岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1971-1982.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1312

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律

杨凯旋，侯天顺   

  1. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院，陕西 杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-29 修回日期:2019-11-07 出版日期:2020-06-11 发布日期:2020-08-02
  • 作者简介:杨凯旋，男，1994年生，硕士研究生，主要从事轻量土研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金（No.51509211）；中国博士后基金（No.2016M602863）；陕西省留学人员科技活动择优资助项目（No.2018031）；陕西省博士后基金（No.2017BSHYDZZ50）；西北农林科技大学外国文教专家项目（No.A213021803）。

Influence of compaction test types on compaction characteristics of EPS particles light weight soil

YANG Kai-xuan, HOU Tian-shun   

  1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • Received:2019-07-29 Revised:2019-11-07 Online:2020-06-11 Published:2020-08-02
  • Contact: 侯天顺，男，1981年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩土力学、地基基础工程与地质灾害防治方面的教学与科研工作。 E-mail: houtianshunyx@sina.com E-mail:754662925@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509211), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M602863), the Excellent Science and Technology Activities Foundation for Returned Overseas Teachers of Shaanxi Province (2018031), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2017BSHYDZZ50) and the Foreign Cultural and Educational Experts Foundation of Northwest A&F University (A213021803).

PDF (Chinese)

199

摘要： 为研究击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的影响规律，阐明轻量土压缩密实的本质，对3种不同EPS颗粒掺量的轻量土开展标准轻型、标准重型、小型轻型、小型重型4类击实试验，并测量EPS颗粒体积压缩率。结果表明：3种配比轻量土在4类击实试验下，轻量土的干密度随含水率的增加均先增大后减小，曲线形态类似抛物线，所得最优含水率依次接近31%、35%、39%。同配比轻量土，以标准轻型击实试验的最大干密度为标准，其他3类击实试验最大干密度的绝对增长量为?0.014～0.072 g/cm3，相对增长量为?2.647%～13.611%，4类击实试验所获得的最大干密度基本相同。受击实筒尺寸效应的影响，相同击实功时，小型击实试验的最大干密度大于标准击实试验，但差值较小。相同击实类型时，增加击实功对轻量土最大干密度提高不明显。在击实作用下，EPS颗粒具有明显的塑性压缩，压缩率随含水率和EPS颗粒掺量的增大而减小，其变化范围为0.955%～31.174%。EPS颗粒的塑性压缩和试样孔隙比的减小是轻量土压缩密实的本质，利用小型击实试验代替标准击实试验确定轻量土最优含水率和最大干密度的方法是可行的，可为轻量土工程设计和施工提供参考。

关键词: 轻量土, 击实试验类型, 击实特性, 最优含水率, 最大干密度, EPS, 体积压缩率

Abstract: To study the influence of the compaction test types on the compaction characteristics of EPS particles light weight soil, and to reveal the compaction mechanism of light weight soil, three kinds of light weight soil with different EPS particle contents were prepared for four different types of compaction tests, i.e., standard light-type, standard heavy-type, small light-type and small heavy-type. The volume compression ratios of the EPS particles were measured, respectively. The results show that the dry density of the light weight soil first increases and then decreases with increasing the water content for the three mixed ratios light weight soil under all the compaction tests. The curve shapes are similar to parabola, and the optimum water contents of the three mixed ratios light weight soil are approximately 31%, 35% and 39%. For light weight soil having the same ratio, the maximum dry density of the standard light-type compaction test can be taken as the standard. The absolute growth range of the maximum dry density for the other three kinds of compaction tests is from ?0.014 g/cm3 to 0.072 g/cm3, and the relative growth range is from ?2.647% to 13.611%. The maximum dry densities obtained by the four kinds of compaction tests are basically the same. Due to the influence of size effect of the compaction cylinder, the maximum dry density of the small-type compaction test is larger than that of the standard compaction test when the compaction energy is same, but the difference of them is small. For the same compaction test type, it is found that the increase in the compaction energy has no obvious effect on improving the maximum dry density of the light weight soil. Under the compaction action, the EPS particles exhibit obvious plastic compression, and the compression ratio decreases with increasing the water content and the EPS particle content. The volume compression ratio varies in the range of 0.955% to 31.174%. It is feasible to determine the optimum water content and the maximum dry density of the light weight soil by using the small-type compaction test instead of the standard compaction test, which can provide reference for engineering design and construction of light weight soil.

Key words: light weight soil, compaction test types, compaction characteristics, optimum water content, maximum dry density, EPS, volume compression ratio

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 黄英豪, 毛帅东, 张娟, 王文翀, 王硕, . 轻质流态固化淤泥回填料基本性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1700-1708.
[2] 冯晨, 李江山, 刘金都, 薛强, . 砷、镉复合污染土击实特性及微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 171-182.
[3] 常洲, 张留俊, 黄平明, 晏长根, 贾卓龙, 徐合清, . 炭质页岩的颗粒破碎及其路用性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3117-3126.
[4] 庄心善, 周睦凯, 陶高梁, 周 荣, 彭承鸿, 林万锋. 循环荷载下发泡聚苯乙烯改良膨胀土动弹性 模量与阻尼比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2427-2436.
[5] 郑俊杰, 邵安迪, 谢明星, 景丹, . 不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 324-332.
[6] 侯天顺, 杨凯旋. 挡土墙后EPS颗粒混合轻量土填料静止土压力 特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3249-3259.
[7] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[8] 郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景 丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基 挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[9] 邓友生，吴 鹏，赵明华，段邦政，. 基于最优含水率的聚丙烯纤维增强膨胀土强度研究[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 349-353.
[10] 彭尔兴，孙文博，章定文，刘松玉，朱小丹，. 非饱和含砂细粒土的气体渗透特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1301-1306.
[11] 赵 娜，左永振，王占彬，余盛关. 基于分形理论的粗粒料级配缩尺方法研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3513-3519.
[12] 文 桃，米海珍，马连生，应 赛，. 硫酸钠盐渍土击实特性与压实度评价试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3455-3462.
[13] 左永振，张 伟，潘家军，赵 娜. 粗粒料级配缩尺方法对其最大干密度的影响研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 417-422.
[14] 刘金龙 ，陈陆望 ，王吉利 ，汪东林,. 海上风机分段斜壁桶形基础的水平承载力计算方法[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2750-2758.
[15] 王天亮 ，岳祖润 . 细粒含量对粗粒土冻胀特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 359-364.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发