[2] 周凤玺, 赵文沧. 基于土−水特征曲线的非饱和冻土未冻水含量预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2719-2727.
[3] 叶云雪, 易博文, 刘小文, 吴珺华, 洪本根, . 脱湿路径下土体水分变化路径及体积变形对滤纸法测定土-水特征曲线的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2351-2361.
[4] 马田田, 于海文, 韦昌富, 伊盼盼, 姚传芹, . 物理化学效应对膨胀土收缩特性的影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(3): 697-704.
[5] 张思奇, 裴华富, 谭道远, 朱鸿鹄, . 单、双孔隙结构非饱和黏土孔隙分布变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 353-363.
[6] 张俊然, 宋陈雨, 姜彤, 王俪锦, 赵金玓, 熊潭清. 非饱和黄土高吸力下的水力力学特性及微观结构分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2229-2237.
[7] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[8] 牛庚, 朱晓凤, 李俊星, 吕梦缘, 安荔琪, 陈子晗, . 宽广吸力范围非饱和土剪切强度试验研究及其预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3349-3359.
[9] 栾纪元, 王冀鹏. 基于4D显微成像的非饱和颗粒土微观力学与渗流试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(11): 3252-3260.
[10] 李旭, 刘阿强, 刘丽, 刘艳, 吴永康. 全吸力范围内土-水特征曲线的快速测定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 299-306.
[11] 李明玉, 孙文静, 黄强, 孙德安, . 全吸力范围生物炭−黏土混合土的土−水特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2717-2725.
[12] 李跃, 徐卫亚, 易魁, 谢伟超, 张强, 孟庆祥, . 堆积体滑带土非饱和-饱和渗透特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1355-1362.
[13] 刘倩倩, 李舰, 蔡国庆, 李朋林, 李昕哲, . 全吸力范围的盐渍土持水特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 713-722.
[14] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[15] 陶高梁, 吴小康, 甘世朝, 肖衡林, 马 强, 罗晨晨, . 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1761-1770.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!