岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2342-2348.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1629

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究

乔向进1, 2, 3,梁庆国1, 2, 3,曹小平1, 2, 3,王丽丽4   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程国家级实验教学示范中心,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 兰州交通大学 甘肃省道路桥梁与地下工程重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070;3. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;4. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所 黄土地震工程重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-19 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:乔向进,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土及隧道工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41562013);兰州交通大学“百名青年优秀人才培养计划”;甘肃省科技计划资助(No. 18YF1GA055)。

Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system

QIAO Xiang-jin1, 2, 3, LIANG Qing-guo1, 2, 3, CAO Xiao-ping1, 2, 3, WANG Li-li4   

  1. 1. National Demonstration Center for Experimental Civil Engineering Education, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Road & Bridge and Underground Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 4. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, CEA, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2019-09-19 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 梁庆国,男,1976年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: lqg_39@163.com E-mail: 1132198435@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41562013), Hundred Young Talents Training Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University and the Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province (18YF1GA055).

摘要: 为了对桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段的抗震设计提供参考,通过大型振动台试验研究了桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段的破坏过程,并使用小波包变换对加速度响应信号进行了定量分析。研究结果表明:在地震动作用下,洞口段的破坏以拱顶边坡裂缝的产生为标志;桥隧相连体系中隧道洞口段不安全程度往往是拱顶最大,桥台次之,再而边坡,仰拱最小,但是实际工程中桥梁和隧道材料的强度和刚度相对较高,所以破坏往往先从坡体开始,然后才是拱顶和桥台部位,仰拱的破坏程度一般较小;低频成分(0.1~12.51 Hz)的地震波在洞口段边坡破坏过程中起主导作用,而且地震波从土体传播进入混凝土结构之前,由于不同材料界面处复杂的折射反射问题,低频成分会出现剧烈的变化;从低频成分能量占比变化的角度分析,洞口段边坡的破坏可分为3个阶段:小震作用下的弹性变形阶段,中震作用下的弹塑性小变形阶段,以及强震作用下的大变形破坏阶段。

关键词: 桥隧相连体系, 大型振动台试验, 洞口段, 动力响应, 小波包变换

Abstract: In order to provide reference for the seismic design of the portal in the bridge-tunnel connected system, the failure process of the portal was studied through the large-scale shaking table tests, and obtained the acceleration signals which were quantitatively analyzed by wavelet packet transform. It is found that the failure of the portal is marked with the appearance of the crack in the vault slope. The unsafety degree of tunnel portal in the bridge-tunnel connected system ranks as the vault, the abutment, the slope and the invert in turns under the action of ground motion. The strength and stiffness of the bridge and tunnel are relatively high and therefore, the failure often starts from the slope, then the vault and abutment, while the damage of the invert is generally slight. The seismic wave with a low-frequency (0.1?12.51 Hz) plays a leading role in the failure process of the portal-slope system. Due to the complex refraction and reflection effect between the different material interfaces, the low-frequency waves will change drastically before propagating from soil into concrete structures. By analyzing the changes in the percentage of the energy of the low-frequency waves, the failure of portal-slope system can be divided into three stages, i.e., the elastic deformation stage under the small-shake, the small elastic-plastic deformation stage under the medium-shake, and the large failure deformation stage under strong-shake.

Key words: bridge-tunnel connected system, large-scale shaking table test, portal section, dynamic response, wavelet packet transform

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[3] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[4] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[5] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[6] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[7] 王滢, 赵彩清, 王海萍, . 隧道内爆炸荷载作用下衬砌及周围非饱和土的动力响应解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1026-1038.
[8] 黄超, 钱建固, . 水锤作用下饱和地基蓄排水隧道的动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(12): 3802-3814.
[9] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[10] 王瑞, 胡志平. 铁路路基动力响应的2.5D有限元方法研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 284-301.
[11] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
[12] 李小信, 何超, 周顺华, 李晖, . 具有不规则界面的层状地基三维动力响应的薄层法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 655-668.
[13] 王志颖, 郭明珠, 曾金艳, 王晨, 刘晃. 地震作用下含软弱夹层顺层岩质斜坡 动力响应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2566-2578.
[14] 张硕成, 陈文化. 考虑不均匀冻胀土体-衬砌隧道在寒区的振动响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1467-1476.
[15] 张聪, 冯忠居, 王富春, 孔元元, 王溪清, 马晓谦, . 强震区软弱土层差异厚度下单桩动力响应振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1100-1110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!