岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1605-1612.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1161

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验

任洋,李天斌,赖林   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-02 修回日期:2019-09-12 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 李天斌,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程和隧道工程方面的教学和科研工作。E-mail:ltb@cdut.edu.cn E-mail:renyang_0616@163.com
  • 作者简介:任洋,男,1984年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地质工程和岩土工程方面的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室团队重点课题(No. SKLGP2011Z002)

Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area

REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2019-07-02 Revised:2019-09-12 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported the Key Program of the State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP2011Z002)

摘要: 强震后隧道震害调查表明,隧道洞口段的震害破坏尤其严重,需进一步加强隧道洞口段边坡动力响应方面的研究。以汶川地震灾区典型隧道洞口边坡为例,通过大型离心振动台试验,研究隧道洞口段边坡在强震作用下的动力响应特征及规律。试验研究表明:(1)在边坡坡面和坡内的加速度放大均具有显著的高程效应;隧道拱顶的加速度放大系数大于隧道其他部位;越靠近隧道洞口的加速度放大效应越明显。(2)不同振幅下坡体的加速度放大效应均十分显著,并且低振幅下的加速度响应大于高振幅下的加速度响应。(3)在维持0.25g振动加速度下不同离心荷载等级下的坡体加速度放大系数均大于2.0;但随着离心荷载的增大,加速度放大系数增长很小。(4)随着边坡高程的增大,动土压力总体呈线性降低,在相对高程为0.48时(即隧道拱顶),其动土压力响应系数最大。研究成果能为强震区隧道洞口段的抗减震设计和相关研究提供借鉴。

关键词: 隧道洞口边坡, 强震区, 离心振动台试验, 动力响应

Abstract: The investigation of tunnel damage after strong earthquake shows that the seismic damage of tunnel entrance is quite serious, so it is necessary to further investigate the dynamic response of tunnel entrance slope. Taking the typical tunnel entrance slope in Wenchuan earthquake area as an example, the dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope under strong earthquake are studied using large centrifugal shaking table test. The experimental results show that: 1) The acceleration amplification on the slope and inside the slope has a significant elevation effect, the acceleration amplification coefficient of the tunnel arch roof is larger than that of the other parts of the tunnel, and the closer to the tunnel entrance the more obvious the acceleration amplification effect. 2) The acceleration amplification effect of the slope is very obvious for different amplitudes, and the acceleration response at low amplitude is larger than that at high amplitude. 3) Under the condition of maintaining 0.25g excitation, the acceleration amplification coefficient of slope under different centrifugal load grades is greater than 2.0, but the acceleration magnification factor is basically flat with the increase of centrifugal load. 4) With increasing slope elevation, the dynamic earth pressure decreases linearly, and the dynamic earth pressure response coefficient at the relative elevation of 0.48 (i.e., tunnel arch roof) is the largest. Research results can provide reference for the design and research of seismic mitigation for tunnel entrance in strong earthquake area.

Key words: tunnel entrance slope, strong earthquake area, centrifugal shaking table test, dynamic response

中图分类号: TU 459
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[3] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[4] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[5] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[6] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[7] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[8] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[9] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[10] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[11] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[12] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[13] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[14] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[15] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!