岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1560-1566.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1427

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

涂抹区重叠竖井地基固结特性研究

李红坡1, 2, 3,梅国雄1, 2, 3,肖涛1, 2, 3,陈征4   

  1. 1. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004;2. 广西大学 广西防灾减灾与工程安全重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 广西大学 土木工程学院,广西 南宁 530004;4.武汉大学 水工岩石力学教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-19 修回日期:2019-09-12 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 陈征,男,1989年生,博士,主要从事固结理论和渗流理论等方面的研究。E-mail:geozhengchen@gmail.com E-mail:li1994813@126.com
  • 作者简介:李红坡,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事软土地基固结理论方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51578164,No. 41672296,No. 51878185);广西自然科学基金创新研究团队项目(No. 2016GXNSFGA380008)。

Study of soil consolidation by vertical drains with overlapping smear zones

LI Hong-po1, 2, 3, MEI Guo-xiong1, 2, 3, XIAO Tao1, 2, 3, CHEN Zheng4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 2. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning, Guangxi 530004, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics in Hydraulic Structural Engineering, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China
  • Received:2019-08-19 Revised:2019-09-12 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51578164, 41672296, 51878185) and the Innovative Research Team Program of Guangxi Natural Science Foundation ( 2016GXNSFGA380008).

摘要: 在软基处理工程中,经常出现竖井打设变密而地基固结效率降低的现象。鉴于此,建立了重叠涂抹区内土体水平向渗透系数的分布函数,给出了涂抹区重叠时竖井地基超静孔压和平均固结度的解析解。通过分析不同工况下竖井地基固结度随竖井间距的变化情况,探究了竖井间距减小而地基固结效率不增反减的成因。最后,探讨了涂抹作用和井阻作用对竖井最小临界间距的影响。结果表明:相邻竖井涂抹区重叠是竖井地基中出现竖井最小临界间距的根本原因。涂抹作用越大,则竖井最小临界间距越大;具体表现为当地基扰动程度增大时或涂抹区半径增大时,竖井最小临界间距随之增大。井阻作用越大,则竖井最小临界间距越小;具体表现为当竖井渗透系数减小时、竖井长度增大时或竖井半径减小时,竖井最小临界间距随之减小。

关键词: 竖井, 固结, 涂抹区重叠, 地基扰动程度, 竖井最小临界间距

Abstract: In the soft foundation treatment projects, the phenomenon that the spacing of vertical drains reduces when the consolidation efficiency of the foundation decreases often appears. Given this, the distribution function of horizontal permeability coefficient of soil in overlapping smear zones is established, and then the analytical solutions are obtained for the excess pore pressure and average degree of consolidation of vertical drains foundation with overlapping smear zones. Based on the analysis of the variation of the average degree of consolidation of the foundation with the spacing of the vertical drains for different cases, the reasons are explored when the spacing of the vertical drains reduces and the consolidation efficiency of the foundation decreases. Finally, we discussed the influence of the smear effect and well resistance effect on the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains. The results show that the overlapping of smear zones of adjacent vertical drains is the underlying reason for the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains in the foundation. The greater the smear effect is, the greater the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains is. The specific performance is that the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains increases with the increase of the disturbance degree of the foundation or the radius of the smear zones. The larger the well resistance is, the smaller the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains is. When the permeability coefficient of the vertical drain decreases, the length of the vertical drain increases or the radius of the vertical drain decreases, and the minimum critical spacing of vertical drains decreases accordingly.

Key words: vertical drains, consolidation, overlapping smear zones, disturbance degree of foundation, the minimum critical spacing

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 郑晨, 白强强, 黄克起, 刘晓敏, 张强, 何晓佩, 宋立伟, . 黏土中竖井开挖诱发地层三维变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 335-342.
[2] 鲍树峰, 董志良, 莫海鸿, 张劲文, 于立婷, 刘攀, 刘晓强, 侯明勋, . 浮泥−流泥静态间歇沉降与低压固结沉降计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2763-2772.
[3] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[4] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] 周波翰, 张文利, 王栋. 球形贯入仪预测超固结土强度的数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1303-1309.
[6] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[7] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[8] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[9] 张基伟, 张佳鑫, 马文著, 贾红学, 吴卫东, 王传宝. 考虑锚杆滞后支护的竖井围岩加固力学模型半解析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3395-3409.
[10] 张振光, 徐杰, 李海祥, . 考虑中间主应力的非饱和土竖井主动土压力滑移线解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3045-3053.
[11] 詹润涛, 尹晓萌, . 利用时空变化的孔隙水压力测量数据识别固结模型参数[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3315-3328.
[12] 孙宏磊, 徐振恺, 刘斯杰, 蔡袁强, . 考虑土柱发展过程的淤泥真空预压大应变固结计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 133-146.
[13] 许宝龙, 卢萌盟, 刘元杰, 张鑫岩. 多元排水体复合地基固结解析模型和解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 73-83.
[14] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[15] 郭晓刚, 马垒, 张超, 淦树成, 王华, 甘一雄, 周通, . 软弱基底排土场边坡逆排堆高速率及稳定性控制方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 596-606.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!